Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Turkish F16 shoots down unidentified aircraft in their airspace.

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Turkish F16 shoots down unidentified aircraft in their airspace.

Old 24th Nov 2015, 22:43
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AreOut
but after 10 days or so I wouldn't want to be in Turkey or anywhere close for that matter
Why is that?
glad rag is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 22:50
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Under a rock
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any word on what missile was used for the shoot down?
AC560 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:10
  #123 (permalink)  
Paxing All Over The World
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hertfordshire, UK.
Age: 67
Posts: 10,143
Received 62 Likes on 50 Posts
Perhaps a video of pilots being shot, whilst parachuting to 'safety' was considered unkind and cruel? Just because the video is available on other sites, does not mean that a pilot's discussion forum wants to host it.
PAXboy is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:19
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Montenegro
Age: 41
Posts: 339
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Why is that?
because there certainly will be some kind of military retaliation, it likely (and hopefully) will not be a full-scale war but I can't see Putin backing off, especially because they state the plane didn't violate turkish airspace at all(personally I think it did for a couple of seconds but it's important what they state not us here on R&N) which would mean they have a casus belli...
AreOut is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:31
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Near St Lawrence River
Age: 53
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
17 seconds

https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status...rc=twsrc%5Etfw
Is there enough time for intercept, lock and missile travel (at M2.5), all inside Turkey's airspace?
_Phoenix is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:33
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Alternative Universe
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Analysis of the Turkish behavior by Gen. Tom McInerney on Fox News, calling the action overly aggressive

If a former NORAD commander interviewed by Fox says the action was unjustified, it surely was...

What will Putin do? He has to do something in order to maintain his image of "strength and power" at home and abroad.
Standard Toaster is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:34
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bosphorus and Russian access

by Photonic http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...ml#post9190645

Bosphorus is a free international waterway, turkey preventing its use by anyone would be illegal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters


Several international treaties have established freedom of navigation on semi-enclosed seas.

The Copenhagen Convention of 1857 opened access to the Baltic by abolishing the Sound Dues and making the Danish Straits an international waterway free to all commercial and military shipping.

Several conventions have opened the Bosporus and Dardanelles to shipping. The latest, the Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Turkish Straits, maintains the straits' status as an international waterway.

Other international treaties have opened up rivers, which are not traditionally international waterways.
The Danube River is an international waterway so that landlocked Austria, Hungary, Serbia, and Slovakia can have secure access to the Black Sea.

Last edited by oldoberon; 25th Nov 2015 at 00:27.
oldoberon is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2015, 23:55
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Norfolk
Age: 67
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I fail to see how Russia will not gain enormous political advantage from this shoot down incident. Russia has been mounting air strikes in Syria in support of President Assad and the official Syrian Government Forces. NATO has been selectively arming various rebel groups fighting against President Assad as well as ISIS and has actively been trying to overthrow the Syrian government.

So whatever way you care to look at it, by shooting down a Russian fighter, Turkey (or Turkish supported rebels) have lost any moral high ground they might have claimed. They have to all intents and purposes shot down an allied aircraft in the fight against ISIS, which makes them, and any supporting NATO countries the bad guys.

Whatever the truth of the incursion into Turkish airspace, the missile that brought down the aircraft was fired from within Syrian airspace and the crash site was within Syria.

The Turks have asserted their authority over their airspace, but made themselves look very bad in doing so. Russia has tragically lost two pilots, but in the overall scheme of things have come out massively ahead in terms of political kudos.

Last edited by G0ULI; 24th Nov 2015 at 23:57. Reason: spelling
G0ULI is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 00:05
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,179
Received 377 Likes on 231 Posts
Originally Posted by Standard Toaster
Analysis of the Turkish behavior by Gen. Tom McInerney on Fox News, calling the action overly aggressive

If a former NORAD commander interviewed by Fox says the action was unjustified, it surely was...
Really? Who pays his check? What is their motivation? He's a retired general. Make sure to add a grain of salt to such utterances.

I am a retired Commander. Likewise add a grain of salt to mine, but I have less to gain as Fox won't pay me thousands of dollars for my two bits.

Question to PPRuNe: what is the impact of this uncertainty to air travel in the region?
Discussion of that is surely on topic.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 00:07
  #130 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,179
Received 377 Likes on 231 Posts
Originally Posted by oldoberon
by Photonic http://www.pprune.org/rumours-news/5...ml#post9190645

Bosphorus is a free international waterway, turkey preventing its use by anyonne would be illegal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_waters
Please cite the Montreaux Convention to complete your thought, as it applies to the Turkish Straits in detail. I've been through them a few times on ships of war.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 00:28
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It is in my quote but now in bold and red, those wishing to read it should use the link within the wiki link
oldoberon is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 01:56
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,179
Received 377 Likes on 231 Posts
Originally Posted by oldoberon
It is in my quote but now in bold and red, those wishing to read it should use the link within the wiki link
A direct cite is far more appropriate, since it is Turkey who is now involved, so I provided one in my post. That convention is of a similar vintage to the various lines on the map that left the Middle East in the strange situation that it is in to this day.

