Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Viable pipe bomb found by UK security

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Viable pipe bomb found by UK security

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Aug 2017, 20:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: U.K
Posts: 89
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's slightly different forgetting to leave your corkscrew, leatherman or yoghurt at home than a pipe bomb... they should have shot him on the spot.
simmple is offline  
Old 1st Aug 2017, 21:26
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is interesting what gets missed on occasion. Some years ago a friend brought a ceremonial dagger into the UK from Africa in the bottom of her backpack. She'd forgotten it was there and it was only when outbound from Heathrow that security pointed out its presence. They let her put it in a parcel and put it in the post.

Flying out of SFO when my son was small, I'd gone for a walk around the duty-free and when I got back to where he and my wife were sitting, he was drinking from one of his favourite soy milk cartons. Which was greater than 100ml by volume and it was part of a six pack. Security didn't spot it that day.

I had a hard disk in my backpack once, security were most interested in it (opaque to x-rays) and it got carefully checked for explosives. Second time, I put it in the tray with the laptop and it went through with no comment.
llondel is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 13:08
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ITALY
Age: 59
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to todays ‘Corriere della Sera’ the offender was initially suspected when security found a strange items in his possession at the security check for a flight between Manchester (UK) and Orio al Serio (Milano-Bergamo, Italy) , but they could not do anything as the item was found not to be a bomb/explosive.
However, UK security iformed Italian police. Apparently, the offender lived in Italy (or has lived in Italy for some years) and was working in UK.
Upon arrival in Italy, Italian police followed him discretely in all his movement, and they found that he had contacts with activists.
Upon his return in UK, before boarding the a/c in Italy, he was thoroughly inspected without finding any dangerous item. During his Italian trip, however, UK police determined that the item that they previously impounded from him in Manchester were in fact part of a homemade bomb, and therefore upon aiirval in Manchester- and in cooperation with the Italian police they arrested him
Daniel_11000 is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 13:50
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
" part of a homemade bomb" - if it took that time to establish it obviously was a longggg way from an active device
Heathrow Harry is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 16:43
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You've missed part of the press report: The security supervisor kept the "device" in her pocket. When the people who know about these things eventually saw it, nine days later, it was described as "potentially viable".
Pozidrive is offline  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 16:54
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Grauniad had it thus:
She said she was told the item had been swabbed and no trace of explosives found, so she “popped it into” her jacket pocket so “it wouldn’t go missing”.
Jeffery, who has worked at the airport for 19 years, said she later put it through an X-ray machine but could not see a detonator and did not believe it was viable.
The device was later passed to counter-terrorism police and, when examined by experts, found to be a “potentially viable” bomb containing nitroglycerin and nitrocellulose.
The question here is what "potentially viable" means in this context. Usually devices are viable or not, why qualify this with a "potentially"?
Joe_K is online now  
Old 2nd Aug 2017, 20:14
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Jose
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I would guess they mean that it would be capable of exploding but needed some extra parts first.
llondel is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2017, 08:56
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: sussex
Age: 75
Posts: 192
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Lots of travellers carry some nitroglycerine with them. It's only a problem if it's in a metal container with a primer attached. It's essential to avoid unwarranted persecution of "minorities" on the basis of minor infractions.
skridlov is offline  
Old 3rd Aug 2017, 15:38
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Correct, medication for certain heart problems.
Pozidrive is offline  
Old 8th Aug 2017, 14:36
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Convicted
Manchester Airport pipe bomb plot: Nadeem Muhammad guilty - BBC News
hoss183 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.