Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

The morons on 121.5. Authorities please act!

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

The morons on 121.5. Authorities please act!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2016, 17:09
  #161 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 422 Likes on 222 Posts
Maybe the UK authority could require professional offenders to be banned from the FIR, in conjunction with the relevant national one. That would make their eyes water.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 24th May 2016, 17:47
  #162 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Alaska, PNG, etc.
Age: 60
Posts: 1,550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ian W
As zkdli has said if you have a modern secondary radar fit with Mode S you will be squawking the equivalent of your airframe number -

Right, I know what Mode S is and what it does. I also know that there's plenty of planes without mode S. So again, someone starts making pig noises and it seems to be coming from an area with a couple of non-mode S 1200 squawks, none of which are talking to ATC, what call sign do you call out?
A Squared is offline  
Old 24th May 2016, 19:15
  #163 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you had really caused some incident the 'tapes would be pulled' i.e. the analysis recordings for the system would be impounded. Then someone would follow your 1200 squawk back to its origin. With origin and time from most airports you would be identified. Of course you would continue to be tracked and point of landing (if possible) identified.

Problem is you may think your rendering of a dyspeptic moose is particularly jovial - but the emergency controller who is trying to deal with an emergency somewhere else in the FIR that you cannot hear as the emergency aircraft is out of LOS, may get particularly miffed.
Ian W is offline  
Old 25th May 2016, 04:00
  #164 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: In da north country
Age: 62
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UK needs to find another dedicated frequency for practice DF steers.
The immature fart noise makers need to grow up.
Couple that with the accidental in range calls.
The occasional real emergency or PAN PAN
The fairly common mis handled frequency change/fly out of range issue
Air to air congestion compared to air to ground traffic.
And of course, the gossip mongers about the new bar to meet up in.

All these seem fairly minute separately , but when coupled all together, 121.5 is basically useless in the UK because most everyone has it turned down so they can monitor the active ATC frequency. I pity the poor soul that truly needs some help and can't raise anyone because everybody else has it turned down.
There are so many countries and operation departments within VHF range, that enough honest mistakes tacked upon all the unprofessional antics makes 121.5 not what it should be. Those that take this issue lightly need to sit back and reflect on this issue for a while.
It's not just the UK, but any HIGH traffic area in the world suffers from the same ailments. To me, the UK does seem to be the worst.
For the record, I spend less than 2% of my time flying in the USA.
Willit Run is offline  
Old 25th May 2016, 18:31
  #165 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: The wrong timezone
Posts: 269
Received 11 Likes on 3 Posts
because most everyone has it turned down so they can monitor the active ATC frequency
I think it's just you. Never turned it down or off myself, nor do any of my colleagues.
anson harris is online now  
Old 26th May 2016, 06:47
  #166 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Accruing MilliSiverts
Posts: 562
Received 20 Likes on 8 Posts
No it's not just him - it's me too and so do many of my colleagues. They have no choice.
121.5 is becoming useless.
Al E. Vator is offline  
Old 26th May 2016, 11:48
  #167 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If 121.5 is becoming "useless" then people should be filing occurrence reports to that effect - a few hundred of those going to the Authority might prompt some action. It's unlikely that complaining on here will make much difference.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 27th May 2016, 20:56
  #168 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
We were monitoring guard while an lost com intercept was happening.

The intercept aircraft were calling the aircraft on guard and when they finally answered some one with an English accent told the crew they were broadcasting on guard.

The military kindly told the english chap that he was performing an intercept and to basically 'shut the duck up.'

Was a good night had by all
mikk_13 is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 07:42
  #169 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The intercept aircraft were calling the aircraft on guard and when they finally answered some one with an English accent told the crew they were broadcasting on guard.

Isn't that exactly what 'Guard' is for? Don't some muppet pilots realise that? Obviously not. Reflecting on my career I do not remember ever being told the full use & etiquette of Guard. It was something I just picked up over time. However, it was a mixture of diverse opinions. Asking cadets what they knew about guard and the reply was it was an SOP to monitor it in case of losing ATC comms. That was it in their knowledge. It seems it was never in their airline training syllabus. Hence, perhaps, some of these ignorant, "you're on guard" responses.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 09:04
  #170 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's surely time to move away from the archaic anonymous VHF system. This is 2016. I have a phone in my pocket that can instantly identify my 'transmissions' as being from me and also give my location. That technology cost peanuts.

