Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Death knell for Great Lakes Airlines

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Death knell for Great Lakes Airlines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Mar 2018, 16:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lander, WY, USA
Posts: 286
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Death knell for Great Lakes Airlines

https://www.denverpost.com/2018/03/2...s-flights-dia/
340drvr is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2018, 19:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Very unfortunate, they've been going for quite a while.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2018, 19:49
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
Very unfortunate, they've been going for quite a while.
Unfortunate for the people employed there who will have to find new jobs, on that I can agree. Other than that, I'm not seeing the unfortunate part. Bear in mind that Great Lakes was the kind of operator who removed all but 9 seats from a 19 seat airplane, for no other reason than so they could operate scheduled service under part 135 instread of part 121, and thus hire 250 hour pilots at their (lowest in the industry) poverty wages instead of increasing their pay scale to attract 1500 hour pilots. Great Lakes was the lowest of the bottom feeders, and went to great lengths to maintain that position.

From a slightly different perspective, Great Lakes existed pretty much exclusively to feed on "Essential Air Services " contracts, in which they are paid to fly route's which don't have the demand to have air service. Just the fact that they were apparently able to serve the needs of the destinations with a 9 seat airplane should tell you about the real need for 7 day a week scheduled air service. We aren't talking about isolated, road-less communities where the is no other practical means means of transportation. The Great Lakes destination were generally connected to good roads which allowed driving to a larger city with scheduled air service. I have more than once been present at Glasgow MT when their EAS predecessor, Big Sky arrived, with an empty metroliner, the F/O went into the station with paperwork, returned, presumably with different paperwork, and they departed, for the next stop, again, empty. No doubt there will be someone to take their place, and the EAS subsidy will live on, but I see no reason to lament the demise of the operator with the industry wide worst terms of employment, which existed solely to collect an unnecessary government subsidy.
A Squared is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 00:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry I spoke!
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 00:07
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: CYUL
Posts: 880
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by A Squared
Bear in mind that Great Lakes was the kind of operator who removed all but 9 seats from a 19 seat airplane, for no other reason than so they could operate scheduled service under part 135 instread of part 121, and thus hire 250 hour pilots at their (lowest in the industry) poverty wages instead of increasing their pay scale to attract 1500 hour pilots. Great Lakes was the lowest of the bottom feeders, and went to great lengths to maintain that position.
Good riddance!
Jet Jockey A4 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 02:13
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They will be back with 9 seat CRJ200'S
bloom is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 06:16
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West side
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great Lakes used to be dubbed as "Great Mistakes" by many who flew there. They were beyond terrible. And in the late 90's when major airlines were hiring like gangbusters, they operated a scheme where every captain upgrade trainee would fail the first checkride before they are eventually passed. This was by design to taint the trainee's record and created a roadblock when it came time for them to apply to the major airlines. This was how they retained pilots.

Glad I never worked there.
yellowcontrails is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 12:47
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bottom feeder airlines.....19 seats is still 135..their karma has arrived
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 14:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is anyone able to prove my theory that they designed their logo in Microsoft Word?
TheWestCoast is online now  
Old 1st Apr 2018, 14:40
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West side
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheWestCoast
Is anyone able to prove my theory that they designed their logo in Microsoft Word?
The "Great Lakes" written in italics? Probably right.
yellowcontrails is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 04:14
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 307
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts

Great Lakes has previously said it was pulling out of several regional airports because of problems retaining pilots.
The company cited new federal rules that require co-pilots to log 1,500 flight hours before they can work for commercial airlines, up from 250 hours.
The new Federal Aviation Administration rules, which took effect in August, and airline industry staffing shortages caused by the retirements of longtime pilots have made staffing for regional airlines very difficult, especially over the past six months, said Jim Higgins, an associate professor of aviation at the University of North Dakota.
“Right now, there’s clearly not enough pilots who are willing to go and work at regional airlines,” he said.

Seems to confirm the scuttelbut here.


https://www.denverpost.com/2014/03/2...ilot-shortage/
RickNRoll is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 05:06
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ironbutt57
bottom feeder airlines.....19 seats is still 135..their karma has arrived
Not for scheduled passenger service. I think you are correct for charters.
A Squared is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 05:54
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: EDLB
Posts: 362
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
So how do you bridge the gap from 0 to 1500h today. CFI in a 172 for two years+ ?
EDLB is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 06:04
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: West side
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EDLB
So how do you bridge the gap from 0 to 1500h today. CFI in a 172 for two years+ ?
If you are lucky!!!!
yellowcontrails is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 12:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by EDLB
So how do you bridge the gap from 0 to 1500h today. CFI in a 172 for two years+ ?
It used to take 2000 to 3000 hours and 250 hours of multi time to get on with a regional. You build the time as people always have in the past. You instruct, fly part 91/135, cargo ect... I can suggest if you find instructing for two years to much of a hassle perhaps the career is not for you.
Nothing has changed other than the pay is much better once you reach a regional.
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 12:47
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: US
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by yellowcontrails
Great Lakes used to be dubbed as "Great Mistakes" by many who flew there. They were beyond terrible. And in the late 90's when major airlines were hiring like gangbusters, they operated a scheme where every captain upgrade trainee would fail the first checkride before they are eventually passed. This was by design to taint the trainee's record and created a roadblock when it came time for them to apply to the major airlines. This was how they retained pilots.

Glad I never worked there.
Great Lakes pilot recently talked about training being tough but they had no busts as did others. Late 1990’s. So there was a standard that allowed people to pass.
misd-agin is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2018, 20:03
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sailvi767
It used to take 2000 to 3000 hours and 250 hours of multi time to get on with a regional. You build the time as people always have in the past. You instruct, fly part 91/135, cargo ect...
Yep, wasn't that long ago that it took a lot more than 1500 hours to get that first 121 job. I guess that the recent years of folks getting hired at a regional with 600-700 hours has established a new "normal" in many minds, but from a longer term perspective, getting 1500 hours before a 121 job is nothing.
A Squared is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.