That convention, however, doesn't apply all that much to air power and flying beyond how it applies to aircraft embarked on ships that transit the straits.

For PPRuNe purposes, we might be better off addressing the influence on air operations, air travel, and the airspace in the region as matters of interest to the intended audience.

Just a thought.
Lonewolf_50 is online now  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 03:49
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: NO
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Standard Toaster
If a former NORAD commander interviewed by Fox says the action was unjustified, it surely was...
For what it's worth, a Commander with the media group of the Norwegian Defence University College said something similar on national TV Tuesday night. More precisely his comment was that "many would say it was an overreaction" to shoot down an aircraft transiting a tiny bit of airspace with no hostile intentions. He also said it has to be regarded as a Turkish action more than a Nato action. He also said Russia has been provoking Turkey for the past month and a half, but this incursion may well have been a mistake. Hardly a Nato spokesperson, but I wouldn't think the Secretary General's home country put a dissenter on the screen either.
RYFQB is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 05:29
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: moon
Posts: 3,564
Received 89 Likes on 32 Posts
lone wolf:

The ripple effect of this will take a week or two to play out, but the longer term issues are beginning to concern me.
the long term issues are frightening. Turkey has declared itself a supporter of ISIS. Russia is now going to go after turkeys child -ISIS even harder.

Whatever one says about sovereignty, the russian aircraft vectors were never pointed at a Turkish target, in fact whichever map you use, the russian aircraft was exiting Turkish airspace when it was hit.

If Turkey tries this again, then watch out.

As an aside, Erdogan's son had better have a good bodyguard.
Sunfish is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 07:21
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They have to all intents and purposes shot down an allied aircraft in the fight against ISIS, which makes them, and any supporting NATO countries the bad guys.
I registered just to refute this.

(1) Russian planes have been striking Turkmen targets in Latakia province near the Turkish border.
(2) Turkmen have been fighting alongside the Free Syrian Army (the "moderate" rebels), not ISIS.
(3) Nor is ISIS at all operating along that stretch of the border.
(4) Russian maneuvers in this area are entirely about protecting Assad's rear, not about the fight against ISIS.
(5) Turkey's strike is politically motivated indeed, but intended to deter Russia from attacking their ethnic kin.
(6) Conclusion, this attack had nothing to do with ISIS, one way or the other.
magari is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 07:25
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NNW of Antipodes
Age: 81
Posts: 1,330
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RYFQB
Hardly a NATO spokesperson, but I wouldn't think the Secretary General's home country put a dissenter on the screen either.
The point you made is genuine, and Turkey's response was "extreme" to the slight invasion of their [territorial] airspace which was very minor. The aircraft concerned transgressed by about 1.5NM but at no time could this be deemed as aggressive. The aircraft entered from the east and departed to the west in less than 30 seconds, i.e. a small miscalculation in the scale of things.

The Russian Federation would also be wise to accept that right and might are not necessarily the best of bed-fellows.
mm43 is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 07:27
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isis ?

Guys ,

Short and simple, no isis military groups are existing at that vicinity( north syria) , just el nusra (syrian turkish sunni group armed by usa and turkey ,offically known by nato against esad regime) and pyd ( kurd groups) are positioned there. Russia has been carried out air strikes to them last one month and violated Turkey's border dosen of time or more.. It is clear that Turkey as Nato member wont shoot down a Russian Fighter without States confirmation.

So for the ones who mention that Turks are trying make shield to protect Isis is ...

Try to be more sphecific...

Turkey is not over-reactive ; remember that syria shoot down Turkish fighter 2 years ago because of same reason. there is no squawk code of fighters to identify its russian or syrian, even doest not matter...
umitatl is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 07:48
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Home soon
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have heard on 121.5 at least two/three times in last few months ,flying into Istanbul ,military crew speaking in English asking for an aircraft to change its course or action will be taken.
My 2 cents.
de facto is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 07:49
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Q5
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
absolutely correct umitatl, a good response to Sunfish's whitewashing of NATO from its relation to ISIS/IS or wharever f#@$.

ISIS has emerged out of nowhere in February 2014 just because the battle for Syria got stuck/stalemated, in concert with Ukraine "crises" directed by Victoria Nuland. A "casus bellum" was required to continue the battle in a more covert manner hence ISIS's emergence to provide that cover.

This attack together with the metrojet's attack's beg's for a response from Russia. And so they will deliver this , see history.

A possible scenario I can think of is 1 response to Turkish airforce/ground troops and 1 to the participating ME airliners (including ISisrael).

Certainly very interesting times ahead. Poking a bear or even a cat for that matter is not a good idea. The reaction will be in direct proportion to the size of the animal.
Boeingrestricted is offline  
Old 25th Nov 2015, 08:02
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Norfolk
Age: 67
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Summary...

The Russians play Chess while the rest of the world are playing Checkers (Draughts).
G0ULI is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.