Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

US Dept of Commerce slaps 220% tax on Bombardier c series

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

US Dept of Commerce slaps 220% tax on Bombardier c series

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Sep 2017, 06:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
US Dept of Commerce slaps 220% tax on Bombardier c series

Bombardier hit by tariff in Boeing row - BBC News

Yes, 220% tax.
WHBM is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 06:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Stable
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Free market?
cowhorse is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 07:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 80
Received 17 Likes on 11 Posts
Careful Boeing, Canada may retaliate!
Chris2303 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 07:18
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't this the type of behaviour we have come to expect from Boeing and the Dept of Commerce?
Delta's potential $5Bn order has suddenly become a $16Bn order. Ouch!
KelvinD is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 07:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: n/a
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Were there any such complaints from Airbus when European airlines placed orders with Embraer
or Bombardier? Wait and see if United AL pay back the 70% discount they received from Boeing.

Last edited by sfm818; 27th Sep 2017 at 07:54.
sfm818 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 07:43
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Midlands
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
United States of America seems to be showing its true colours - and this is the country the UK wants to set up a new trade deal with... Riiiighhhht
EastMids is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 07:56
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: North Up
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Of course Boeing has never received a gumment subsidy. Oh no.
Cazalet33 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 08:01
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: France
Age: 76
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The C-series must be rather good to scare the hell out of Boeing like that.
DJ77 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 08:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a simple response...
Piltdown Man is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 08:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hampshire
Age: 76
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The irony here with regard to Boeing is that the C Series is not considered a competitor to Boeing's current offerings. If it is not a competitor, then one can't use anti-competitive legislation. So that leaves spite as the motive.
KelvinD is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 08:34
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Top Bunk
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone here remember the USAF air tanker tender competition a few years back?
Won on technical merit by the Airbus 330. Boeing whinged again, and the deal went to the ageing and technically inferior B767.
Level playing field??
I won't even bother about how Boeing is subsidized by the US government/military.
45989 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 08:38
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Confoederatio Helvetica
Age: 68
Posts: 2,847
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, because of a $1 billion bail out by Quebec and the UK the US imposes an $11 billion tariff.

The bail out is supposed to be paid back.

Make America grape again, make everyone else too expensive.
ExXB is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 09:18
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Clipperton island
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sqwak something, US will laugh a little bit less once Canada will have cancelled the EF-18 order (and maybe the F-35 order) There are other and better combat aircraft on the market .....

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...mbardier-fight
recceguy is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 09:30
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: England
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
A slap on the wrist for cancelling the F35; look for a sweetener on the F18 deal helping Donald to drive down military procurement costs.
Also a big stick wave for any other country considering cancelling the F35.
PEI_3721 is online now  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 10:32
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a simple solution for Delta - just set up a dummy canadian company and operate the C series on lease on the canadian register.
A matching duty on all boeing products entering canada would also concentrate minds.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 10:37
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, 220% tax.

And which finger in the wind type calcualtion came up with this number? Let's think of the chairman's birthday, double it, add Trump's mental age - the whole family - and then we'll dump it on the Canadians who aren't even making an a/c that competes with Boeing, the complainant. Spot on. "Proposed? Seconded, Paased." Next. Now, this Airbus thing.........before we get onto those South American latinos at Embraer.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 11:23
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This punitive action by the US Commerce Dept. underscores the depths to which the USA will go to punish a friend , neighbour and staunch ally , all in order to " level the playing field " , of which Boeing is not even on. Both Britain and Canada must retaliate , but it must be done intelligently and with great effectiveness. Pi**ing off two invaluable allies is not wise. The C-Series must be quite an aircraft.

Last edited by 6000PIC; 27th Sep 2017 at 11:34.
6000PIC is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 11:38
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Various at the moment
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 1 Post
The rest of the world will buy the C series. Why do we all jump at what the US say ?
dc9-32 is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 12:32
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My teenage daughter is irrational, hypocritical and always looking for someone to blame. She will happily lock herself away for days at a time but comes begging to me when she wants something.

Perhaps this particular teenager should be allowed to find it's own way through such growing pains? Personally, I'm getting a little weary of all things American and would prefer to share a bottle or two of Merlot with my more cultured friends.
Cows getting bigger is offline  
Old 27th Sep 2017, 12:35
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dc9-32
The rest of the world will buy the C series. Why do we all jump at what the US say ?
It would appear that the 'dumping' level prices were because the rest of the world were _not_ buying the C-series.
Ian W is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.