SQ-368 (engine & wing on fire) final report out
Would a windmilling engine at cruise (i.e. shut down) still produce some degree of hydraulic pressure and electrical generation? What sort of speed would the engine be rotating at compared to idle?
There is no meaningful electrical generation on most windmilling engines - once N2 (N3) drops below 50%, the IDG drive disconnects.
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lost, but often Indonesia
Posts: 653
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi td,
Thanks for the detailed response to my question. Curiosity satisfied, much appreciated.
Related to this thread, I sent this to my brother a while back. (He's the real pilot, I'm the armchair pilot as you may have gathered)
"If those guys were driving their car home from work and the instruments were giving odd indications, the engine started vibrating and producing fumes I'm sure they'd pull over and turn the thing off 100% of the time. Wouldn't they? I doubt they'd keep driving home hoping she'll be right mate...?!" Am I being a bit harsh?
Bro hasn't replied, he's a bit busy. In the middle of a B777 endorsement ironically! :-)
Loads of SIM work of course but he says the 777 is easier to fly than the 737. One thing I found a bit astonishing, he has yet to see/ touch/ feel/ kick the tyres of a real 777 aircraft. The 1st time he gets to, is when he flies one to LA!
That's why I thought I'd ask you gentleman/ ladies all those questions..
Thanks for the detailed response to my question. Curiosity satisfied, much appreciated.
Related to this thread, I sent this to my brother a while back. (He's the real pilot, I'm the armchair pilot as you may have gathered)
"If those guys were driving their car home from work and the instruments were giving odd indications, the engine started vibrating and producing fumes I'm sure they'd pull over and turn the thing off 100% of the time. Wouldn't they? I doubt they'd keep driving home hoping she'll be right mate...?!" Am I being a bit harsh?
Bro hasn't replied, he's a bit busy. In the middle of a B777 endorsement ironically! :-)
Loads of SIM work of course but he says the 777 is easier to fly than the 737. One thing I found a bit astonishing, he has yet to see/ touch/ feel/ kick the tyres of a real 777 aircraft. The 1st time he gets to, is when he flies one to LA!
That's why I thought I'd ask you gentleman/ ladies all those questions..
Thanks tdracer, interesting stuff.
Octane:
Fair point, but companies these days don't like folks going off piste (especially on a twin) and shutting engines down if it is not a QRH requirement or a catastrophic problem outside the scope of the QRH.
Just out of interest if your brother has time ( though I'm guessing he won"t) ask him to have a look at the report and the 777 QRH, look at the early symptoms of engine issues on the SQ flight and see which relevant checklist has a requirement to shut the miss behaving engine down. FWIW the crew hadn't had a low oil pressure or high oil temp EICAS warning, the vibrations don't add up to being severe and were the flight crew really aware how severe was the fumes smell was in the cabin?
Ultimately it seems the crew thought they in conjunction with the company engineers on satcom had solved or at least contained the problem and hadn't had to shut the engine down.....I suspect the real "**** me " moment might have occurred quite quickly thereafter if they had run the Fuel disagree/Leak checklists properly though the one engine at idle would have might have delayed diagnosis (sorry to bring that up again but TBF it is also mentioned in the report's safety recommendations) but they never got there, possibly because to some extent they got sidetracked talking to "company" and perhaps convinced by the ground that the engine was ok.
There's a danger to modern comms...
Octane:
"If those guys were driving their car home from work and the instruments were giving odd indications, the engine started vibrating and producing fumes I'm sure they'd pull over and turn the thing off 100% of the time. Wouldn't they? I doubt they'd keep driving home hoping she'll be right mate...?!" Am I being a bit harsh?
Just out of interest if your brother has time ( though I'm guessing he won"t) ask him to have a look at the report and the 777 QRH, look at the early symptoms of engine issues on the SQ flight and see which relevant checklist has a requirement to shut the miss behaving engine down. FWIW the crew hadn't had a low oil pressure or high oil temp EICAS warning, the vibrations don't add up to being severe and were the flight crew really aware how severe was the fumes smell was in the cabin?
Ultimately it seems the crew thought they in conjunction with the company engineers on satcom had solved or at least contained the problem and hadn't had to shut the engine down.....I suspect the real "**** me " moment might have occurred quite quickly thereafter if they had run the Fuel disagree/Leak checklists properly though the one engine at idle would have might have delayed diagnosis (sorry to bring that up again but TBF it is also mentioned in the report's safety recommendations) but they never got there, possibly because to some extent they got sidetracked talking to "company" and perhaps convinced by the ground that the engine was ok.
There's a danger to modern comms...
Last edited by wiggy; 22nd Mar 2017 at 08:51.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Standby, Resyncing other FMC...
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Once again. The problem here wasn't that they kept the engine running. I would have done the same (unless told different by the QRH). But I can't understand why they used it for reverse after landing. That is what triggered the fire, not the engine problem in itself.
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I used to be a fan of Singapore Airlines. Flying all over the world. However the past few years that airline has lost my respect. Price of tickets is the highest of any airlines in Asia, service is sometimes times rude and robotic with a hint of arrogance. Accidents such as this one confirm that I made the right choice not to fly with them. And I am not alone thinking like this.
The problem here wasn't that they kept the engine running. I would have done the same (unless told different by the QRH)
In short on the triple an Engine fuel leak = appropriate engine shutdown on the 777, there's no QRH option/ECL option to keep running at idle and land but not use reverse.
Sorry, expat we might have crossed in editing.
TBH I do have some sympathy with the SQ crew, it has been shown in the sim that it is entirely possible for anybody to make a complete dogs dinner of the 777 Fuel Disagree/Fuel leak checklist, some of it is down to language used, some of it is being suckered in by logic branches produced by the ECL( Electronic CheckList). You really have to have a hard think about the exact question asked, the fuel system itself and what the checklist is trying to achieve before clicking the "yes" or "no" boxes.
TBH I do have some sympathy with the SQ crew, it has been shown in the sim that it is entirely possible for anybody to make a complete dogs dinner of the 777 Fuel Disagree/Fuel leak checklist, some of it is down to language used, some of it is being suckered in by logic branches produced by the ECL( Electronic CheckList). You really have to have a hard think about the exact question asked, the fuel system itself and what the checklist is trying to achieve before clicking the "yes" or "no" boxes.
Last edited by wiggy; 23rd Mar 2017 at 08:16.