Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

B-738 Crash in Russia Rostov-on-Don

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

B-738 Crash in Russia Rostov-on-Don

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1st Apr 2016, 13:56
  #1021 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
anyone who knowly released information concerning secure investigation data
Agree, but unfortunately people feels at ease with non-military secrets (and military too) lately. There is no cases when somebody was severely punished for such things in the last 25 years.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 14:01
  #1022 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kopavogur
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know about other companies, but I work for a large B744 ACMI operator...

During type-rating, done in-house, the first 3 sessions are completely devoted to manual ( raw data) flying, including all sorts of upset and stall scenarios.

Most approaches are A/P Off when conditions allow, also Raw-Data allowed.

Is this not done in other companies anymore?!
Icelanta is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 18:19
  #1023 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
QAR

It is perhaps unlikely that any QAR mem cards were recovered intact. Not only do these provide a lot more data than DFDR`s, they also help avoid incidents and accidents, particularly when it comes to non reported systems glitches.
I wonder what the company policy was in this instance.
Chronus is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 18:29
  #1024 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: East of Java
Posts: 21
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
aterpster - read the annex. in the language of the state of occurence, with translation into at least one of the ICAO languages, usually English.
Toshirozero is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 18:30
  #1025 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re, "I wonder what the company policy was in this instance."

Was the airline even running an FDM Program at all? Doesn't sound like it.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 18:47
  #1026 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
It is perhaps unlikely that any QAR mem cards were recovered intact. Not only do these provide a lot more data than DFDR`s, they also help avoid incidents and accidents, particularly when it comes to non reported systems glitches.
Just as about as helpful as your computer windoze error log with no linking to the exact time and what your were trying to do at the time even though they often survive if you have the wherewithal to search for them.
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 18:56
  #1027 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PJ2
Re, "I wonder what the company policy was in this instance."

Was the airline even running an FDM Program at all? Doesn't sound like it.
Emirates say they do and if so no reason why Fly Dubai should be an exception I would have thought, but I stand to be corrected of course.
Chronus is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 19:24
  #1028 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Philippines
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the first 3 sessions are completely devoted to manual
That should last a lifetime then ... ?!?!

Just when I thought there were issues with pilot training and standards ...

I did over 2,000 hours of manual flying before I went anywhere near an automatic aeroplane.

There was a time when I happily boarded my holiday jet with my family and off we went without a care in the World ...

Now I seriously consider - are the pilots fatigued, can they fly an aeroplane and are they sane ... ?!?!?

And don't say this is scare-mongering after AF447, FlyDubai and GermanWings ... (oh, and maybe MH370 and the ATR that crashed inverted into a river).

It's rapidly getting to the stage where you have to think that if there's a failure of the automatics the result is likely to be an accident - whereas it used to be 'in the event of an emergency ditch the automatics and fly the aeroplane ...'.

Accidents are now being caused by pilot FAILURE rather than pilot ERROR ...
SpannerInTheWerks is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 20:03
  #1029 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Just off the Persian gulf
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PJ2 - Doesn't sound like they're running an FDM program? What makes you say that?
I can confirm that FZ do have an FDM program.
seven3heaven is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 20:18
  #1030 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did over 2,000 hours of manual flying before I went anywhere near an automatic aeroplane.

There was a time when I happily boarded my holiday jet with my family and off we went without a care in the World ...
Ignorance is bliss...

Despite many problems, air transport is much safer today vs. all those years ago.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 20:20
  #1031 (permalink)  
PJ2
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: BC
Age: 76
Posts: 2,484
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
seven3heaven, thanks very much for the confirmation. FWIW, I think it says something very positive about a carrier that runs an FDM Program.
PJ2 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 21:44
  #1032 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Despite many problems, air transport is much safer today vs. all those years ag
Mmm depends what you mean by safe.

It's not necessarily the accident rate that counts but the reasons why the accidents (however few) are occurring. Quite a few in the last few years give cause for concern.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 22:43
  #1033 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm - we have definitely improved safety over the last 20 years but most of the low hanging fruit has been picked by innovations such as TCAS and GPWS.

Fatalities per passenger mile have fallen consistently year on year but the number of fatal accidents has stagnated simply because the number of flights has grown. In other words we are a lot safer but we still have accidents grabbing the headlines.

The problem now is that the easier things have been fixed and we are left with the rare outlyers. The causes are varied and complex, often involving human factors.

The days of inventing a gadget to eliminate a risk are gone, we now need to tackle the unintended consequences of the technology which has improved safety.

To take a current example, there is a real risk that encouraging more hand flying could degrade safety rather than improving it. Nobody knows the answers to such questions.

Last edited by The Ancient Geek; 1st Apr 2016 at 22:58.
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 23:18
  #1034 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Petersburg
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
so. Thank you, Kulverstukas.
220 - 900 there was observed /we won't tell you how/ the movement of the stabilizer on the dive in the result of which - at the height of about 1000 metres, the aircraft went into dive


Next, our priority becomes. our work will be focused on


on the study of the work of the longitudinal aircraft control system and on the evaluation of the actions of the crew during the missed approach.
Alice025 is offline  
Old 1st Apr 2016, 23:40
  #1035 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Petersburg
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The preliminary report ends by:


"Short-term recommendations:

- Deliver the information about the aviation accident to the pilots and technical staff, operating Boeing 737-800 aircraft

- Research the procedure of the missed approach - conducted in various conditions, from different heights, in manual mode of operation, at two working engines

- Add missed approach in various conditions, in manual mode of operation, with two working emgines, conducted from different heights, to the FFS (flight simulation training device) simulator training programme."
________
Accidents Investigation commission of the Interstate Aviation Committee
Alice025 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 00:12
  #1036 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Paso Robles
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite a few in the last few years give cause for concern.
No more or less concern than in any previous chapter of aviation history.
porterhouse is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 00:16
  #1037 (permalink)  
PBY
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Around the corner
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When British Airways does not allow pilots manual flying, only once a year in the simulator, when most of the pilots cannot fly basic heading, altitude, speed witin the limits without flight directors, when management believes, that practising manual flying on a nice sunny afternoon could be dangerous, how the heck do you expect crews to manually fly a go around in case of automation fault?
PBY is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 00:30
  #1038 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Toshirozero:

aterpster - read the annex. in the language of the state of occurence, with translation into at least one of the ICAO languages, usually English.
Thank you for answering my question. I don't have the annex.
aterpster is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 00:42
  #1039 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
peekay4:

gnorance is bliss...

Despite many problems, air transport is much safer today vs. all those years ago.
Nonetheless, his points are well taken.

Now, the industry is upset by lack of upset training. (bad pun)

Yet, Boeing now disclaims disconnect of A/T in their latest birds.

There comes a point where the automatics need to be disconnected in favor of attitude instrument flying. But, my presumption is based upon competency in attitude instrument flying.

My presumption is probably lacking in some segments of the industry.
aterpster is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2016, 01:05
  #1040 (permalink)  
PBY
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Around the corner
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So British Airways management in their ultimate wisdom prevents pilots from manually flying the aircraft on the line. Than, just because they feel this measure is not enough to eradicate basic manual flying skills, they reduce the frequency from two sims a year to one sim. And I am sure it is backed up by some kind of a study, that it does not effect the safety. If this is happening in legacy carrier, what is happening elsewhere?
May be we should introduce a new profficiency called "attitude flying" and at least one pilot in the cockpit should have this qualification "unexpired"
May be a pilot error should be called management-pilot error. Because he pilot is usually dead after the accident and there is nothing to improve anymore.
But the systemic management incompetency could be improved upon.
And we would have less management-pilot errors in the future.
PBY is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.