Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A321 explosion at Mogadishu

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A321 explosion at Mogadishu

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2016, 12:23
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilot was Vladimir Vodopivec (64) from Belgrade, Serbia.

Edited Google translation from very early Serbian media news, here:

EKSKLUZIVNO Srpski pilot spasao putnike posle eksplozije u avionu

EXCLUSIVE Serbian pilot rescued passengers on the plane after the explosion.

Pilot Vladimir Vodopivec (64) from Belgrade has managed this morning to safely lanad the plane with 74 passengers and crew at the airport in Mogadishu in Somalia after an explosion blew off part of the fuselage near the right wing of the aircraft, 'Blic' learns. International media assess that the pilot "did impossible work", because the incident passed without casualties.

- Half an hour after we took off from the airport in Somalia, at 3,300 meters high there was a terrible explosion. Passengers began to cry, and I immediately went back to the airport. Fortunately, no one was seriously injured - says Vladimir Vodopivec.

...

Experienced pilot had similar thoughts.

- I think it was a bomb, but fortunately it did not damage the control system, so I was able to come back and I land at the airport. This had never happened to me. We lost cabin pressure. Thank God everything ended well - said Vodopivec immediately after the incident to his friend.

Vodopivec, born in Belgrade, is an experienced pilot who worked in Yugoslavian and than Serbian JAT, then in "Montenegro Airlines", and in recent years in Africa, as employed in the "Dalo Airlines". Soon, says his friend, he would retire.

PaleBlueDot is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2016, 12:28
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Montenegro
Age: 41
Posts: 339
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
the pilot is an experienced 64yo Captain Vlatko Vodopivec that worked for JAT and Montenegro Airlnes, flown with him couple of times, his voice is convincing
AreOut is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2016, 12:40
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Ever since the ill fated Comet series early on, virtually every commercial passenger airplane has been designed with multiple crack stoppers, redundant load paths, etc. IOW the plane does NOT disintegrate like a punctured balloon simply due to overpressure OR a blown out panel/window, etc. And no - gert frobe type in a bond movie will not be squeezed thru a window.
While I agree with everything here regarding the ability to maintain airworthiness, the statement about pax vulnerability seems open to question.

    For more details.
    Carbon Bootprint is offline  
    Old 3rd Feb 2016, 13:01
      #44 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Europe
    Posts: 23
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


    "Somalia's ambassador to the United Nations, Awale Kullane, was on board the plane, Reuters news agency reported. He posted video of the incident on Facebook."

    https://youtu.be/jMHWd5Mhh1g

    Somalia investigates possible bomb blast on airliner - Al Jazeera English
    PaleBlueDot is offline  
    Old 3rd Feb 2016, 15:20
      #45 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: Home soon
    Posts: 0
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    It obviously wasnt caused by a bad food fart.
    Now,having never flown in and out of there,I guess airlines would stop serving that city/country until proper screening is done?
    de facto is offline  
    Old 3rd Feb 2016, 19:26
      #46 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Nov 2011
    Location: england
    Age: 50
    Posts: 12
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    well knowing the Somali aviation authorities, the investigation will take the shape of " nothing happened, move along nothing here to see "


    You are spot on about Turkish as I stated earlier. There is a lot more to this that I cant go into.


    I do think the international community need to take the lead with this and take a good hard look at procedures in place, security wise and the real reasons behind this.
    dakota_bandit is offline  
    Old 3rd Feb 2016, 21:53
      #47 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Europe
    Posts: 23
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Plane departure was delayed for one hour. Assuming timed device, if it was on schedule, explosion would have happened at cruise altitude, not at 3300 meters.
    PaleBlueDot is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 03:06
      #48 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Dec 2001
    Location: what U.S. calls ´old Europe´
    Posts: 941
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Ever since the ill fated Comet series early on, virtually every commercial passenger airplane has been designed with multiple crack stoppers, redundant load paths, etc. IOW the plane does NOT disintegrate like a punctured balloon simply due to overpressure
    Looking at the crack protuding more than one frame forward, this might have already been far beyond the required damage tolerance capability and that crack my have grown up to the door if the fuselage would have been fully pressurized...
    Crack stoppers are required to stop a two bay crack (one frame/one stringer lost, two skin panels cracked). Initial damage beyond this might indeed cause full desintegration.
    Volume is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 06:44
      #49 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Nov 2011
    Location: Japan
    Posts: 1,951
    Received 143 Likes on 86 Posts
    Many major news sites are beginning to accept that beside the two injured passengers, one male passenger in his 50s was lost through the gap, and his body is being brought to Mogadishu.
    jolihokistix is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 11:16
      #50 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: uk
    Posts: 579
    Likes: 0
    Received 1 Like on 1 Post
    From the position of the damage it doesn't appear that the device was either at floor level or in an overhead locker, rather at torso level of a seated passenger. This could imply various things, from an deliberately fired explosive hidden on the person of a pax to a grenade accidentally detonated in someone's pocket - and Mog is a place where grenades are routinely carried. None of these obviously lend themselves to being a timed device. The choice of position, right over the wing, the strongest point of any aircraft, also does not indicate a bomber with much clue of optimising his efforts. If you had the gumption to make an explosive belt wouldn't you also know enough to set it off somewhere more vulnerable, or instruct your drone to do so?
    Wageslave is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 11:50
      #51 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Nov 2015
    Location: Europe/Africa, depends on work
    Posts: 1
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    location of explosion

