Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airbus A320 crashed in Southern France

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airbus A320 crashed in Southern France

Old 17th Jul 2015, 21:28
  #3301 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Typical reaction of the doushbags in cologne... they use that incident to flex their muscles and extend the reach of legislation even further into our lives.

None of the proposed points would have prevented the murder Lubitz has committed.

This is the biggest joke of all:

- Pilot support systems should be implemented within airlines.
"should"....

I can already see the MOLs of the airline world taking care of a pilots support program - that will consist of an axe, no doubt about that.
His dudeness is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2015, 00:01
  #3302 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Santa Rosa, CA, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dr. Janus and the Rocking Chair

Airbubba: "The psych eval (remember the Drs. Janus and the rocking chair at Delta?)"
That was very entertaining!
PrivtPilotRadarTech is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2015, 00:58
  #3303 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
His dudeness:


I can already see the MOLs of the airline world taking care of a pilots support program - that will consist of an axe, no doubt about that.
Well...perhaps. But, in the EU, the US, Canada, and OZ, the unions will short circuit your concern.
aterpster is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 14:11
  #3304 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chissay en Touraine, France.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not-so-random drink and drugs testing would be welcome imho.
And this alleged mass-murder only serves to demonstrate that controls over flight crew are still not yet adequate to protect the innocent travelling public. Who have a right, when they compulsorally place their trust and lives into the hands of two or three unknown, and unseen individuals, to expect that those individuals are Fit to Fly. In every sense.
ChissayLuke is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 17:16
  #3305 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ChissayLuke:

And this alleged mass-murder only serves to demonstrate that controls over flight crew are still not yet adequate to protect the innocent travelling public. Who have a right, when they compulsorally place their trust and lives into the hands of two or three unknown, and unseen individuals, to expect that those individuals are Fit to Fly. In every sense.
It will never be 100%, anymore than trains, automobiles, and ships.
aterpster is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 17:27
  #3306 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chissay en Touraine, France.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't recall saying that it ever would be.
But it is a sound aspiration, and there is a burden of duty of care upon 'regulators', to ensure that it is as near as it can be.
It is my view that the travelling public has a right to expect such.
ChissayLuke is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 18:14
  #3307 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I perceive the bigger danger here is not that we miss existing psychological conditions that affect pilots. Instead, my opinion (FWIW) is that increasing the pressure on pilots, and the intrusion of monitoring into private lives will drive some pilots into conditions that were NOT existing.

I agree absolutely that there needs to be a wholesale improvement in pilot support systems, and that pilots should be able to seek appropriate support and/or treatment for mental health issues. Just the same way as it is currently possible for physical health issues.

I just can't see that moving further down the road of intrusive monitoring linked to career-guilotines is going to achieve the intended result of reducing what is already a VERY rare situation.
Kitiara is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 22:01
  #3308 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ChissyLuke:

I don't recall saying that it ever would be.
Well, perhaps I am misreading your previous statement:

...when they compulsorally place their trust and lives into the hands of two or three unknown, and unseen individuals, to expect that those individuals are Fit to Fly. In every sense. ...
aterpster is offline  
Old 19th Jul 2015, 22:51
  #3309 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nonsense

ChissayLuke

The number of times pilots lay the finger on safety related issues within the industry at the risk of loosing their livelihood is a reality.

It is the regulating authorities that look the other side.EASA has started a witch-hunt.

As a passenger do not expect that when you pay 600 Euro to travel to the other side of the world or 35 Euro to go from Paris to Rome that nobody in the system is getting exploited.

If you accept this as normal then you have to accept the consequences as well.

The solution is simple. A slowdown of growth in the aviation industry and a complete revision of pilot training. This implies to keep it out of the hands of commercial enterprises.

