Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Crew humiliation Mexican style

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Crew humiliation Mexican style

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16th Jun 2018, 08:56
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crew humiliation Mexican style

on arrival Mexico (Cancun), all foreign flight crew (and only crew)diverted to a cordoned off 'pen" to await a customs search. The actual search seemed a perfunctory "going through the motions" took 10-15 minutes, conducted in full view of passengers passing by, duty free bottles clinking, none of whom were searched. Interesting that resources can be found for this while Mexico is in the grip of a full-blown drugs war although I haven't experienced quite such targeted unpleasantness anywhere else in the world. Anyone know what it's all about?
ShotOne is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 09:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You must be new to CUN as they have been doing this for years in one way or another. Allegedly a response to UK border force routinely turning over Mexican crew, although I can't imagine what they would be looking for.
macdo is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 12:14
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: EU
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mexico City not much different.
On arrival, while pax go through the usual random style customs check, crew has their own channel where both checked and carry-on bags get x-rayed first en then also hand searched, all bags, every time, no exceptions.
On departure after having gone throughI think 2 security checks there is another check in the gate where every bag is thoroughly hand searched while somebody is videotaping that with his camera almost in your face. Very annoying..
golfyankeesierra is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 12:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,549
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
As others have said both MEX and CUN customs have been tighter than a ducks ..with crew for years now.....basically we are advised to not carry in anything that could be construed by the officials as being up for resale whilst in the country - so only carry one laptop/iPad, be wary of taking valuable sporting equipment in, etc.....
wiggy is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 13:30
  #5 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If that's the case, wiggy, why focus on crew? And if macdo's post is correct, only UK crew. Is that really so? If it is it's even more outrageous.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 13:36
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: FL410
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
If that's the case, wiggy, why focus on crew? And if macdo's post is correct, only UK crew. Is that really so? If it is it's even more outrageous.
Macdo's post is not correct in one sense: it is NOT ONLY UK crews.
All international crew arrivals are subjected to this.
Skyjob is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 13:38
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,403
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
It's not just UK crew and it's their country, so their rules. It has been like this for years.
beardy is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 14:26
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Their rules.." That's hardly an explanation. Indeed it begs the question why a country suffering over 29,000 drug-related murders a year can find law-enforcement resources for a focused screw-around of one professional group.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 14:44
  #9 (permalink)  
Below the Glidepath - not correcting
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,874
Received 60 Likes on 18 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
"Their rules.." That's hardly an explanation. Indeed it begs the question why a country suffering over 29,000 drug-related murders a year can find law-enforcement resources for a focused screw-around of one professional group.
con·flate
kənˈflāt/
verbverb: conflate; 3rd person present: conflates; past tense: conflated; past participle: conflated; gerund or present participle: conflating
  1. combine two or more ideas, etc. into one.
Two's in is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 14:56
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
"Their rules.." That's hardly an explanation. Indeed it begs the question why a country suffering over 29,000 drug-related murders a year can find law-enforcement resources for a focused screw-around of one professional group.
As a US based crew member regularly going through the 'over the top' security screening, that crews are constantly subject to at Heathrow, I find it quite ironic hearing a UK crew member complaining about anybody else's procedures.
Glassos is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 14:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They were doing that when I started going there circa 1995. Only thing that has changed since then is the standard of HOTAC which seems to change regularly.

You can probably guess which way the standard has gone.
763 jock is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 14:58
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,403
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
"Their rules.." That's hardly an explanation. Indeed it begs the question why a country suffering over 29,000 drug-related murders a year can find law-enforcement resources for a focused screw-around of one professional group.
Perhaps if you were Mexican you would be privileged enough to question and influence the policy of the Mexican government. Since you are not you have no case to criticise their priorities.
I too have been through this procedure in Cancun. It is frustrating but neither I nor my crew found it humiliating, but then we didn't consider ourselves as anything special.
beardy is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 15:06
  #13 (permalink)  

Controversial, moi?
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
As a US based crew member regularly going through the 'over the top' security screening, that crews are constantly subject to at Heathrow, I find it quite ironic hearing a UK crew member complaining about anybody else's procedures.
Might that be in retaliation for the procedures and implementation thereof the USA adopted for incoming visitors and crew members following the tragedy of 9/11?
M.Mouse is online now  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 15:21
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nirvana..HAHA..just kidding but,if you can tell me where it is!
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last time through Cancun they advised me that I could not bring in my snorkel mask and fins.
The explanation given was that as I was entering as working aircrew,I could only bring in items pertinent to my reason for being there.
It occurred to me that a doctors note was called for,telling me that I should swim every day for my frozen shoulder!!!!
Further digging unveiled that I could indeed bring my fins and mask along however,a charge of 6% tax would be levied.
Therefore,any idea on the current value of a Decatlon children's mask and fins set?!!!!!!!
What a load of............
Also noted...they are only following orders,and a smile and cheerful attitude usually works wonders for a swift transit!
Yaw String is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 15:39
  #15 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ShotOne
"Their rules.." That's hardly an explanation. Indeed it begs the question why a country suffering over 29,000 drug-related murders a year can find law-enforcement resources for a focused screw-around of one professional group.
It is a very corrupt government at the federal level. Always has been, always will be.
aterpster is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 15:46
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by M.Mouse
Might that be in retaliation for the procedures and implementation thereof the USA adopted for incoming visitors and crew members following the tragedy of 9/11?
It would certainly be expected after such an event. As far as I know, outgoing crews go through normal screening on departure from the US. The crew screening for outbound crews is totally different at Heathrow. Many of my fellow crew members choose to go through passenger screening at Heathrow simply because it's less intrusive.
Glassos is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 16:13
  #17 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Since you're not Mexican.." if you're insisting issues affecting us can only be discussed by nationals of the country where it's happening, that's demonstrably NOT a pprune convention, witness about a zillion posts regarding various policies of President Trump. No, beardy I don't "consider myself special" but I'd still like to know the reason for a unique and time-consuming procedure being applied to crew but nobody else in a country where enforcement resources are stretched way past breaking-point.
ShotOne is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 18:04
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 1,403
Received 40 Likes on 22 Posts
The reason is that the customs officials are complying with the law of the country. You have no influence to change that law, one which complies with international conventions. You may not like it, I don't, but if you want to operate to and from there you will lower your blood pressure by just accepting that that's the way they do it .

IATA Mexico

Last edited by beardy; 16th Jun 2018 at 18:48.
beardy is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 18:50
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: 60 north
Age: 59
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Council Van

True.
But that does not give the UK the right to be anal about it! And hold the rest of the world hostage to the " Liquid Ban" everyone was ready to drop ca 5 years ago.
Does it?
.
Oh , and good luck with speaking the truth in this matter. It is not popular.
BluSdUp is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2018, 20:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BluSdUp
True.
But that does not give the UK the right to be anal about it! And hold the rest of the world hostage to the " Liquid Ban" everyone was ready to drop ca 5 years ago.
Does it?
.
Oh , and good luck with speaking the truth in this matter. It is not popular.
Ding ding ding! Very true.
oceancrosser is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.