Wikiposts
Search
Biz Jets, Ag Flying, GA etc. The place for discussion of issues related to corporate, Ag and GA aviation. If you're a professional pilot and don't fly for the airlines then try here.

supersonic no more

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Nov 2015, 06:28
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flexjet orders 20 supersonic business jets from from Aerion

Beginnings of a new supersonic era?

REUTERS -- Nov 17 Flexjet said it ordered 20 of Aerion Corp's AS2 supersonic business jets, which will make the private jet travel firm the first to offer publically available supersonic transport since the Concorde was grounded in 2003.

AS2, a three-engine jet that can carry eight to 12 passengers, is being developed by Aerion in collaboration with Airbus Group. It is expected to make its maiden flight in 2021 and enter service in 2023.
Notably, if the Aerion AS2 flies at Mach 1.2 at or above FL350, its sonic boom will not reach the ground -- possibly allowing supersonic flights within the continental US and Europe, in addition to oceanic flights and regions with no supersonic restrictions (notably China).

Read more at Reuters
peekay4 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 07:57
  #2 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
if the Aerion AS2 flies at Mach 1.2 at or above FL350, its sonic boom will not reach the ground
Can someone with more theorical knowledge than I do explains this ?

I also fail to see the interest to fly at M1.2 compared to a Citation X at M.9 at 1/5 th of the price.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 08:18
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sonic booms and mach 1.2

A simple explanation of why the sonic boom does not reach the ground when at Mach 1.2 above FL350 is found here:
Quiet Supersonic - NASA Chases Fleeting Booms | Things With Wings

Cubemaster
cubemaster is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 08:34
  #4 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks cubemaster. very interesting , we'll see if those "evanescent waves" are acceptable or not to people on the ground , but the schema in the article raise another question : would the reflected wave be perceided by following aircraft flying behind/below ?
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 08:59
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
I also fail to see the interest to fly at M1.2 compared to a Citation X at M.9 at 1/5 th of the price.
It's supposed to cruise at M1.4-M1.5 over water. Still not quite Concorde, though.
PAX_Britannica is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 09:01
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 65
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cubemaster
A simple explanation of why the sonic boom does not reach the ground when at Mach 1.2 above FL350 is found here:
Quiet Supersonic - NASA Chases Fleeting Booms | Things With Wings
Maybe a Tech Log question, but is there a good (technical) reason why Concorde couldn't have done that ?
PAX_Britannica is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 10:24
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Montenegro
Age: 41
Posts: 339
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
"It's supposed to cruise at M1.4-M1.5 over water. Still not quite Concorde, though."

it would still spare an hour or two on transoceanic flights, in business world that might be worthwhile
AreOut is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 10:36
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smells like a PR stunt to me. Mach 1.2-1.5 has huge transonic drag and the massive additional fuel consumption will eat away you range, which is not worth the marginal overall speed increase. At least not for a significant number of aircraft to make the development costs break even.
procede is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 11:35
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Delta of Venus
Posts: 2,383
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I wondered when this old chestnut would come around again. Massive airships and personal jet packs will be back again sometime as well....
Private jet is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 12:49
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mach 1.2-1.5 has huge transonic drag and the massive additional fuel consumption will eat away you range, which is not worth the marginal overall speed increase.
Aerion AS2 will be the first production aircraft to employ a Supersonic Natural Laminar Flow wing, after apparently successful tests with NASA demonstrating an SNLF airfoil at high Reynold numbers suitable for a commercial jet.

A laminar flow wing significantly reduces drag, up to 90% reduction compared to current supersonic wings. The reduction in total drag (including other parts of the aircraft) is more modest -- predicted to be around 20% -- but that's enough to make supersonic flight economical.

Aerion's airfoil was able to simultaneously maintain laminar flow while shaping the sonic boom to enable quiet flight.
peekay4 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 13:56
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ATC Watcher
I also fail to see the interest to fly at M1.2 compared to a Citation X at M.9 at 1/5 th of the price.
If the 12 people that you are flying are paid in the order of $10,000 an hour or more, then the sums may well add up for the companies using seats on such a biz jet as a journey need not take a full working day out. Add continual Internet over SATCOM so work can be done during flight.

You can be sure that the beancounters will have worked out the comparative costs of travel by different means, including down time while traveling.
Ian W is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 14:19
  #12 (permalink)  
c52
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Surrey
Posts: 2,262
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What might be in the rear half (approximately) of the fuselage? - just something to hang the wings and engines on?
c52 is online now  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 14:34
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
With AS2 an executive might have morning meetings in New York, then head to London to sign a deal, then make it back to New York in time for dinner & daughter's piano recital that evening.

When you're a billionaire, why not?
peekay4 is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 15:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Escaped the sandpit 53° 32′ 9.19″ N, 9° 50′ 13.29″ E
Posts: 591
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know about a couple of people which are looking into a A340 Private Jet. O.K the aircraft is rather cheap, but the cost for conversion and the tco or think about what people are willing to paar for the Gulfstream G650
From my point of view the market is there.
ExDubai is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:27
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Home
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also, whilst there are a couple of jets that cruise at 0.9+, how many actually do it more than once after they see the fuel consumption?

The current "fast" jets are mostly top trump machines themselves.
Tourist is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 16:56
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Everett, WA
Age: 68
Posts: 4,408
Received 180 Likes on 88 Posts
There are a fair number of "cost is no object" people out there - Boeing has delivered over 200 Boeing Business Jets (including seven 777, nine 787, and eight 747-8) and the cost of the custom interiors is typically similar to the cost of the airframe.
It's long been speculated that the next supersonic passenger aircraft would be a business jet - this would seem to confirm that.
All that being said, I'll believe it when I see it. There are some major regulatory challenges (today's regulations are far removed from what Concorde was certified to), and the greenies will certainly have a hissy fit over the environmental impact and carbon footprint of a supersonic toy.

Last edited by tdracer; 18th Nov 2015 at 17:29.
tdracer is online now  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 17:26
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: New Braunfels, TX
Age: 70
Posts: 1,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Every time I see a picture of the Aerion AS2 I think "Douglas X-3 Stilletto". The Stilleto configuration (long skinny fuselage with high polar moments and really short wings) had severe inertial coupling problems at high speeds. Joe Walker barely survived an inertial coupling episode in the X-3. How is Aerion overcoming this problem which is inherent to that configuration?

As the Air and Space Smithonian website says:
Every research aircraft poses a question. Sometimes the answer is "forget it."

The X-3 Stiletto | Air & Space Magazine



Last edited by KenV; 18th Nov 2015 at 17:57.
KenV is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 18:01
  #18 (permalink)  
Resident insomniac
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N54 58 34 W02 01 21
Age: 79
Posts: 1,873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Then there was the Lockheed Starfighter.
G-CPTN is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 18:09
  #19 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In the shadow of R101
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
We've had unstable aircraft with computer-controlled control surfaces for over 40 years, the inherent inertia coupling tendencies will be controlled by that same philosophy.

The X-3 was designed in the late 40s/early 50s and hence couldn't benefit from small lightweight digital computers because they were not developed until 15 or more years later.

Just read the remainder of the X-3 Wikipedia article. Quite sobering. 260kt take-off speed and +/-7g roll-coupled pitch oscillations on the flight where Joe Walker nearly lost control.
Feathers McGraw is offline  
Old 18th Nov 2015, 18:51
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: LFMD
Posts: 749
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
The Aerion is real enough - a friend of mine, one of my instructors, is a senior engineer on the project. Lots of interesting stories... (not to be repeated here I'm afraid).
n5296s is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.