MH17 down near Donetsk
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ireland
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Detailed debris field analysis from the Wall Street Journal
Map of a Tragedy: How MH17 Came Apart Over Ukraine - WSJ.com
Map of a Tragedy: How MH17 Came Apart Over Ukraine - WSJ.com
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RetiredF4
I dont think so. The seeker head of the missile is semiactive homing, and it heads for the biggest radar return, which is not the engine.
My two pence on the "skid marks" on the wing: There are images of bare metal sporting a green "skid mark" on it. Metal that is not primered (leading edge of the wing, for example), so I doubt the marks are actually the primer.
I warrant that after the missile went bang, what was left of the none explosive parts hit the wing as they began the fall back to earth. With the forward motion of the aircraft, the wing probably travelled into their path. Either that, or it is damage from the explosive shrapnel.
Last edited by LiveryMan; 30th Jul 2014 at 09:23.
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sydney (Aust)
Age: 78
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
engine pod/cowling piece on WSJ
WSJ says this is from the engine because of the RR logo, so I double checked them. Hard to tell at the magnficiations, but certainly something there. To me it seems likely, as there was heavy shrapnel activity in front of that engine.
imgur: the simple image sharer
original
http://graphics.wsj.com/mh17-crash-m...l/IMG_0688.jpg
imgur: the simple image sharer
original
http://graphics.wsj.com/mh17-crash-m...l/IMG_0688.jpg
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KatSLF
Why would leading edge not be primed? if it's painted it needs undercoat, doesn't it?
Last edited by LiveryMan; 30th Jul 2014 at 10:32.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rolls Royce Logo
This side has photos of 9M-MRD.
9M-MRD Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6(ER) - cn 28411 / ln 84 - Planespotters.net Just Aviation
Chronologically ordered, most recent above.
It's definitely the Engine Logo! Port or starboard?
How that part separated and remained close to the front fuselage - while the engine remained attached to the wing - is hard to imagine.
9M-MRD Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777-2H6(ER) - cn 28411 / ln 84 - Planespotters.net Just Aviation
Chronologically ordered, most recent above.
It's definitely the Engine Logo! Port or starboard?
How that part separated and remained close to the front fuselage - while the engine remained attached to the wing - is hard to imagine.
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Scotland
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engines have let go on the 777 before, sometimes in spectacular fashion, and have never caused the cowl to separate from the engine. Though admittedly, none had been attached to a plane shot out of the sky at the time.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only frame on the nacelle is at the inlet side, forward of the fan housing (and attached to it by multiple bolts, which I can not see in the picture). The thrust reverser has two half-circular frames, but I would expect more systems parts installed to it, which are not present. Looking at the RR logo, I would assume this is a piece of the forward inlet frame. It is highly unlikely that engine debris would hit it, so I would assume shrapnel damage from the front side as most probable. On page 6 of this brochure you can see the according frame in the lower left picture.
Fits the other damage, if this is the port side engine nacelle frame.
Fits the other damage, if this is the port side engine nacelle frame.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Nova Scotia
Age: 55
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by KatSLF
However these pieces I thought might be engine/fan, Retired54 is thinking missile guidance fins??
edge-on view
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
top side
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
turned over, bottom view
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
However these pieces I thought might be engine/fan, Retired54 is thinking missile guidance fins??
edge-on view
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
top side
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
turned over, bottom view
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645908125941
Looks quite similar to the part in the photos above.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Age: 72
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
article
Article published today by former airline pilot Peter Haisenko
http://www.anderweltonline.com/wisse...alaysian-mh17/
http://www.anderweltonline.com/wisse...alaysian-mh17/
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Finland
Age: 57
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My two pence on the "skid marks" on the wing: There are images of bare metal sporting a green "skid mark" on it. Metal that is not primered (leading edge of the wing, for example), so I doubt the marks are actually the primer.
I warrant that after the missile went bang, what was left of the none explosive parts hit the wing as they began the fall back to earth. With the forward motion of the aircraft, the wing probably travelled into their path. Either that, or it is damage from the explosive shrapnel.
I warrant that after the missile went bang, what was left of the none explosive parts hit the wing as they began the fall back to earth. With the forward motion of the aircraft, the wing probably travelled into their path. Either that, or it is damage from the explosive shrapnel.
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: planet earth
Age: 72
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Sydney (Aust)
Age: 78
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The back of the roof/cargo bit
imgur: the simple image sharer
a full back image shows STA numbers, which is the spars or ribs that go all around the "tube". So the same number can be roof or cargo bay or either wall. STA number was used for identifying the location and WSJ themselves wavered about it in different editions. The colour being white, I vote for roof.
imgur: the simple image sharer
centre image is the rest of the roof over business class, folded over on the port wall. The open section is the door in front of the wing; the section broke clean at rivet line behind the first porthole.
bottom is Missile fin???
most images of BUKs show them very green, including fins, maybe a white tip. But I found some that have shorter side fins and larger tail fins, in BARE METAL, so those strange bits of metal are possibles.
imgur: the simple image sharer
a full back image shows STA numbers, which is the spars or ribs that go all around the "tube". So the same number can be roof or cargo bay or either wall. STA number was used for identifying the location and WSJ themselves wavered about it in different editions. The colour being white, I vote for roof.
imgur: the simple image sharer
centre image is the rest of the roof over business class, folded over on the port wall. The open section is the door in front of the wing; the section broke clean at rivet line behind the first porthole.
bottom is Missile fin???
most images of BUKs show them very green, including fins, maybe a white tip. But I found some that have shorter side fins and larger tail fins, in BARE METAL, so those strange bits of metal are possibles.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
parts of engine cowling?
Second picture? no. Should be composites, not metal. This is fuselage debris.
Third picture? probably a Railroad crossing...(or the wrong link)
I don't own this space under my name. I should have leased it while I still could
On further thought, the diagram presented by OleOle shows a port quarter missile path.
If that is the case, could that diagram show the missile came from Government held terrain? As it purports to show a passing shot it suggests that the aircraft was the missile engagement zone for about 4-5 minutes.
Such a long time in the MEZ would thus suggest sufficient time to determine that the target was a fast high flyer and probably not a legitimate target. OTOH it could have been considered a high altitude reconnaissance flight returning to the east.
Now I am not saying that this proves anything one way or the other and that the diagram could conceivably be disinformation.
If that is the case, could that diagram show the missile came from Government held terrain? As it purports to show a passing shot it suggests that the aircraft was the missile engagement zone for about 4-5 minutes.
Such a long time in the MEZ would thus suggest sufficient time to determine that the target was a fast high flyer and probably not a legitimate target. OTOH it could have been considered a high altitude reconnaissance flight returning to the east.
Now I am not saying that this proves anything one way or the other and that the diagram could conceivably be disinformation.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: uk
Posts: 857
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some pages back someone was looking for the photo of a green o-ring they thought might be part of the missile.
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645790319631
It was in the Tail debris field.
https://secure.flickr.com/photos/jer...57645790319631
It was in the Tail debris field.
This photographer has taken a huge number of excellent pictures of the crash site, but I can't help thinking I really want to buy him a ruler...
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: what U.S. calls Žold EuropeŽ
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
diameter would be 0.4m.
Of course a ruler would be a little more precise...