Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

EasyJet A319

Old 13th Jan 2017, 16:33
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 322
EasyJet A319

Could not find any original post re this but if there is one perhaps the moderators could link it up.


EasyJet take-off data incident uncovers software anomaly



13 January, 2017
| SOURCE: Flightglobal Pro
| BY: David Kaminski-Morrow
| London


Investigations have traced an EasyJet A319 take-off performance incident at Malaga to a software anomaly in a particular electronic flightbag function.

The flaw enabled the flightbag to display information for two different runways simultaneously, which led the crew to use take-off calculations for runway 13 during a departure from runway 31.

EasyJet subsequently disabled the function – known as ‘multiple runway computation’ – from the flightbags on its fleet a couple of weeks after the 14 April 2016 incident.

This function of the Airbus FlySmart software is designed to calculate take-off performance for several selected runways to provide a comparison to the crew.

But UK Air Accident Investigation Branch analysis found that the software could display detailed information for one runway while simultaneously showing take-off performance data for another.

“The flight crew did not notice this during cross-checking,” says the inquiry, adding that neither Airbus nor the carrier was aware of the software anomaly at the time.

Investigators state that the flightbag had used an earlier version of FlySmart, and that the later versions are unaffected.

When the pilots undertook critical data entry checks, they did not notice that, while the intended runway 31 had been selected from a menu box at the top-right of the flightbag display, a results section on the same page was still showing data from runway 13.

“As most of the take-off performance calculations were usually performed using the ‘single runway’ option, the crew were familiar with verifying the selected runway in only one place – at the top-right of the screen,” says the inquiry.

“With a particular runway selected at this upper position on the screen, it is possible to make the assumption that the corresponding take-off performance figures on the ‘results’ page are related to that runway.”

The two runways are physically the same length, but runway 31 departures head inland towards rising terrain, while departures from runway 13 head out to sea.

Although the take-off was normal, the captain had noted that calculated speeds and the thrust-reduction altitude were lower. He assumed the carrier had changed some of the aircraft’s performance algorithms but, nevertheless, checked the calculations during the cruise, at which point he noticed the discrepancy in the displayed runway data.
Longtimer is offline  
Old 13th Jan 2017, 19:48
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 3,939
What kind of EFB does easy use? I seem to remember that we had the multiple rumway option on our windows based EFB, but we never had it on the iPad one.
Denti is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 03:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: somehere sandy!
Posts: 263
No I haven't ever seen that option on flysmart. Sounds useful with proper protections.

Can the OP amend his first post topic, as this doesn't relate directly to either easyJet or A319!
goeasy is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 06:08
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Botswana
Posts: 706
Easy don't use iPads.
RexBanner is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:19
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 77
On your opinion, do you think that individual computation would be better?
I-WEBA is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 52
Posts: 2,767
My opinion is that no operator should be doing a single calculation after the EK near miss in YMML a few years back and the report that followed.
Each flight crew member should independently calculate and then the results should be cross checked.
framer is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:49
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 3,939
Isn't that industry standard? I thought my airline was kinda slow for switching to that policy only 3 years or so ago.
Denti is online now  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 09:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 48
Posts: 556
My opinion is that no operator should be doing a single calculation after the EK near miss in YMML a few years back and the report that followed.
Each flight crew member should independently calculate and then the results should be cross checked.
14th Jan 2017 10:19
“The flight crew did not notice this during cross-checking,”
MATELO is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 10:02
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,466
The point is that one person did the calculation and the person cross checking didn't notice the error. Independent calculations would hopefully have ended up with two vastly different results and the glitch would have been spotted.
EGPFlyer is offline  
Old 14th Jan 2017, 15:08
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London
Age: 31
Posts: 571
Independent performance calculations are very much on the horizon at easy. I for one welcome it.
R T Jones is offline  
Old 15th Jan 2017, 05:29
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 41S174E
Age: 52
Posts: 2,767
The flight crew did not notice this during cross-checking,”
Matelo, I'm not sure what point you are making with the above post. Can you clarify?
framer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright © 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.