Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Boeing 787 engines

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Boeing 787 engines

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Sep 2016, 02:23
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
50 twin-engine 787's - One hundred installed T1000's. If retrofit is needed, it will also no doubt include spare engines. Any Idea how many spares?
I presume that it's OK to fly if no more than one engine per flight is at high risk

If a couple come off every day and a spare goes on per aircraft it doesn't seem like any more spares than usual are needed.

In the end the risk analysis should ensure that its extremely unlikely that more than one engine loses power or has to be shut down in the life of the retrofit program.

On the other hand if one becomes too aggressive in swapping out engines like two at a time. human error becomes a more significant risk
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2016, 15:31
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Based on ANA statements initial problem was noticed in long haul fleet, later found in short haul fleet. This contradicts initial reports claiming ANA high-cycle short haul was unique. What about other Trent 1000 operators.

RR fanboys are not happy with ANA demanding RR to fix all engines, same fanboys who quickly claimed GE was the reason for BA276@LAS.
notapilot15 is offline  
Old 9th Sep 2016, 18:00
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Who or what are "RR fanboys" ? Are they to be found in Thailand ?
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2016, 05:15
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hobbit
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Investigation: AO-2016-114 - Engine smoke involving Boeing 787, 9V-OFG, Melbourne Airport, Victoria, on 8 September 2016
Warm Ballast is offline  
Old 10th Sep 2016, 23:04
  #65 (permalink)  

OLD RED DAMASK
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lancashire born. In Cebu now
Age: 70
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is disturbing.......that one or two posters don't know the difference between Fan, Compressor & Turbine blades.
The guys from Barnoldswick always referred to the ones we treated as the main fan blades.
Did 500's, 700's and 1000's. Plus discs for the BR710 series. A lot of it has transferred to Singapore now.
lasernigel is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 00:04
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lasernigel,

Let's get the terminology correct. This thread isn't about fan blades, it is about an intermediate turbine blade that is apparently problem on the Trent 1000 as experienced by ANA.
Fan blades are in the very front of the engine and run cool. Turbine blades are towards the rear of the engine, aft of the combustor and run hot. Fan blades, some early stages of the compressor (low pressure) and some discs in the fan or early stages of the compressor may very well be made of titanium. In the turbine, there are no titanium blades, vanes or turbine discs because of the high temperatures being experienced. There may be titanium aluminide turbine blades in the very last stage of a five or six stage low pressure turbine of certain engines dependent on temperatures being experienced, but that is only because titanium aluminide has somewhat improved high temperature capability verses common titanium alloys.

Main fan blades are not intermediate turbine blades.
Turbine D is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 13:54
  #67 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lasernigel:
Worked for a company that used a l@ser to harden the 1000 blades. I can assure you that they are titanium.
Could you share with us the approximate dimensions of these blades?
barit1 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 14:15
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Canada
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to be some disagreement re the engine components. This may help: How jet engine is made - material, manufacture, history, used, parts, components, dimensions, product, industry and http://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=11454
Longtimer is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 17:44
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: flyover country USA
Age: 82
Posts: 4,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow. Ugh. The How Products Are Made article has several factual and historical errors that need to be addressed. I've seen better stuff in Popular Science.

I didn't even get as far as the manufacturing processes; i hope this section is more accurate & up-to-date.
barit1 is offline  
Old 11th Sep 2016, 18:28
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Well after reading the linked explanations above it would seem that you can't even trust the internet to know the differences between fan, compressor and turbine blade materials or manufacturing.

Now back to the thread subject. Suffice it to say that the Subject engine problems are turbine blades which are quite different in design, manufacturing, operation and repair from the blades in fans or compressors.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2016, 06:29
  #71 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
got to the "intricate feet of engineering" in the second sentence of that article and knew the rest wasn't worth reading!
p.j.m is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2016, 06:45
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by p.j.m
got to the "intricate feet of engineering" in the second sentence of that article and knew the rest wasn't worth reading!
Pity, apart from that one unfortunate typo/spellcheck fail the rest of the article is actually a pretty reasonable rundown on what materials are used in which parts of a turbofan.

As one might expect from a publication that specialises in Materials Science, in fact.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2016, 12:52
  #73 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Pity, apart from that one unfortunate typo/spellcheck fail the rest of the article is actually a pretty reasonable rundown on what materials are used in which parts of a turbofan.
They did fine with materials, but not the where they are used part, which seems to have misled some folks in this thread

I've yet to hear of a common usage of the "lost wax" process in compressor blades
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 12th Sep 2016, 18:42
  #74 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Middle America
Age: 84
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They did fine with materials, but not the where they are used part, which seems to have misled some folks in this thread
Except for the aluminum compressor blades which I am unaware of. I don't think they would fare well in a sandy environment due to erosion. Also, investment casting, aka, lost wax process, is not used for compressor blades for good reasons. Compressor blades are forged for mechanical property reasons, fatigue strength, grain control, etc., beyond what the investment casting process can produce.

Turbine blades are investment cast because of the high temperature materials now required. In the olden days, turbine blades were forged, but the forged alloys didn't have the higher temperature or the internal air-cooling sophistication capabilities that investment cast turbine blades can provide made with ceramic cores, forming the intricate internal cooling passages. Investment cast turbine blades can be produced with random equiax grain control, directionally solidified grain control or as a single crystal where the entire turbine blade contains no grain boundaries.

Fan blades have been made for many years using titanium alloys and forging processes. Today fan blades on newer engines are being produced using composite materials to reduce weight, improve strength and improve resistance to foreign object damage (bird strike, etc.).

Hope this information is helpful as the articles referenced left quite a bit to be desired and are misleading in some instances.
Turbine D is offline  
Old 13th Sep 2016, 10:13
  #75 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Age: 85
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
The challenge for forging turbine blades (in the old days) and turbine discs, is that the materials used are the ultimate available in resisting deformation at high temperature. Sort of Catch 22!
DType is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.