Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Drones threatening commercial a/c?

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Drones threatening commercial a/c?

Old 21st Dec 2018, 08:54
  #981 (permalink)  

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This individual has done what BALPA has been trying to do for some years without success, make the politicians and airports see sense.
Why are drones permitted within Class A airspace without specific clearance from ATC?
sky9 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 08:57
  #982 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NUTTER IN VECC
Age: 59
Posts: 31
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by scudpilot
I thought the definition of Terrorism involved causing disruption to infrastructure and financial issues.
This pretty much fits the bill IMHO.
There's no single, universally accepted definition of terrorism, but this is from a 2005 publication (Root Causes of Terrorism):
"terrorism is a set of methods of combat rather than an identifiable ideology or movement, and involves premeditated use of violence against (primarily) non-combatants in order to achieve a psychological effect of fear on others than the immediate targets.”
Hence, terrorism seeks to cause fear through violence or the threat of violence. These drones at LGW seem to have done exactly that, even if the whole story is yet to emerge.
Tom Bangla is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:01
  #983 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 559
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
Flatmate of mine whilst beating up the countryside very low and fast got a model aircraft with the intake of the hunter. The energy in a large heavy lump of aluminium at more than double the speed of an airliner on approach of take off is considerably more than an over the counter drone. It did go through the skin and take out his hydraulics but that was all. Thirty years on model aircraft are still flying everywhere and the frogs still manage to route their low level flights over my brothers club without bothering about his models flying above them. It’s politics wrt more big brother and taking our minds of the political crooks.
blind pew is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:02
  #984 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Saw this advert on the tube the other day.

Maybe a group like this were involved.

felixflyer is online now  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:26
  #985 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 1,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sky9, please explain how piling stricter rules on law-abiding UAS operators will combat attacks of this sort
ShotOne is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:31
  #986 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: uk
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sky9 -
Why are drones permitted within Class A airspace without specific clearance from ATC?
Silly old ATC, if only they'd refused the drone operators request for clearance this could all have been prevented.
vancouv is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:36
  #987 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by blind pew
Flatmate of mine whilst beating up the countryside very low and fast got a model aircraft with the intake of the hunter. The energy in a large heavy lump of aluminium at more than double the speed of an airliner on approach of take off is considerably more than an over the counter drone. It did go through the skin and take out his hydraulics but that was all. Thirty years on model aircraft are still flying everywhere and the frogs still manage to route their low level flights over my brothers club without bothering about his models flying above them. It’s politics wrt more big brother and taking our minds of the political crooks.
I don’t recall many RC aircraft of that era being a “large heavy lump of aluminium”, and whilst I take your point about relative speeds I don’t fancy finding out what a heavy, dense battery pack on a household drone will do to the Fan (and downstream components) on one of the current high bypass engines, especially when running at takeoff power.
wiggy is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 09:42
  #988 (permalink)  

Avoid imitations
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wandering the FIR and cyberspace often at highly unsociable times
Posts: 14,573
Received 412 Likes on 217 Posts
Originally Posted by wiggy
I don’t recall many RC aircraft of that era being a “large heavy lump of aluminium”,
The airframe wasn't, but a 10cc glow plug engine and a tuned pipe are far heavier than an anti-aircraft round.
ShyTorque is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:14
  #989 (permalink)  

Keeping Danny in Sandwiches
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: UK
Age: 76
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by vancouv
Sky9 -

Silly old ATC, if only they'd refused the drone operators request for clearance this could all have been prevented.
No but drones are technically aircraft and there is absolutely no reason why drones could not be given permission to operate at a specific time place and height within controlled airspace with the clearance could be given electronically. At the present time it would appear that they have been given unrestricted access up to within 1km of an airfield and a specific height in all airspace
The current operator if he gets caught will no doubt claim that he wasn't endangering an aircraft because there were all grounded and the jury will no doubt find him innocent or the judge will give him a suspended sentence.
sky9 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:16
  #990 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: hertfordshire
Age: 49
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wouldn't this whole incident be rather ironic if it turns out to be an old boy farmer trying 'to get with the times' with a industrial drone to crop spray his fields (I know there is a lot more requirements needed).
not having the experience or full know how but dangerous enough to think he knows and planning a route over his crops and sending the drone on it's way.
I can just imagine him (or her) sitting in his front room thinking 'this new fangled technology is great', completely unaware what is actually going on. none the wiser.

