Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Passengers on Jet flight bleed after crew forgets to maintain cabin pressure

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Passengers on Jet flight bleed after crew forgets to maintain cabin pressure

Old 20th Sep 2018, 04:07
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Up Top
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passengers on Jet flight bleed after crew forgets to maintain cabin pressure

This from an Indian news site ... I'm unable to post links just yet.

A Jet Airways flight between Mumbai and Jaipur had to return to Mumbai this morning due to cabin pressure dropping that led to bleeding from nose and ear of passengers on the flight.

An official of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) said that the Jet Airways B737 aircraft operating flt 9W 697 of 20th Sep 2018 (Mumbai-Jaipur) had air turnback to Mumbai, as cabin pressure fell due to the fault of cockpit crew.

“During climb, crew forgot to select bleed switch due to which cabin pressurisation could not be maintained. As a result, oxygen masks got deployed,” said the official.

The official added that as per initial information, few pax have nose bleeding.

“Out of 166 passengers on board, 30 have reported nose bleeding, few have ear bleeding and some are complaining headache. All the affected passengers are being attended to by the doctors at the airport,” the official further said.

Jet Airways could not be immediately contacted for the story.
Buzzing is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 04:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: SF Bay area, CA USA
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Where is the video of all these bloody folk? Of 166 pax, someone must be a videographer.
.
jack11111 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 04:51
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Up Top
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jack11111
Where is the video of all these bloody folk? Of 166 pax, someone must be a videographer.
.
Do a google search with the thread title and look for the videos.

The video is in Hindi with in-cabin footage of pax with masks on.
Buzzing is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 04:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Up Top
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jack11111
Where is the video of all these bloody folk? Of 166 pax, someone must be a videographer.
.
Hopefully now I can post the link ...

Buzzing is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 05:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: US
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Buzzing
An official of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) said that the Jet Airways B737 aircraft operating flt 9W 697 of 20th Sep 2018 (Mumbai-Jaipur) had air turnback to Mumbai, as cabin pressure fell due to the fault of cockpit crew.

“During climb, crew forgot to select bleed switch due to which cabin pressurisation could not be maintained. As a result, oxygen masks got deployed,” said the official.

The official added that as per initial information, few pax have nose bleeding.

“Out of 166 passengers on board, 30 have reported nose bleeding, few have ear bleeding and some are complaining headache. All the affected passengers are being attended to by the doctors at the airport,” the official further said.

Always good to see that the authorities really uphold the 'just safety culture'... Investigation? Nahh... way overrated. Let's just throw the pilots under the bus.
KingAir1978 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 08:25
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Age: 73
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why is this system not fully automatic?

If the FADEC has full authority over the engine, why doesn't the environmental control system have full authority over the cabin pressure?

Surely Mr. Boeing has some kind of a warning: "Excuse me, you're climbing without cabin pressure, have you forgotten something?"

Surely there is a serious warning on the flight deck long before the rubber jungle?

Surely the cabin staff are alert to this? Can't they prod the guys up the pointy end?

We have had pressurisation failures for decades: why has this not been dealt with?

What am I missing here?
JohnMcGhie is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 09:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Inside their OODA loop
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnMcGhie
Why is this system not fully automatic?
...
What am I missing here?
History
A VW Kombi retrofitted with a V8 engine and an Atari as one trainer used to remark...

Everything you request could be installed tomorrow, it could have a nice overhead panel and EICAS. Problem is some large operators won't buy it as it would be a new type for their crews, hence training costs.

So we still are still stuck with the Kombi,..
FYSTI is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 09:54
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: home
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could have been far worse.........Helios accident comes to mind.

From memory the cabin pressurisation warning on the flight deck is the same as the takeoff config warning which can lead to misunderstanding.
Right Way Up is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 10:10
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: It used to be an island...
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The problem seems not so much to be that there was a pressurisation problem which does happen, especially on the 737 with its badly integrated mix of controls and indicators, but that the crew handled it badly.

