Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

NASA - Pilotless plane flies through public airspace

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

NASA - Pilotless plane flies through public airspace

Old 19th Jun 2018, 10:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NASA - Pilotless plane flies through public airspace

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/n...lane-for-first

Last edited by 4EvahLearning; 19th Jun 2018 at 13:58. Reason: change to accurate title.
4EvahLearning is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 12:42
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Close to you
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Title should read
"Nasa - Remotely Controlled Pilotless plane flies through public airspace"
dcoded is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 13:24
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 67
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Four exorbitantly expensive graduates flew this missions from the ground. This is the culmination of years working on this project, a large bank of computer displays, uninterruptible and encoded satellite data channels. "We are very pleased with this outcome." said the spokeswoman from NASA. She went on: "Our next step is to try and save a fortune by having human beings fly these aircraft. We believe they will require less training, require less infrastructure, be more adaptive to the environment, give a smoother ride and be capable of dealing more quickly with any problems that may occur during flight. Unfortunately, we have so much money to spend on projects like this we are unable to envisage any time in the future when we can start planning for a manned flight."

PM
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 15:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Our next step is to try and save a fortune by having human beings fly these aircraft. We believe they will require less training, require less infrastructure, be more adaptive to the environment, give a smoother ride and be capable of dealing more quickly with any problems that may occur during flight.
Joking of course or badly phrased?
funfly is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 17:06
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugged Island
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This was done in the UK 3 years ago (I thought it was longer than that but open source material says 2015). The fact that the yanks have finally caught up really isn’t news.

Last edited by Father Dick Byrne; 19th Jun 2018 at 17:27.
Father Dick Byrne is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 20:18
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sixchannel
- - until one day, when in the cruise at altitude, comes the announcement -
"Good morning. This is your Virtual Captain speaking - ing - ing - ing - ing - ing"
Hopefully by then we'll all be telecommuting anyway, so there will be virtual passengers too.
llondel is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2018, 22:37
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hawarden (near EGNR)
Age: 74
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Father Dick Byrne
This was done in the UK 3 years ago (I thought it was longer than that but open source material says 2015). The fact that the yanks have finally caught up really isn’t news.
Maybe somewhat earlier. On 16th November 2010 I attended a symposium at BAE Systems Warton entitled, Uninhabited Air Systems (UAS) for Civil Applications. This included: The ASTRAEA Programme, Civil UAS Applications, Key UAS Technologies, including: Sense and Avoid, Weather Integration, Autonomy and Decision Making, Mission Management & Certification.

Clive.
Ancient-Mariner is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 06:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugged Island
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ancient-Mariner
Maybe somewhat earlier. On 16th November 2010 I attended a symposium at BAE Systems Warton entitled, Uninhabited Air Systems (UAS) for Civil Applications. This included: The ASTRAEA Programme, Civil UAS Applications, Key UAS Technologies, including: Sense and Avoid, Weather Integration, Autonomy and Decision Making, Mission Management & Certification.

Clive.
Yes, I also remember a briefing a lot earlier than 2015 but can’t find anything open source to say it was public knowledge...
Father Dick Byrne is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 07:30
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,060
Received 64 Likes on 39 Posts
The BAE flights had a monitoring test pilot on board didn't they? This time they open regular procedures for everyday drone traffic within public airspace.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 07:57
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Piltdown Man
Four exorbitantly expensive graduates flew this missions from the ground.
Grad students are dirt cheap. You could easily hire 4 of them for the price of 2 commercial pilots.
Nemrytter is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 08:04
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its another step along the long path to on board pilot extinction. Next logical step will be single pilot and a co=pilot on the ground monitoring multiple flights. Thankfully I'll be long retired by then.
macdo is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 08:10
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Rugged Island
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
The BAE flights had a monitoring test pilot on board didn't they? This time they open regular procedures for everyday drone traffic within public airspace.
BAE did work with remotely operated craft with pilots on board, but I’m talking about an uninhabited aircraft. Not sure which A-M is referring to, specifically,
Father Dick Byrne is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 11:01
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,786
Received 196 Likes on 90 Posts
Originally Posted by Less Hair
The BAE flights had a monitoring test pilot on board didn't they? This time they open regular procedures for everyday drone traffic within public airspace.
The flight being referred to wasn't one of those, but this one, which did indeed take place in 2015:

Watchkeeper Flown in UK Civil Airspace For The First Time

Good luck trying to get a monitoring pilot on board a Watchkeeper.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 15:11
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: California
Age: 64
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember a pilotless aircraft crossing the Pacific 17 years ago
On 24 April 2001, a Global Hawk flew non-stop from Edwards in the US to RAAF Base Edinburgh in Australia, making history by being the first pilotless aircraft to cross the Pacific Ocean. The flight took 22 hours, and set a world record for absolute distance flown by a UAV, 13,219.86 kilometers (8,214.44 mi).[93]
slatch is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 15:58
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I could imagine the rational for oceanic cargo flights from a remote dedicated departure airfield to a remote dedicated destination being pilotless and remotely controlled. They could have dedicated routes and levels and cause no conflict with civilian traffic.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 16:49
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Earth
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dcoded
Title should read
"Nasa - Remotely Controlled Pilotless plane flies through public airspace"
I couldn't say better.

Btw it's not a news that I liked to read. It's clearly the beginning of the end. I hope I will retire before my Virtual Chief Pilot ask me to monitor screen N° 9 while he is going for a break ;-)
Mlambin is offline  
Old 20th Jun 2018, 21:13
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As SLF, I can see where having a system whereby the ground (or the aircraft itself) can take over in an emergency could save lives. Hijacking? Smoke in the cockpit? Decompression? I don't think a full-time system would currently be feasible (any more than it has been with automobiles), but when the choice is the computer flying the plane or the plane being totally out of control, then I'd take my chances with the computer.
jugofpropwash is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 14:05
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Whereby ground take over...in event of hijacking". Does it occur that such a facility could be used to commit a hijack rather than defend against?

why would we face a choice between computers and "going out of control"? Remotely piloted types currently crash far more often even than high-performance military types.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2018, 15:01
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,532
Received 72 Likes on 41 Posts
My first view of this thread. Piltdown Man is da man!!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2018, 00:39
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Connecticut, USA
Age: 64
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
"Whereby ground take over...in event of hijacking". Does it occur that such a facility could be used to commit a hijack rather than defend against?
Because it would only be enabled when the pilots squawked an emergency code on the transponder?
jugofpropwash is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.