Last edited by diddy1234; 21st Dec 2018 at 10:44.
diddy1234 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:23
  #991 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: SW
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3 years ago police cuts removed 50 specialist officers from airport flightpath protection. Originally deployed to counter the perceived terrorist manpad threat, would have been useful to instead expand remit to counter the well-warned drone threat. All I could find was this Reuters article. There must be more in the public domain somewhere.
https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-britain-security-police-exclusive-idUKKBN0TN0Q320151204

"Known as Flight Path Protection Teams (FPPT), the British police units were set up in 2008 to find and negate the threat from locations near airports where militants could fire Manpads or similar weaponry at planes as they take off and land.

They also work with local communities to collect intelligence about any suspicious activity.

Police chiefs plan to reduce their number from about 50 officers around the country to two constables based in London because they have assessed that there is currently minimal risk of such attacks, the two sources told Reuters."
switch_on_lofty is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:30
  #992 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lichfield UK
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by olster
Hopeless and opiniated...seriously? Gatwick closes down and the politicians who are responsible are beyond criticism?
I think that you'll find that the person(s) responsible is / are someone skulking around Gatwick in possession of a drone.
RealFish is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:40
  #993 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
All reminds me of the Iceland volcano of 10 years ago, nobody is left in authority who is capable of taking decisions on what to do, all too frightened of being second-guessed by somebody afterwards so leave it to "someone else" along the chain.
WHBM is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:45
  #994 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: south wales
Age: 46
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RealFish
I think that you'll find that the person(s) responsible is / are someone skulking around Gatwick in possession of a drone.
I'd put money on that actual team (not one single individual) being in a van, heading up the M3 at this very moment, towards the M25 and Heathrow airport to repeat the same shenanigans again - probably on Christmas eve.
cjm_2010 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 10:53
  #995 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Uka Duka
Posts: 1,003
Received 37 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by cjm_2010
I'd put money on that actual team (not one single individual) being in a van, heading up the M3 at this very moment, towards the M25 and Heathrow airport to repeat the same shenanigans again - probably on Christmas eve.
Possibly. But my money's on it being a demonstration of ability.
The team who did it are many miles from the EGKK now and drinking some beers and finessing their road map of intended extortion.
"EGLL - you're next unless you transfer X amount of £'s in to offshore account No; 1234, etc, etc.
Auxtank is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 12:27
  #996 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Doncaster
Age: 50
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sky9
No but drones are technically aircraft and there is absolutely no reason why drones could not be given permission to operate at a specific time place and height within controlled airspace with the clearance could be given electronically. At the present time it would appear that they have been given unrestricted access up to within 1km of an airfield and a specific height in all airspace
The current operator if he gets caught will no doubt claim that he wasn't endangering an aircraft because there were all grounded and the jury will no doubt find him innocent or the judge will give him a suspended sentence.
In reality operators with a PfCO will be aware when flying in an area that is either controlled or closed to controlled airspace and will make contact with the appropriate tower. Typically they want to know where one is flying, the height and a contact number, and to get a call when flying is completed. If they have a greater concern about the proposed location if on the flightpath it is then discussed, and usually some sort of compromise worked out.

It is of course obvious that yesterday's dronist was not flying to anyone's rules.....
davidjpowell is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 13:39
  #997 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: US
Age: 66
Posts: 598
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Wycombe
Isn't jamming being used to stop drones going over prison walls? Not sure if that technology can be used in an airport environment, but if it can it should be.
jamming electronics at a airport. What could go wrong with that plan!
Sailvi767 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 14:08
  #998 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Age: 66
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DroneDog
Hopefully, the culprits will be caught, the cost to the airlines and the airports if horrific but if I were a passenger who has been affected I would seek redress via the small claims court against whoever is responsible. A few thousand claims for lost business or inconvenience will make others think twice.
We know who is responsible for closing the runways... The authorities for over reacting to the perceived danger... Looks like a small "phantom" type drone in the video, (it even had it's lights on to be seen) weighing less than 7Kgs and not even required to remain clear of controlled airspace.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
chopjock is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 14:45
  #999 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Winchester
Posts: 6,548
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by chopjock
We know who is responsible for closing the runways... The authorities for over reacting to the perceived danger... Looks like a small "phantom" type drone in the video, (it even had it's lights on to be seen) weighing less than 7Kgs and not even required to remain clear of controlled airspace.
Correct me if I'm wrong...
If you are going selectively pick at the U.K. regs then could I perhaps fill in a few details you’ve missed, such as the issue of flying within 1km of an airfield such as LGW ( Article 94B ) and also the important issue of Article 241, “A person must not recklessly or negligently cause or permit an aircraft to endanger any person or property”.....








wiggy is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2018, 14:45
  #1000 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Police are exploring "a number of lines of inquiry", including environmental activism and "high-end criminal behaviour".
Euphemism for they still haven't got a clue.
WHBM is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.