Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Turkish Airlines cargo 747 crashes in Kyrgyzstan

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Turkish Airlines cargo 747 crashes in Kyrgyzstan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17th Jan 2017, 21:39
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Herod,

Correct, it is possible to intercept a false lobe.
However, correct and false lobe will still have the same touchdown point.
You can intercept an ILS from above on B744 in a safe way. Let's face it, we all have have to do this from time to time. Doing it correctly though must be trained and demonstrated, and it potential dangers explained and shown. And remember: approach not safe and sound? GO AROUND.
Icelanta is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2017, 21:54
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: 43N
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Hotel Tango
act700, I understand and agree with you up to a point. However, GA's are not all that frequent. So one may ponder whether said Captain had, in those 800 hours on the B744, ever experienced a GA and (again specifically on the B744) what sort of training for such an event had the airline given him?
"General statistics

Before detailing the results of the survey, the BEA estimated the number of go-arounds performed by a pilot during his/her career, based on the figures communicated by Air France and those supplied by the main European airports. In general, these showed:

� Between 2 and 4 go-arounds per one thousand flights are recorded each year
� A medium-haul flight crew performs on average one go-around a year
A long-haul flight crew performs on average one go-around every 5 to 10 years
."

https://www.bea.aero/etudes/asaga/asaga.study.pdf

Last edited by CaptainMongo; 17th Jan 2017 at 22:08.
CaptainMongo is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2017, 22:05
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The Smaller Antipode
Age: 89
Posts: 31
Received 17 Likes on 10 Posts
And remember: approach not safe and sound? GO AROUND.
Exactly, as a young, soon to be RAF trainee pilot my then girl friends father, an ex-WWII Wellington pilot said - if you remember nothing else, remember this ....."When in doubt lash out" Power, pitch, mixture, carb heat, flaps, everything forward for speed. Concept still relevant despite being a 747
ExSp33db1rd is offline  
Old 17th Jan 2017, 22:19
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Harbour Master Place
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
False Glideslope

Not suggesting this was the cause of this accident, however mention of glideslope capture from above rattled around in my brain recalling a safety warning published a couple of years ago which I have managed to find: Unexpected autopilot behaviour on ILS approach when intercepting the glide path from above based on a 2013 event at Eindhoven ( Pitch Up Upsets due to ILS false Glide Slopes ).

Both worth a read.
CurtainTwitcher is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 01:14
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Not over the Rockies anymore.
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hotel Tango, again, I do not buy or accept that line of reasoning! If you are qualified on type, irregardless of hours, you should be able to perform any normal maneuver on that type.

"act700, I understand and agree with you up to a point. However, GA's are not all that frequent. So one may ponder whether said Captain had, in those 800 hours on the B744, ever experienced a GA and (again specifically on the B744) what sort of training for such an event had the airline given him"
act700 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 01:23
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Oztrailia
Posts: 2,991
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Captainmongo:----

Ok but we do maybe 6 or more missed approaches/go arounds from various situations each year in the Simulator under varying conditions. We have done for 20 years now so I'd suggest that over that time I've done 120 in the Sim and maybe another 15 in the actual Aircraft.
ACMS is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 06:15
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is it possible they decided to throw away the approach at a height of around 2000ft, by arresting the descent, but somehow the auto throttle didn't wake up? Would that explain the 'long drift' down the runway and, having run out of airspeed, result in a stall and crash?
SMT Member is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 06:28
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: I wish I knew
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If they were attempting an auto land, according to the post contributions their speed should have been circa 150/160 kts but one post commented according to "data" their speed was 185kts? What would be their GA performance at known weight with anti ice ON?
Avenger is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 07:26
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by Avenger
If they were attempting an auto land, according to the post contributions their speed should have been circa 150/160 kts but one post commented according to "data" their speed was 185kts?
The aforementioned data doesn't include either TAS or IAS. Groundspeed over the threshold was around 176 kts, surface wind negligible.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 14:24
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by act700
Don't forget your roots, all you xx-thousand hour gods...you too were 'low time on type' at some point...and somehow it all worked out, right?
I just don't buy this argument-besides, 800+ on type is more than enough to know one's way around.

But none of that really matters until some competent authority hints at what went wrong here.



Holy crap, I haven't been on here in forever!! Do I not have a life anymore??

Could not agree more.
Nieuport28 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 15:14
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by SMT Member
Is it possible they decided to throw away the approach at a height of around 2000ft, by arresting the descent, but somehow the auto throttle didn't wake up? Would that explain the 'long drift' down the runway and, having run out of airspeed, result in a stall and crash?
If the autotrottle did not wake up then the pilots were asleep also. Every aircraft I have ever flown be it Airbus, Douglas, Boeing, Lockheed you straighten out your throttle arm as the first thing on a GA. Not a terribly difficult thing to do.
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 15:45
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you are qualified on type, irregardless of hours, you should be able to perform any normal maneuver on that type.
Sorry, I disagree! The key word is "qualified". How "qualified" one is can arguably depend a great deal on training received on the type and how proficient the country's regulatory authority is.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 16:38
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 16:40
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Second recorder was found today.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 16:43
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Sweden
Age: 47
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kulverstukas

Your contributions are always excellent. However, in this case my Russian skills fail me.

Could you please specify exactly what the above chart is supposed to be? I have my suspicions but dare not show my ignorance about these things....
MrSnuggles is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 16:55
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's the damage zone on the blueprint of this tiny house village. Violet means buildings on this patch are damaged (and with cut-off roofs), red - totally destroyed.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 16:58
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PS: Grim pun is that this village name is "Aeroflot garden-house community"
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 17:00
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks as always Kulverstukas.

Looks like the approach pictured above is to runway 8. You can see the striped building with the marker beacon antenna in the foreground, it was in one of your earlier photos of the wreckage.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 17:19
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: East Angular - apparently!
Posts: 746
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
PS: Grim pun is that this village name is "Aeroflot garden-house community"
Kulverstukas:

I don't want to derail this important thread, but I've travelled widely in the FSU, though not to Bishkek. I've never heard of such a community before. Does this suggest that the people in this community worked at the airport?
barry lloyd is online now  
Old 18th Jan 2017, 17:45
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by barry lloyd
Kulverstukas:

I don't want to derail this important thread, but I've travelled widely in the FSU, though not to Bishkek. I've never heard of such a community before. Does this suggest that the people in this community worked at the airport?
It's not country-wide, it's usually local community. Possibly, in USSR time this patches was provided for airport workers (see, it's just 400 sq.m each) for growing fruits and vegetables. Usually it was in form of non-pofit cooperative. I think that if you put "aeroflot village" in google map you will find a thousands of them.
Kulverstukas is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.