End of the road for Iran aviation imports
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the biggest issue with the deal is that it is a one side deal, where one side does not care at all about the deal and continues to do what it promised it would stop doing. What is the point of that “deal”? Those types of deals work only with civilized countries and Iran is not one of those...
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hard to believe that America doesn’t want to send hundreds of millions to a country that chants, “death to America” as they pursue nuclear weapon capabilities.The Apologist isn’t in charge anymore.
https://youtu.be/E39bZl_mNAc
https://youtu.be/E39bZl_mNAc
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Montreal, Canada
Age: 50
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=LTNman;10142708]
they control the money....the zionists bankers created the central banks in the most influential countries in the west, and their master piece was the US federal reserve, after that , it was done. No body will ever become president of the US unless he or she bows to them. It’s rotten.....congress and all that. And even worse, any US administration also needs to accomodate the Saudi thugs..and we all know that Iran is public enemy no 1 to both Israel and Saudi Arabia.
Seems that American foreign policy is now set and controlled by Israel. For such a small country they seem to wield a great deal of power and influence over America.
[/QUOTEthey control the money....the zionists bankers created the central banks in the most influential countries in the west, and their master piece was the US federal reserve, after that , it was done. No body will ever become president of the US unless he or she bows to them. It’s rotten.....congress and all that. And even worse, any US administration also needs to accomodate the Saudi thugs..and we all know that Iran is public enemy no 1 to both Israel and Saudi Arabia.
The USA will just extend sanctions to countries that continue to do business with Iran. And then it becomes a poo-flinging contest. Who can less afford to do without the other's business. Ten years ago, US and world financial systems were so intertwined that such sanctions would have crippled both sides. But since then, the US has implemented FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) which has had the effect of other countries sending US banking and finance business back here (or risk some pretty invasive audits by US authorities). So now, disengagement is much more probable. It would hurt American companies dependent on EU products (US airlines who need Airbus spare parts). But with Trump, the phrase "cutting off one's nose to spite the face" comes to mind.
Last edited by EEngr; 10th May 2018 at 15:31. Reason: speling misteak
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I would add that America does not want to "send hundreds of millions to Iran", it is reparation of BILLIONS of Iranian funds illegally seized by America.
That hardware was never delivered thanks to the Iranian Revolution and the Hostage crisis.
And you cannot use the words "good faith" in the same sentence as "America".
Just ask Gaddafi, or Hussein or pretty much anyone else in the world.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has-...war-ii/5492051
Just ask Gaddafi, or Hussein or pretty much anyone else in the world.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/us-has-...war-ii/5492051
During your graveside meeting with Gaddafi, ask him what he thinks of Canada’s efforts that aided in ousting him.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some compliance!
Right...and alienate the US market, one far larger than the Iranian one. Don’t fool yourself into thinking that removing US content wouldn’t ripple through airline boardrooms in the US. Having an international composition pays dividends beyond the occasional setback.
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Lon UK
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ken
I am no -ones spokesman but reflecting the objective truth that a lot of people in the USA and just about every other world leader , opinion maker and sentient being thinks the President has made a major mistake
When yr only supporters are Netanyahu and the Saudis yr in a lonely place...............
I am no -ones spokesman but reflecting the objective truth that a lot of people in the USA and just about every other world leader , opinion maker and sentient being thinks the President has made a major mistake
When yr only supporters are Netanyahu and the Saudis yr in a lonely place...............
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: E.Wash State
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If using US sourced components in aircraft leaves foreign manufacturers vulnerable to restrictions on who they can sell to, they may consider looking elsewhere. The alternatives may be more expensive or not as good but at least a deal could go through.
Sanctions like this can often have the effect of making alternatives, which wouldn’t otherwise have been viable, a realistic proposition. South Africa developed a sophisticated domestic armaments industry and even went onto become an exporter because of trade restrictions.
If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
Sanctions like this can often have the effect of making alternatives, which wouldn’t otherwise have been viable, a realistic proposition. South Africa developed a sophisticated domestic armaments industry and even went onto become an exporter because of trade restrictions.