Last edited by Pitch Up Authority; 19th Jul 2015 at 22:53. Reason: rephrased for clarity
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 01:28
  #3310 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pitch up authority well said.
Funny how jo public wants the cheapest but wants 5 star service.
When airfares were "well" priced maintenance was exemplary pilots well trained & not of a psychotic nature. ( yes some exceptions) so if Jo public wants/expects someone " driving" he can trust he better be prepared to pay for it!
Oh as for the 2 man rule. Well that has made it easier for those that wish us harm to get in on the act so to speak.
IcePack is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 02:08
  #3311 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Europe
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another truth

The suicide rate amongst doctors and in particular; dentist, psychiatrists and anestesist is amongst the highest of any profession.

The annual death rate due to medical malpractice outnumbers by far the loss of lives due to a crash.

And the shooting of MH17 has more to do with the fact that the authorities did not do their job properly by either closing down the whole airspace or issue an overflight ban to their respective airlines.
Pitch Up Authority is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 05:22
  #3312 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chissay en Touraine, France.
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm glad to have provoked debate.
I stand by my oroginal comments.
And would respectfully point out that safety of the flying public has nothing to do with expecting 5 star service, or the price paid.
References to other suicides are irrelevant. They don't tender to murder many innocents.
If you really are real pilots, and really hold those views, perhaps you'd be kind enough to give full reference.
ChissayLuke is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 07:23
  #3313 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: where the money is
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My psychiatrist neighbor told me that the Germanwings F/O most likely was suffering from some sort of 'narcissistic disturbance' (= best translation I could think of from 'narzistische Störung').

Looking at descriptions about this diagnosis, I can think of a bunch of people who in my opinion might be suffering from this. These people are steering cars, holding scalpels in their hands or even managing big corporations.
jetopa is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 07:40
  #3314 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,075
Received 66 Likes on 40 Posts
He was classified as "unable to work" (not just "unfit to fly") by some of his doctors for the day of the crash but he ignored it and did not tell his employer. He took strong psycho drugs against his depressions, drugs that are only available by doctor's permit and might change your mind up to making you agressive against yourself or others.
Less Hair is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 07:52
  #3315 (permalink)  
TWT
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: troposphere
Posts: 831
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Even drugs like the smoking cessation drug Champix/Chantix are implicated with their suicidal thought effects on some users leading to actual suicide.
TWT is online now  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 07:58
  #3316 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 59
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Pitch Up Authority

What about non European airlines flying into Europe?

Is EASA going to do anything about them?
If I recall, easa did stop some carriers that did not meet its standards.
They were not authorized to fly and land in europe.
Philippines Airlines comes to mind.
DirtyProp is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 08:03
  #3317 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 59
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by ChissayLuke
I'm glad to have provoked debate.
I stand by my oroginal comments.
And would respectfully point out that safety of the flying public has nothing to do with expecting 5 star service, or the price paid.
If you believe safety comes cheap, either you're naive or misinformed.
DirtyProp is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 14:20
  #3318 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Passengers don't understanding airline safety at all unless they are in an allied field.

Some pilots fly terrible pairings, layover in lousy, noisy hotels and accumulate fatigue. Then, they head back to the airport marginally rested at best, and fly another lousy segment of the pairing.
aterpster is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 19:36
  #3319 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I perceive the bigger danger here is not that we miss existing psychological conditions that affect pilots. Instead, my opinion (FWIW) is that increasing the pressure on pilots, and the intrusion of monitoring into private lives will drive some pilots into conditions that were NOT existing.

I agree absolutely that there needs to be a wholesale improvement in pilot support systems, and that pilots should be able to seek appropriate support and/or treatment for mental health issues. Just the same way as it is currently possible for physical health issues.

I just can't see that moving further down the road of intrusive monitoring linked to career-guilotines is going to achieve the intended result of reducing what is already a VERY rare situation.
Kitiara is offline  
Old 20th Jul 2015, 22:46
  #3320 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toowoomba Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just more of the same

Everywhere bean counters are cutting costs and jeopardising quality to make an extra buck with exponential bonuses paid to execs with no accountability for consequences. When is $x million profit not enough to start taking risks.

Last edited by Nicolaus Silver; 20th Jul 2015 at 22:47. Reason: Grammar
Nicolaus Silver is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.