    How about, as was suggested for the crash in Egypt, something stuffed in a life jacket pouch under a seat? That's below window level, pretty much at the level of the centre of the hole.
    Dusty Passenger is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 12:26
      #52 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2013
    Location: down under
    Posts: 463
    Received 10 Likes on 5 Posts
    I think that until there is some evidence, it's unfair to conclude that the deceased passenger was the bomber.
    cooperplace is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 12:46
      #53 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Jun 1999
    Location: world
    Posts: 3,424
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    How about, as was suggested for the crash in Egypt, something stuffed in a life jacket pouch under a seat?
    I was thinking the same. How often are these areas thoroughly checked (in terms of the life jacket being there I mean)? And when they are checked, I would doubt that it would be more than just a perfunctory check (quick "feel" check).

    I'm also curious as to how long the aircraft was on the ground prior to departure? Had it night stopped?
    Hotel Tango is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 13:33
      #54 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Oct 2015
    Location: USA
    Posts: 2
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    You might notice most of the stains on the outside of the airplane seem to originate from the bottom of the hole then sweep upward along the path of the airflow over the wing. That would suggest to this untrained observer the initial punch through was there, and the balance of the hole might have been simple propagation of the failure. If that's true we can be glad the airplane was still climbing at a relatively low speed -- 350 knot winds could have done some serious peel back of the skin. .
    anjowa is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 14:22
      #55 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Mar 2014
    Location: WA STATE
    Age: 78
    Posts: 0
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Damage tolerance and luck

    See photo at # 40 for a bit more damage - and many improvements have been made since then in structural analysis.

    Looking at the crack protuding more than one frame forward, this might have already been far beyond the required damage tolerance capability and that crack my have grown up to the door if the fuselage would have been fully pressurized...
    Crack stoppers are required to stop a two bay crack (one frame/one stringer lost, two skin panels cracked). Initial damage beyond this might indeed cause full desintegration.
    CONSO is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 14:34
      #56 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Mar 2014
    Location: WA STATE
    Age: 78
    Posts: 0
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Other decompression issues

    Interesting article in Seattle Times today

    Timeline: 8 emergency landings after explosions, structural damage | The Seattle Times

    Originally published February 3, 2016 at 2:22 pmUpdated February 4, 2016 at 6:23 am
    A pilot who made an emergency landing in Somalia’s capital after an explosion blew a hole through a jetliner says things would have been much worse had the blast occurred at a higher altitude. That’s because it could have led to explosive decompression on the Daallo Airlines-operated plane, which might have caused more severe structural damage and would have forced a faster descent because of limited supplies of oxygen to the passengers. The pilot said the explosion Tuesday was believed to have been caused by a bomb, but investigators have reached no conclusions. One man was missing but the other 73 passengers got off safely after the Airbus 321 landed.
    Goes on listing other similar incidents

    Includes pics of the Hawaii convertible 737
    CONSO is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 15:39
      #57 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Mar 2002
    Location: Florida
    Posts: 4,569
    Likes: 0
    Received 1 Like on 1 Post
    I agree that the news is touting the pilots words about the luck of the explosion at lower altitude. However I fail to see a structural tie-in with this fact. Simply citing past incidents with different outcomes does not justify a conclusion.

    Pressure differentials and blow-down rates need be considered vs structural concerns and routings of critical control cables etc.

    I hope that we don't get too deep into this as it only helps the bad guys
    lomapaseo is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 15:49
      #58 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Dec 2007
    Location: Itinerant
    Posts: 828
    Received 77 Likes on 13 Posts
    I hope that we don't get too deep into this as it only helps the bad guys
    I agree with lomapaseo here. One of the most significant hazards to aviation safety and security today (to safety and security generally) arises directly from the vast amount of information available via the internet. We can't prevent much of it but we certainly shouldn't be contributing to it.
    grizzled is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 16:12
      #59 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Apr 2010
    Location: London
    Posts: 7,072
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    I think the pilot & crew deserve congrats - it sounds like a text book handling of a very non-standard occurrence

    kept calm, got people away from the damage and landed in one piece

    just goes to show good people aren't just with the big airlines......
    Heathrow Harry is offline  
    Old 4th Feb 2016, 16:50
      #60 (permalink)  
     
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Europe
    Posts: 23
    Likes: 0
    Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
    Yes, they did a great job. And just look at composition of that group: The flight crew included Serbian pilot, Italian co-pilot, two flight attendants from Greece, two from Kenya and one from Bosnia.

    "When we heard a loud bang, the co-pilot went back to the cabin to inspect the damage, and I took over the commands as the procedure demands," the Serbian pilot told AP, adding that the engines and hydraulics functioned normally so he had no problem flying the aircraft back to Mogadishu.

    "Smoke came into the cockpit, but it was mostly concentrated in the back of the aircraft," he said by phone. "The stewardesses did a great job calming down the passengers and following the emergency procedure."

    Kullane, Somalia's deputy ambassador to the United Nations, said in a social media post that he "heard a loud noise and couldn't see anything but smoke for a few seconds." When visibility returned, he realized "a chunk" of the plane was missing.

    "I think for the first few seconds and minutes ... I was terrified and most people were terrified," he said. "Of course, we give credit to the pilot who landed that plane."
    PaleBlueDot is offline  


    Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

    Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.