If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
If using US sourced components in aircraft leaves foreign manufacturers vulnerable to restrictions on who they can sell to, they may consider looking elsewhere. The alternatives may be more expensive or not as good but at least a deal could go through.
Sanctions like this can often have the effect of making alternatives, which wouldn’t otherwise have been viable, a realistic proposition. South Africa developed a sophisticated domestic armaments industry and even went onto become an exporter because of trade restrictions.
If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
Sanctions like this can often have the effect of making alternatives, which wouldn’t otherwise have been viable, a realistic proposition. South Africa developed a sophisticated domestic armaments industry and even went onto become an exporter because of trade restrictions.
If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sanctions like this can often have the effect of making alternatives, which wouldn’t otherwise have been viable, a realistic proposition
If using US sourced components in aircraft leaves foreign manufacturers vulnerable to restrictions on who they can sell to, they may consider looking elsewhere...
...If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
...If the French, Chinese and Russians got together, within a few years American parts might not be needed at all.
The Russians (and the Chinese) are building commercial transports and the world is free to buy them, but I don't hear much about who's standing on the queue at the moment.
I'm sure any collaboration would take this into account, the Chinese are quite happy to deal with anyone if it suits their interests especially in Africa. The Russians are quite similar.
Years ago sophisticated components could only be produced by a handful of countries, these days there are many more alternatives. The USA is less important than it was 40 years ago and can't expect to dictate to the rest of the world.
Britain was a world power in the 19th century but is considerably less important today.
Years ago sophisticated components could only be produced by a handful of countries, these days there are many more alternatives. The USA is less important than it was 40 years ago and can't expect to dictate to the rest of the world.
Britain was a world power in the 19th century but is considerably less important today.
I dont doubt that OEMs and vendors could be sourced from other than US sources. That’s been the situation for awhile. If there was an appetite to do so, it would have already happened. You can can continue to dream about this, but we both know it won’t happen.
Your naive to think that the Chinese, Russian, or whomever else who had the authority to stop a sale wouldn’t step in from time to time. Let me know how helpful the Chinese would be with an aerospace sale to Taiwan with technology that might have a dual military/civil application.
Your naive to think that the Chinese, Russian, or whomever else who had the authority to stop a sale wouldn’t step in from time to time. Let me know how helpful the Chinese would be with an aerospace sale to Taiwan with technology that might have a dual military/civil application.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Compare the Korean cars of the 1980s with those made today.
If countries start buying Russian and Chinese aircraft in significant numbers because they have no alternative, this could be the catalyst that kicks off their aerospace industries.
West Coast makes a good point regarding Russia and China. Witness their continued vetoes on the UN Security Council when matters far more grave than the sale of commercial transports were under consideration.
I agree, being worthy of trust in any bilateral or multilateral enterprise an issue, something the UK, EU and the US have in spades, although the current US president appears to be doing his best to erode some of that trust that has been steadily built up over decades.
Nemo Me Impune Lacessit
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Derbyshire, England.
Posts: 4,091
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Utter nonsense.
Iran's nuclear facilities have been inspected to death by the IAEA and other agencies. Iran has been judged to be in COMPLETE compliance since the signing. Even Mossad agrees FFS.
It is AMERICA who has not lived up to its side of the agreement!
Iran's nuclear facilities have been inspected to death by the IAEA and other agencies. Iran has been judged to be in COMPLETE compliance since the signing. Even Mossad agrees FFS.
It is AMERICA who has not lived up to its side of the agreement!
Pegase Driver
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
interesting theory I just heard on TV this morning ; all this recent activity against Iran , incl. the missile strikes on Iran troops in Syria is a coordinated plan to get rid of Iran influence in the Mid East region .,Trump's electoral promise, the "secret nuclear old plan" leaks, the visit on Netanyahu to Moscow a few days ago , the official support f the Arab States for Israel actions ( to defend the Golan, an occupy territory according to them !) ,The US sanctions are just part of the plan .It would appear the Europeans are openly against it because they fear for they business deals with Tehran, ( including aviation ) but they secretly support the plan. So basically a big order for Airbus from some Arab States to compensate for Iran airlines lost deals would solve the issue .. A theory remember..