Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

MH17 Update

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Oct 2016, 09:49
  #121 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Eastern Europe
Age: 61
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Judging from video, the An-26 was shot down at altitude about 4400 m, not 6000 or more (perhaps claimed by crew). Also, its engine was hit, therefore IR homing. Buk has radar homing.
Lena.Kiev is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2016, 09:51
  #122 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: The World
Posts: 2,298
Received 356 Likes on 195 Posts
Originally Posted by MickG0105
Regarding the USS Vincennes, you left out the bit where they challenged Iran Air flight 655 ten times to identify itself before firing at it.
You left out the bit how most of those transmissions were on military-only UHF, and the other transmissions were vague and non specific. At least the crew of the ship had the capability to warn them. Who knows, there might have been circumstances where the missile launcher crew genuinely believed they were a threat? Maybe one the crew had failed to fire an a target before believing they were a civilian aircraft and it turned out it was a military aircraft? Human factors played a part in IR655 and they probably played a part in this one too. It may be that they never come to light though.

Last edited by dr dre; 6th Oct 2016 at 10:03.
dr dre is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2016, 10:19
  #123 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not 6000 or more (perhaps claimed by crew
The reports I read said it was at 6500 metres. It was a Russian media outlet (TV Zvezda) that said it was a BUK that did it. They said the rebels had captured a BUK from Ukrainian forces. A claim we now know is nonsense. The launcher was supplied from over the border as the photographic and phone footage evidence shows.

Still, even if it wasn't a BUK (which I think it was) it proved that the rebels had a game-changer on their hands.

This, I think, shows up the culpability of Kiev for not closing the obviously dangerous airspace and the airlines that chose to continue to fly over the war zone despite the changed circumstances.
angels is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.