Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Drone strike

Old 17th Apr 2016, 18:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: under the sea
Posts: 2,275
Drone strike

Sky news are reporting that an aircraft inbound to EGLL from LSGG had a drone strike today whilst on approach
tubby linton is online now  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 18:17
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1
I'm surprised its took this long for this inevitability to happen.
Halewood is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 18:31
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: EGMH
Posts: 207
According to various news sources the plane was inspected and cleared to fly following the incident.


Edit: looking at FR it could have been A320 BA727 which landed around 12:30 today. I'm not certain of that.

Last edited by susier; 17th Apr 2016 at 18:44.
susier is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 18:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 19
This particular incident appears to have been harmless.

But it does serve to further underline the issue that drones present a very real and immediate danger to commercial aviation.

Like I say, this incident was harmless, but it doesn't take too much imagination to consider what a person with malicious intent and an armed drone could achieve.
Kitiara is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:11
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: inv
Posts: 274
link to story on BBC

Drone hit British Airways plane approaching Heathrow Airport - BBC News
scr1 is online now  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,400
How can anybody possibly use this event as proof that drones are bad news?

We all knew that there would eventually be a collision. That is simply a function of number of objects in the air that are not de-conflicted.

We have now had the first event of it's type, and from all reports the aircraft was looked at and then signed off to continue.

This, if anything, suggests that the doom mongers are over-egging things.

Drone hits plane.
Plane not damaged.
Initial indications from an initially miniscule research set suggests that drone strikes do not hurt aircraft. As more collisions happen, I'm quite sure that eventually one will go down an engine. That will be more indicative of whether there is actually a problem.

What we need is not silly hysteria.
We need somebody to test engines against drones like we do against birds.
Tourist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 50
Posts: 1,609
There are rules. Just no way of enforcing them.
That will change when someone gets hurt.
FE Hoppy is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:33
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: EGMH
Posts: 207
Tourist, what do you think would happen were a drone to be ingested by an engine?


What happened to Sullenberger's A320?


I concur that this incident doesn't demonstrate the capacity of a drone to bring down an airliner.


It certainly, however, doesn't demonstrate that a drone cannot bring down an airliner.


All it really demonstrates is that planes can collide with drones. Which is obviously a concern.


I see no hysteria here. There may be some in wider media obviously.
susier is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:34
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sussex
Age: 60
Posts: 3
@Tourist


So what you are saying is that manufacturers need to spend huge amounts of money on testing for drone strikes to certify every single aircraft and engine in service now and in future?


I'm sure airlines and manufacturers will be jumping for joy at the prospect.
Uberteknik is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:37
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Brasil
Age: 37
Posts: 127
Have any engine manufcturers chucked one in to a running engine yet to see what happens?
JumpJumpJump is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:43
  #11 (permalink)  

Sly Lowlife Freight
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Surrey, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 90
Originally Posted by 7-cylinder man
Let's not forget what a small tile did for a space shuttle during launch.
I'm struggling to think of an airport anywhere in the world that involves atmospheric re-entry.
Tony Flynn is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:44
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,023
Tourist......

"We need someone to test engines against drones like we do against birds"

Will you be happy to stump up the money for this pointless research then?
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 49
The drone will have downloaded the impact sequence video to someone's iPad. That someone, (albeing stupid) will share it with others, just like rhino poachers do. It will be the drone operator's El Dorado moment. Within 2 days, I expect it will go viral and Plod will feel a collar in Hounslow.
enola-gay is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:50
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,023
Seeing as this is an encounter between an aircraft and an 'RPAS', is this officially the first mid-air collision in U.K. controlled airspace..........for a very long time?

If so, it's a sad day indeed.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:51
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
A turboprop into one of these won't be pretty:


peekay4 is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 19:54
  #16 (permalink)  
RHS
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 103
Tourist, have you seen the size of some of these drones? I would bet my bottom dollar that this was one of the smaller commercial drones, but some of the larger professional models would be like hitting a garbage bin.

I for one don't fancy going to work tomorrow and being the unfortunate pilot who hits a drone and becomes the first accident.
RHS is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 20:00
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Brum
Posts: 625
Peekay4 - I think it's highley unlikley you'll find a UAV of that kind in the hands of a nutter on the approach to Heathrow...
Nige321 is online now  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 20:15
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,400
Originally Posted by ZOOKER View Post
Tourist......

"We need someone to test engines against drones like we do against birds"

Will you be happy to stump up the money for this pointless research then?
Nope.

Why should I?

I'm happy to have drones buzzing around, just like I'm happy to have birds flying around.
Those who regulate these things should do some scientific research about the actual rather than perceived risks.
Or, just wait and see.
If they are truly a big risk, then the tombstone imperative will pave the way.
My personal opinion is that these are in the bird strike risk category. All part of the natural risks of life.
Tourist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 20:16
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,400
The simple fact is that the score is currently 1/0 to the "drones don't damage big aircraft" point of view.
Tourist is offline  
Old 17th Apr 2016, 20:21
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: EICK
Age: 43
Posts: 24
Watershed moment I hope. Gone way too far already. Time for a 100 mile(minimum) exclusion zone. Sooner somebody gets hauled up the better.
Maxan_Murphy is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.