Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

The strange reasons why United pilots declare emergencies

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

The strange reasons why United pilots declare emergencies

Old 25th Sep 2016, 07:03
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: USA
Age: 37
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Fortissimo
Not sure what relevance the right HF Transceiver has for an FMC problem - can someone enlighten me?

I am aware that some other B767 operators have problems with their FMC dumping data when the crew try to enter the SLOP at the start of the Oceanic leg, including the alternate FPLN. The manufacturer's advice was to leave 5 minutes between starting the leg and entering the offset, but that doesn't work either. The pilot I spoke to said crews were using heading hold while they manually entered the remainder of their route into the system. Painful, but less so than a MAYDAY and diversion?
There was a lot more going on with that airplane than stated here.
g-code is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 07:14
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Haifa
Age: 69
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Declaring an emergency seems to be influenced a lot by corp culture (and other cultural influences). From an unscientific sample using flightradar24, AF declares a lot, American airlines a moderate amount (considering their high traffic) AA the most, followed by UA and DL. The sample is also skewed by flightradar24 coverage areas...

Some airlines will declare an emergency, with trucks rolled etc, but never squawk 7700 - LY for example on several recent occasions at BGN.

It would be interesting for someone with more statistical knowledge than I to analyze the data from flightradar24 or another source. To be fair, the one time I declared I was already in the Class C, and I didn't change my squawk either.
sabbasolo is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 09:33
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
AA complains about turbulence more than any other airline.


Just as an aside..
stilton is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 13:23
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by stilton
AA complains about turbulence more than any other airline.


Just as an aside..
One thing that always amuses me is the number of times I hear a airline report severe turbulance over the Atlantic. I think a lot of pilots need to review the definition of severe turbulance. In addition anytime you state you have encountered severe turbulance a logbook entry is required and a aircraft inspection which can be quite lengthy is required. This step seems to be skipped quite often.
Sailvi767 is online now  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 15:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Sailvi767
In addition anytime you state you have encountered severe turbulance a logbook entry is required and a aircraft inspection which can be quite lengthy is required. This step seems to be skipped quite often.
Maybe they skip reporting turbulance because they haven't been to collage and don't know how to spell it.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 16:31
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hadlow
Age: 60
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe they skip reporting turbulance because they haven't been to collage and don't know how to spell it
Would probably do better going to college.
Super VC-10 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 17:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Super VC-10
Would probably do better going to college.
As we say here on PPRuNe, your right.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 20:57
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I overheard a United pilot at YYZ demand a new squawk code because the one the computer gave him was 6066, you know, three 6's means the Devil! That was strange!
413X3 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 21:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 864
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Airbubba
As we say here on PPRuNe, your right.
Only posted in a sense of mischief and due to the run of the thread, but.......



As we say here on PPRuNe, you're (as in you are) right. :ok

😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀
Juan Tugoh is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2016, 23:36
  #30 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 413X3
I overheard a United pilot at YYZ demand a new squawk code because the one the computer gave him was 6066, you know, three 6's means the Devil! That was strange!
Maybe he would have had to declare an emergency if he had that code. But seriously folks, the reasons for the emergencies were strange or shall I say unusual. That does not necessarily mean that the decisions to actually declare the emergency(perhaps I could have worded the title better to avoid misinterpretation by those likely to do so).

And for those in a fake tizzy, demanding to know where I work so they won't fly on that airline(as if it is really the case as I know you will buy the cheapest ticket), would you find it surprising if I told you UA.

Last edited by JammedStab; 27th Sep 2016 at 15:35.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2016, 07:20
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Declaring an emergency is a way to get from ATC what you want / need. It also gets you attention. They did the right thing, not getting cooperation from ATC for whatever reasons. If you don't get it, demand it.

Our airline preaches to declare emergency if we think we need it. If it turns out we don't, you can always downgrade it to a pan-pan.
Better safe than sorry - declaring an emergency is mostly paper work. And who doesn't love that, right?
INNflight is offline  
Old 26th Sep 2016, 11:48
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 58
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I overheard a United pilot at YYZ demand a new squawk code because the one the computer gave him was 6066, you know, three 6's means the Devil! That was strange!
squawk 1313
GearDown&Locked is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.