Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airbus wants to build 'shipping container' cabins that detach from planes

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airbus wants to build 'shipping container' cabins that detach from planes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Nov 2015, 09:41
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: SE England
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Airbus wants to build 'shipping container' cabins that detach from planes

Mmmmm ????
a1anx is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 09:47
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would be a sad to lose the acronym SLF in favour of a description such as "containerised warmware".
sarabande is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:05
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Netherlands/UK
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like a very innovative idea. Assuming it is a concept for short haul aircraft(?) - is it feasible that airports will get on board and provide the infrastructure?

Great idea will be interesting to see how/if this develops.
MattC123 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: BRS/GVA
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My only reservation is that the cigar tube pressure vessel is almost the strongest (barring a sphere). We know the problems that early 747s had with fatigue on the flat sections of the upper deck. Also the loss of strength in the overall fuselage would surely require extra strengthening and therefore weight..
Seems like a speculative patent to me rather than a ner-future reality.
hoss183 is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:28
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Australia
Posts: 543
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Yanks tried that back in the 1950s. Was it Fairchild? A big weight penalty with all the required attachment points, but probably not as critical today with modern engines as it was with a couple of straining reciprocals.

The XC-120 Packplane https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairch...-120_Packplane
MTOW is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
stick a couple of explosive bolts and parachutes on it and it could be jettisoned in case of emergency.
WNTT is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:31
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never going to happen. Way too heavy with all the flight and pressure loads that have to be transferred for a marginal operational advantage.
procede is offline  
Old 27th Nov 2015, 10:37
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Asia
Age: 62
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also becomes dependent in airports having serviceable infrastructure. It's bad enough having to wait for airbridges now, I can just imagine how often people will be stuck in pods due to faulty equipment.
bud leon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.