Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Husband and wife prohibited to share cockpit

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Husband and wife prohibited to share cockpit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28th Oct 2016, 13:17
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Old europe
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is an important issue that must be taken into account on this topic, (and I assume it has played a paramount role on the court ruling decision): this particular crew was involved on an aircraft accident in which CRM was a factor – “CRM principles were not evident during this event”, it is stated in the accident report under Conclusions Evidence.

Although this evidence finding was not developed nor any recommendation elaborated on it (a clear “gap” on the report, on my own opinion) what would anyone with management responsibilities on the company would do?

The answer looks clear to me…
CHAPARRAL is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 20:19
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Hyeres, France
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I spent all my career working in 'small' companies where we flew with the same Skipper / FO combinations very, very regularly.

During those years, my own experience was that there were good pairings and bad pairings, for a whole variety of reasons ( personality, history, culture and others ) and that a night working in a 'bad' pairing was a horrible night's work.

Same for a husband / wife pairing I suppose - some days or nights would be better than normal, some worse than normal, all depending on what's been going on during the two or three hours together before Report Time.

But I'll have to say - I'd find it difficult working with wife / son / daughter in a cockpit environment if my family are anything to go by and we class ourselves as normal....
Hussar 54 is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 20:20
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: aboard
Age: 64
Posts: 81
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have flown together with both my brother and my wife many times, and find this a absolute non-issue.
Like Luke says; if anything, we tried harder to be professional when we flew together.
Mariner is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 21:40
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My outfit has several husband+wife pilots. Some choose to fly together, others avoid it. There have been issues on a few occations, with one h+w disallowed to fly together for the last couple of years.

In some cases the wife is senior i.e. the Captain. Now how about that...
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 22:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by oceancrosser
In some cases the wife is senior i.e. the Captain. Now how about that...
Actually, of the few married pilot couples I know, a common scenario is that the wife was a flying student of the husband at one time. Years later the wife gets hired by the airline but the husband can't even get an interview. 'The curse of the white male' as one of my female colleagues puts it. Women and other underrepresented demographics are actively recruited and often hired with much lower experience levels than 'majority' applicants.

In more than one case I can cite, the wife goes to work in the training department and eventually is able to help get the husband an interview and a job.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 28th Oct 2016, 22:37
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Great Southern Land
Age: 72
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know of a couple who were divorced and flew together once or twice. I would have thought that would have made for an interesting crew, but he said there were no problems.
I flew with my son a couple of times, we had a great trip with no problems and I was a very proud dad!
Offchocks is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 00:03
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Eagles Nest
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unless the girlfriend was working in the cabin it should not be a problem flying with the wife ?
Toruk Macto is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 00:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fairly close to the colonial capitol
Age: 55
Posts: 1,693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the unspoken issue at hand professionalism?
vapilot2004 is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 03:42
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NZ
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
I'm wondering if the relevant issue may be the airline's exposure to litigation in the event of an accident, given lawyers ability to make mountains out of molehills.
Needle Knocker is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 07:28
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: down under
Posts: 463
Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by recceguy
I don't enjoy flying with pilots of pure civilian extraction.

I also don't like native English speakers - because our operation being in the English language, they al ways think they are right because of that fake superiority.

I also prefer the F/O to be of the same faith than me - because it's the true one.

Therefore the three previous combinations are a safety risk.
are you serious? or are you trying to be flippant?
cooperplace is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 07:52
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I do believe recceguy was indulging in a spot of irony
Basil is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 07:52
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: the pub
Age: 57
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks, I was trying to work that out too!
one dot right is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 13:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 514
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember that Air UK employed and rostered together an Iranian captain and an Iraqi first officer around the time of or not long after the Iran/Iraq war. Don't think there were any problems.
olympus is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 15:26
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is the acc. report.

http://www.gpiaa.gov.pt/upload/membr...os/i006503.pdf

One thing I find interesting in context to the courts ruling:

Crew resource management:
Due to the inability to collect voice data from the CVR, there is no recorded information to determine if crew resource management was in adherence to the company’s SOP.
His dudeness is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 21:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by olympus
I seem to remember that Air UK employed and rostered together an Iranian captain and an Iraqi first officer around the time of or not long after the Iran/Iraq war. Don't think there were any problems.
Interesting you should mention that.
Recollect having a beer or three in HK with that combination, but both captains, as they indulged in some mil humour about what would have happened had they met.
Actually would have been little doubt; one was Hercs and the other fighters.
Basil is offline  
Old 29th Oct 2016, 22:39
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Forest
Posts: 138
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Think I read somewhere a few weeks ago that Thomson jigged their rosters around a bit so a father and son could crew a 787 before the father retired, may even have been for his last flight. Lovely story I thought.
AeroSpark is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 00:22
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a passenger (self loading cargo)

If I knew, I would like to have a Man and Wife in the cockpit that would do everything to prevent either one being hurt as this would of course extend to all others on the aircraft. What the hell is the problem?????
Longtimer is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 00:37
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure sometime, somewhere, there has been a tanker captain who was the wife of a receiving thirsty fighter pilot. That scenario could lead to interesting anecdotes.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 00:50
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The original incident:

Accident: Sata A313 at Ponta Delgada on Mar 2nd 2013, tail strike on landing
aerotransport.org is offline  
Old 30th Oct 2016, 19:45
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Where it is comfortable...
Age: 60
Posts: 911
Received 13 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Longtimer
What the hell is the problem?????

The problem is/was not their relationship, but the fact that they paired for 85% of their flights. Trust & familiarity inevitably leads to complacency and relaxed monitoring, regardless of relationship. Being paired with a competent stranger is the safest combination, as both sides will be alert to what the other is doing.
andrasz is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.