If the idiots abusing 121.5 for their juvenile amusement were immediately identifiable, it would stop - instantly. A small data packet accompanying each mic press is all that's needed.

Apart from the benefit of silencing the idiots, there would be others, e.g. the aircraft ATC is currently talking to could highlight on the ATCO's screen.

The technology is already here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-way_radio. Why are we still using 1950's radio tech in the most complex vehicles ever made ?
anengineer is offline  
Old 28th May 2016, 10:24
  #171 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Probably for the same reason that the US Military are still using floppy disks.
JW411 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 01:19
  #172 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by anengineer
It's surely time to move away from the archaic anonymous VHF system. This is 2016. I have a phone in my pocket that can instantly identify my 'transmissions' as being from me and also give my location. That technology cost peanuts.

If the idiots abusing 121.5 for their juvenile amusement were immediately identifiable, it would stop - instantly. A small data packet accompanying each mic press is all that's needed.

Apart from the benefit of silencing the idiots, there would be others, e.g. the aircraft ATC is currently talking to could highlight on the ATCO's screen.

The technology is already here - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-way_radio. Why are we still using 1950's radio tech in the most complex vehicles ever made ?
We are using archaic systems because of airline beancounters who want to see a 'monetized profit' from any change within 18 months.

There are multiple different ways of identifying 'the idiots' and also removing the change of frequency issues. But it is cheaper to have a standard VHF box or two on the flight deck and cheap wins _every_ time. Safety never comes first for a beancounter.
Ian W is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 07:33
  #173 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,840
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
121.5 is basically useless in the UK because most everyone has it turned down so they can monitor the active ATC frequency.
Yes. That’s my experience. I have it turned right down until at least in the cruise in UK airspace. I wouldn’t do that in China/Russia/Africa/USA, etc. but then we don’t have MiGs or weekend warriors in F16s looking to shoot at people...
FullWings is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 10:24
  #174 (permalink)  
RHS
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last night sort of took the biscuit for 121.500 idiocy.

First comment "anyone know the champions league score"

"1-0 Athletico"

Thus follows 5-10 minutes of near continuous Spanish back and forward, animal noises, hollering, and goaaaaaaaaaallll impressions.

Try not turning 121.5 down after that!
RHS is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 14:56
  #175 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: last time I looked I was still here.
Posts: 4,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those guys have been flying the Atlantic too much during NFL or baseball season. Why people can't wait to hear the news later on is beyond me. The world will still turn. For those of us who've set the recorder it's damn bad etiquette.
RAT 5 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 15:43
  #176 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Nirvana..HAHA..just kidding but,if you can tell me where it is!
Posts: 350
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I turn it down,regularly,....then,because of my age maybe,...forget to turn it up again.

Btw..if we could award points....the Choochoo train man,back in the early 2000s,over the western Atlantic,..id give them 10/10..

But the very best,most probably on 123.45 was the American lady,in southern drawl,...who came up with this gem..

"Heh guys,...do you know why we woman,...at the red stop lights,...always run our fingers through our hair?"
"Nope" came some obliging responders..
"Because we don't have no balls to scratch!"

Now, that was informative.....and well worth sharing...

JW411..(below).... Now,who would do such a dastardly thing!!!!!!..Did we ever fly together!

Last edited by Yaw String; 29th May 2016 at 18:09.
Yaw String is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 17:20
  #177 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I used to fly with a captain who would sometimes push the transmit button and set off the fire warning test bell at the same time round about 30W when eastbound across the Pond in the middle of the night.

I often wondered how many slumbering pilots that wakened up.
JW411 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 17:43
  #178 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,216
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by A Squared
Right, I know what Mode S is and what it does. I also know that there's plenty of planes without mode S. So again, someone starts making pig noises and it seems to be coming from an area with a couple of non-mode S 1200 squawks, none of which are talking to ATC, what call sign do you call out?
Isn't 1200 still "autonomous fighter operations" in the UK?
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 18:08
  #179 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,197
Received 394 Likes on 244 Posts
Originally Posted by JW411
Probably for the same reason that the US Military are still using floppy disks.
Actually, they aren't. What is being done is CD Media are being used to get around the vulnerability that USB ports created. not Floppy disks, per se.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 29th May 2016, 21:10
  #180 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Delta Capt in WATRS on Fri telling all about his "Navy" carrier landings and the virtues of the "Delta girls" ....gringeworthy.
t-bag is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.