Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

BREAKING NEWS: airliner missing within Egyptian FIR

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

BREAKING NEWS: airliner missing within Egyptian FIR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:34
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: EC
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe there was nothing at all wrong with the aircraft? Recall the speculation immediately after the Germanwings incident?
babybaby is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:47
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if that data IS accurate (and I'm not suggesting that it is) -
The profile looks rather like a phugoid oscillation.......
Weary is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:47
  #123 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Hotel Sheets, Downtown Plunketville
Age: 76
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the photos, ADS-B and FR24 data posted on this forum are anything to go by, it looks very much that the aircraft suffered a catastrophic event in the cruise. Perhaps brought about from a major fuselage rupture from an internal or external force.
With the TWA 800 crash, initially there was a big flap that it had been shot out of the sky by a rogue missile. In the final outcome it was attributed to the center fuel tank.
Chronus is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:49
  #124 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So Egyptians start reading flight recorders themselves, doesn't even waiting for Russian investigation authorities to arrive...
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:51
  #125 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:57
  #126 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not seeing a great deal of evidence that the aircraft broke into 2 pieces. If, as reported, bodies are over a 3km area, that is more likely to have broken in flight
Wellfan is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 19:57
  #127 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: 41N
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to Russian "Kommersant" newspaper the official representative of TH&C holding- the parent company of the perished charter plane said that the plane underwent a D-Check procedure last year (according to the rep D-check takes place every 12 years of service and takes 30-40 days in a special tech facility with all the major components and systems tested and replaced if needed). In addition the certificate (of airworthiness?) has been confirmed this year...
Nik4Me is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:09
  #128 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remember what is pushed to the media may not be the truth.

Russian BUK missiles can reach around 70k feet (MH17).

Glide range depends on many factors, but I was taught a rule-of-thumb of 2 x the height in thousands....so, 31000 ft gives about 62 miles glide.

In unforeseen incidents such as this, the pilots' first reaction is, should be, FLY THE AIRCRAFT. Then navigate safely, and THEN communicate.....
777JRM is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:10
  #129 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Kerikeri New Zealand
Age: 89
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
from 31000 ft can only glide 15 miles

Surely you mean it can glide for 150 miles.

From the usual outer marker point of 10 miles most jets can glide all the way to the thresh hold provided they don't dirty it up with gear and flaps.
gulfairs is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:17
  #130 (permalink)  
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Lincolnshire
Age: 81
Posts: 16,777
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Gulfair, he was not making a statement but citing the authoritative statements from the instant experts.
Pontius Navigator is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:23
  #131 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the poster who stated that 'aircraft do not drop out of the cruise, with no calls etc. unless a catastrophic failure or something sinister' -

Actually, they sometimes do.

AF 447, Air Asia 8501, and Air Algerie (MD-83) are three recent examples.

The crew was far too busy "Aviating" (or trying to) -- to be bothered with step 3 "Communicate"

Unless a flight crew gets the plane back under control, there isn't much point sending a mayday call. There will be no one to rescue.

(Air professionals all know this, but others reading this thread today may not).
Passenger 389 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:28
  #132 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Here and there
Posts: 2,781
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Assuming the following-A321 with 210 pax approx zfm of 68t, five hour flight plus reserves requires 18t ramp fuel, 3t burn to get to the point it all kicks off.
The Buffer onset is about where they were when this started according to FR24 data. Winds aloft have been westerly for a number of days so TAS =GS.
tubby linton is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:39
  #133 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Originally Posted by mbriscoe
But the time on the data is that added when it was transmitted, not when it was received or sent by the server.
Then it's even less likely to be synchronised across different receivers. The basic ADS-B data that most of them supply to FR24 is timestamped by using the PC's clock. We all know how accurate those are.

How else do you account for the wild variations in speed and VS? For example between 04:13:00.0Z and 04:13:00.6Z the three sources reported the groundspeed variously as 404kts, 398kts and 347kts. That's a longitudinal deceleration of around 5g.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 20:52
  #134 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Solihull
Age: 78
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reroutes

Notice most flights are now avoiding this routing but on the other hand Middle East Aurlines are still routing out of Beirut and crossing Syria . Another tradegy waiting to happen ?
clivegore is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:12
  #135 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Ijatta
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 321 pilots I've spoken with say the plane, compared to the 319 and 320 is a real dog.

Wing area same as all 320 series Airbuses. 122.6 m².

Last edited by wanabee777; 31st Oct 2015 at 21:27.
wanabee777 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:16
  #136 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
The basic ADS-B data that most of them supply to FR24 is timestamped by using the PC's clock. We all know how accurate those are.
Most modern Internet-connected PCs should be synched via NTP; my laptop claims it's within 25ms of the half-dozen NTP servers it's listening to. But, yeah, the XP machine at work only seems to sync every few days, so it diverges quite a bit in that time.

I know ADS-C has a timestamp, but I think you're right that ADS-B doesn't. Since it's immediately broadcast, you know the time it was sent when you receive it... there's no delay from sending it through ACARS. My ADS-B receiver is down with a bad PSU at the moment, so I can't check how it's timestamping the messages.
MG23 is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:18
  #137 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This might answer some of the questions that have been raised concerning FR24 data:

We acquired a signal from the aircraft shortly after takeoff and tracked it until 04:13:22 UTC. At the time of last contact we were receiving a signal from the aircraft to three of our receivers, all of which stopped receiving data from the aircraft at the same time.
Source:
Crash of Metrojet Flight 7K9268 | Flightradar24 Blog
Engineless is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:20
  #138 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Major depress event? Emergency decent? Onboard bomb? Loss of control? Who knows. Find out soon enough with the boxes found. What's security like at Sharm?

Airport worker with ISIS sympathies?
VinRouge is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:20
  #139 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
One of our own pPruners giving a pretty balanced view on BBC news tonight.
funfly is offline  
Old 31st Oct 2015, 21:22
  #140 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know ADS-C has a timestamp, but I think you're right that ADS-B doesn't.
ADS-B does have a timestamp:

Column Information
A UTC Time Stamp
B FR24 internal unique flight ID
C Callsign KGL9268 = flight 7K9268
D Latitude
E Longitude
F Internal FR24 data type
H Squawk – Code ATC is using to identify flight
I Ground Speed in Knots
J Heading
K Vertical Speed in feet per minute
L Internal FR24 data identifier
M The ID of the FR24 receiver picking up data. (7K9268 was covered by multiple receivers)
N Internal FR24 data identifier
Source:
Crash of Metrojet Flight 7K9268 | Flightradar24 Blog
Engineless is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.