Indeed, how close was this to Helios (Indian edition) ?
nicolai is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 10:45
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,576
Received 123 Likes on 60 Posts
Almost 20% of the pax suffered bleeding as a result of a slow depressurisation to a mere 12-14,000 feet or so? Really?

Sounds highly unlikely to me, bleeding is surely pretty unusual even in a fast depressurisation?

I wonder if the word "bleed" got carried over from the pneumatics to the respiratory system by an over-zealous journalist?

I can well imagine the flight-deck's ears will be bleeding after they've listened to what their Chief Pilot has to say!
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 11:10
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Central UK
Posts: 1,576
Received 123 Likes on 60 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnMcGhie
Why is this system not fully automatic?

If the FADEC has full authority over the engine, why doesn't the environmental control system have full authority over the cabin pressure?

Surely Mr. Boeing has some kind of a warning: "Excuse me, you're climbing without cabin pressure, have you forgotten something?"

Surely there is a serious warning on the flight deck long before the rubber jungle?
It certainly is automatic, but just as the FADEC can't control a non running engine if you haven't given it any fuel the pressurisation system has nothing to control if you leave the bleed switch off and give it no air.

Warning? You bet there's a warning! A loud and very insistent intermittent horn but as said above it's the same as the t/o config warning and can result in a usually fairly short conversation that begins with "Why is the config warning going off at this altitude?" and ends rather abruptly with a scatalogical exclamation shortly thereafter. It doesn't give you a lot of time though, iirc the horn goes off at 10,000ft and the rubber jungle deploys at 14,000. Plenty of time for most crew to remember the other meaning of the config horn, something that is drilled into every 737 pilot.

It isn't a system failure, the systems all worked just fine as they were supposed to. The only thing that needs fixing is a crew who make a critical mistake, fail to spot it and additionally forget critical technical knowledge at the critical moment when the machine is urgently trying to tell them something. The usual fix is rockets of variable size inserted in the fundament with variable degrees of empathy.

I agree you would think that both the cabin crew and the pilots would notice the unusual ear sensations but the cc may be reluctant to call the flight deck for various reasons (ie below 10,000ft if that's SOP, or simply a steep authority gradient in the company/culture in question).
meleagertoo is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 12:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,787
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
Originally Posted by meleagertoo
Almost 20% of the pax suffered bleeding as a result of a slow depressurisation to a mere 12-14,000 feet or so? Really?
Having spent many happy hours at FL150 in unpressurised aircraft (albeit ones that took rather longer to get that high than a 737 does), I'm surprised at those injuries, too.

Particularly as FR24 suggests the JAI didn't in fact get above FL110.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 15:45
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Asia
Posts: 1,529
Received 45 Likes on 27 Posts
Was the pressurisation turned back on ? A sudden and rapid increase in cabin pressure could cause these symptoms.
krismiler is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 17:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Washington
Age: 87
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bet: Krismiler's got it right!!
waflyer is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2018, 22:15
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing have addressed the issue of incorrect bleed selection on the MAX. BLEED lights will illuminate with associated Master Caution if the bleed switches are in an incorrect position 45 seconds after the flaps are up after take off.
Matey is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 02:04
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wingham NSW Australia
Age: 83
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
Having spent many happy hours at FL150 in unpressurised aircraft (albeit ones that took rather longer to get that high than a 737 does), I'm surprised at those injuries, too.

Particularly as FR24 suggests the JAI didn't in fact get above FL110.
The "Rubber Jungle" should not have deployed automatically until the Cabin altitude reached 14000'. As for the excuse that the Cabin Pressure Warning is similar to the Take-off configuration Warning,
surely the crew should be smart enough to check the Cabin Pressure before reaching 14000'. The warning would have sounded as the cabin passed 10000'.
Old Fella is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 07:00
  #17 (permalink)  
fdr
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: 3rd Rock, #29B
Posts: 2,944
Received 847 Likes on 251 Posts
Us humans suffer from expectations of outcomes and that lowers our defences from having done the same routine many times, and having had successful outcomes routinely. Success breeds complacency, but it still better than having too many unsuccessful outcomes. This isn't normalisation of deviation, it is the fact that we get comfortable with what we are doing.

