Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Sonic Boom's Over West Yorkshire UK

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Sonic Boom's Over West Yorkshire UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:33
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,551
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
...was asked by Maastricht if we would agree to be intercepted for training purposes. Sure we were. Flying at FL470 with Mach 0.92 at that time.
"Go ahead, give it your best shot!".
Capn Bloggs is online now  
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: In a suitcase
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't think the RJ would have caused them any problems.

Heard the commotion as well, I personally always monitor guard, but I know many who turn it down or off especially over the UK. Constant chatter with practice and location fixes etc. I know there's no better way to train than to do, but it becomes a massive distraction. Why not assign a freq for practicing?
RightHandMan is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:46
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by PDR1
"Lost Comms" is one of the identified attack profiles for a hijacked aeroplane on a suicide mission. If you ever feel you want some company while flying on a lonely night just enter UK controlled airspace with no comms. You'll get a couple of instant buddies with a brace of white missiles to chat with...
I know it's all very exciting for those involved, and possible gets the station a picture in the national press, but really - Lost Comms has happened an infinite number of times compared to any mythical "suicide mission", besides which I can't think of any of the small handful that have occurred which gave enough time for any response to be effective. This applies particularly to an aircraft just following its filed flight plan. Whatever happened to a realistic Risk Assessment ?
WHBM is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:51
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Whatever happened to a realistic Risk Assessment ?
I think you will find it already exists. I understand each instance of loss of comms is evaluated in real time along with current threat state and many other factors before deciding whether to launch the interceptors.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:52
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Newcastle
Age: 53
Posts: 613
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Must be more to this than just lost comms.
MATELO is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 10:58
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Soon to be out of the EU.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well there was more than enough time to scramble and intercept the 9-11 jets. They were either in the wrong are, sent in the wrong direction or wasting time getting approval to take the necessary action.

The RAF did exactly what they should be and that this protecting the country. This is how you keep people safe, not bombing the Middle East to within an inch of its life. Having jets ready, armed and with the appropriate authority to do what's needed is far safer.

I do wonder what went wrong. Lots of frequency changes as you head north, the requirement to descend early to be FL280 by a certain point. Switching to Scottish. Not to mention the sound of others on frequency.
HeartyMeatballs is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 11:15
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is not the first time loss of comm and fighter jet intercept.

I have a feeling in post MH370 world supersonic intercept will be a norm if plane heading out to open seas, assuming country has quick/rapid action force and mid-air refueling capabilities. If I recall similar incident happened over France last year.

Even though MH370 presumed to crisscross the nation and almost over an airbase, they couldn't intercept because it had very few active all weather, mid air refuel capable fighter jets, and they were on the other side of the country.

Why so much media coverage. Contemplating between Brexit preparedness (or) Gripen vs Typhoon marketing.
notapilot15 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 11:43
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 43N
Posts: 182
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Tea no bikkies with the DFO? (The sans biscuit?)
Koan is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 12:07
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: UK sometimes
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the rj85 in question was doing .80 to .84 then that is a serious cause for concern!
RB311 is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 13:24
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Originally Posted by fireflybob
Tea and no biscuits, mon ami?
Although an Air France flight number, this flight is actually operated by our old friends from London City, CityJet, with an RJ85. Aircraft EI-RJC on the flight in question, I believe. Well, I presume the RAF never got close enough to report the airline livery. And it was dark by then as well.
WHBM is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 13:37
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Southampton
Posts: 125
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wasn't familiar with the term QRA and ran across this excellent television piece on the mission:

https://youtu.be/3hijzP1zzLI
Excellent - thanks.
Tech Guy is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 14:49
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"The 'Q' in 'QRA' does not stand for 'Quiet'!"
Just give it time and maybe it will. I'm sure there will soon be a demand for an analysis of how many carbon credits were used by the interceptors and questions of who will plant the trees for each mission to compensate.

Years ago there were charted VFR low level military training routes in the U.S. that had the designation 'Oil Burner'. The Arab oil embargo in 1973 came along and the media activists (embedded as journalists) highlighted these OB routes as an example of environmental and economic insensitivity by the mean uncaring Pentagon war machine.

To assuage the desires of these 'whistleblowers' the training routes were renamed Olive Branch Routes. Nobody could oppose peace, right?

Military Jet Noise - The Sound of Freedom.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 18:00
  #33 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 80
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Royal Flights have one of the highest air traffic priorities with their own airspace zone. There is one higher, guess which one.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 18:13
  #34 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 418 Likes on 221 Posts
"The 'Q' in 'QRA' does not stand for 'Quiet'!"
You'd think the RAF would fit silencers to stop those sonic booms.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 21:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The problem is, that the visit is not mandatory, hence it is unlikely to happen.
They are called throttles
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 3rd May 2016, 22:09
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: London
Age: 53
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(off topic) priority

Royal Flights have one of the highest air traffic priorities with their own airspace zone. There is one higher, guess which one.
Category A?
douglasheld is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 00:42
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Australia
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Too close to Fylingdales? - no comms - scramble QRA SOP
AI23B is offline  
Old 4th May 2016, 06:11
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,549
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The UK's a bit small and the Fylingdales restricted area is even smaller, and embedded in the open FIR. Plenty of stuff goes around it at medium/low level and even over it at high level every day.

I suspect if QRA scrambled for every single non-communicating aircraft that got near the restricted area they'd be kept somewhat busy.

It's even rumoured that over the years more than one solo student, slightly uncertain of position may have got a bit closer than they should done....
wiggy is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 08:02
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: cheshire
Age: 69
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by highflyer40
Authority to go supersonic for lost comms? Really!

Someone needs to rethink what is "exceptional circumstances"
Loss of communications is one of the first indicators that an aircraft is not "compliant" and may have been interfered with.....as in 9/11.
skyman01 is offline  
Old 5th May 2016, 13:24
  #40 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Is there much documented history about the negative effects of sonic booms?
G-CPTN is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.