Do we bother anymore with the simple flaps/trim/pressurisation/spoilers? And if we do, (and not because we are OCD..) do we always do it? How often do we forget completely a checklist, or forget to complete a checklist? ECL's assist in that regard, but even ECLs can be overlooked.

Passing 10K, there was a time that the pressurisation was always checked, seems like a fair time to do a final check, but then if we are distracted in the first place, we may well be distracted for the next set of defences.

Systems relying on multiple switch selections to achieve the outcome, and where those also get done during relatively high workload periods have the need for good independent alerting systems in order to have reliability. Without that, we will occasionally prove that the flight crew are indeed human.

The barotrauma may well have occurred from re-pressurisation, the rate of change would probably be higher, but the sinus hates decomp if blocked, ears blow wax out in that case, but re-press on the ears can mess up the inner ear mightily. All are options, but you may have a sound point. That is the reason we do low rate descents after completing the emergency descent... As an aside, one military jet I fly is unpressurised, and that goes up to 35K occasionally, mainly I top out at 25K. Doing vertical manoeuvres with no press is interesting the first time, but really doesn't cause much discomfort, and that is at ROC/ROD around 15KFPM at 350-450Kts vertical. It is less fun than a 2.5" diff but it doesn't seem to hurt IF you don't have a cold. A percentage of every cabin is going to have compromised sinuses etc, so injuries are going to happen in a decomp/unpressed event.

I wouldn't be shooting the crew for being human. They are probably the least likely crew to ever climb unpressed in the near future.
fdr is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 10:21
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: The South
Posts: 303
Received 54 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by nicolai
The problem seems not so much to be that there was a pressurisation problem which does happen, especially on the 737 with its badly integrated mix of controls and indicators, but that the crew handled it badly.

Indeed, how close was this to Helios (Indian edition) ?
Similarities for sure but Helios had additional issues (the whole airline was a mess) with two pilots of differing nationalities using a shared second language and a captain who got out of his seat to see if the pressurization warning was overheating avionics due to a cooling fan failure; before passing out. There were issues with both crew members then as well, who knows what the crew dynamics were here but a culture in which two pilots from the same operator came to blows recently, doesn't bode well.
Timmy Tomkins is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 11:55
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krismiler
Was the pressurisation turned back on ? A sudden and rapid increase in cabin pressure could cause these symptoms.
This is a good question.
Decades ago, I did the Physiological Training Seminar that was offered to pilots by the FAA. The one I attended was at Andrews AFB and there were 16 of us in the class.

One of the exercises was a rapid decompression from 8,000ft to something over 30,000ft. That rapid decompression occurred over 4 or 5 seconds. It was meant to simulate what might happen in an airliner that lost a window. We donned our masks and stayed at 30+K for a few of minutes before the recompression. The recompression took less than 5 minutes. All 16 of us did this (in two groups of 8). No one suffered any bleeding.

I can think of two things that were different: First, we may have been exposed to the high altitude longer than the Jet Airways passengers. Second, the air we were breathing may have been significantly colder.

BTW: I notice that they still offer this course - but in a toned down version and only in Oklahoma. FAA Physiological Training Seminar
.Scott is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2018, 23:30
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krismiler
Was the pressurisation turned back on ? A sudden and rapid increase in cabin pressure could cause these symptoms.
Similar event at our company. Rapid double bleeed engagement at altitude resulted in injuries. That’s why normal bleed establishment is done one at a time after a ‘bleeds off’ takeoff.
misd-agin is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.