Ryanair wants compensation from NATS
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryanair wants compensation from NATS
Interesting as most of Ryanair's competitors would be on the receiving end of any claim it makes.
Ryanair demands Nats compensates for delays
Andrew Clark
Friday May 24, 2002
The Guardian
"Ryanair has written to the transport secretary, Stephen Byers, demanding compensation for air traffic control problems which have forced it to cancel dozens of flights.
The Irish airline has lost patience with national air traffic control services following a software problem on Friday which caused widespread disruption at airports.
Ryanair said the incident, the fifth glitch this year, caused it to cancel 51 of its 314 scheduled flights. It says 7,000 of its customers were unable to travel and a further 25,000 suffered delays of up to four hours.
It wants Mr Byers to force Nats to refund fares amounting to around £350,000. Ryanair is the first airline to break ranks by openly criticising Nats.
Friday's disruption was caused by an overnight software update which went wrong at Nats' new Swanwick control centre in Hampshire.
The marketing director, Tim Jeans, said: "This was a poor management decision and they lacked any backup. It was frankly incompetent to do it on a Thursday night, prior to the busiest day of the week."
Ryanair is the second largest carrier in passenger terms at Britain's airports, behind British Airways. Most UK airlines, including BA, BMI British Midland and EasyJet, are in a consortium which bought a 46% stake in Nats in a part-privatisation last year and so are reluctant to criticise Nats.
There was no comment from the Department for Transport last night. Nats referred inquiries to the government."
ES
Ryanair demands Nats compensates for delays
Andrew Clark
Friday May 24, 2002
The Guardian
"Ryanair has written to the transport secretary, Stephen Byers, demanding compensation for air traffic control problems which have forced it to cancel dozens of flights.
The Irish airline has lost patience with national air traffic control services following a software problem on Friday which caused widespread disruption at airports.
Ryanair said the incident, the fifth glitch this year, caused it to cancel 51 of its 314 scheduled flights. It says 7,000 of its customers were unable to travel and a further 25,000 suffered delays of up to four hours.
It wants Mr Byers to force Nats to refund fares amounting to around £350,000. Ryanair is the first airline to break ranks by openly criticising Nats.
Friday's disruption was caused by an overnight software update which went wrong at Nats' new Swanwick control centre in Hampshire.
The marketing director, Tim Jeans, said: "This was a poor management decision and they lacked any backup. It was frankly incompetent to do it on a Thursday night, prior to the busiest day of the week."
Ryanair is the second largest carrier in passenger terms at Britain's airports, behind British Airways. Most UK airlines, including BA, BMI British Midland and EasyJet, are in a consortium which bought a 46% stake in Nats in a part-privatisation last year and so are reluctant to criticise Nats.
There was no comment from the Department for Transport last night. Nats referred inquiries to the government."
ES
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: f015
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
and £150 to talk to them about it
But as our go captain said on the way back last friday
"We're still flying. Some of the others [ryanair] from stansted have been cancelling flights"
But as our go captain said on the way back last friday
"We're still flying. Some of the others [ryanair] from stansted have been cancelling flights"
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Manchester, England
Age: 58
Posts: 897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmmm (ref some recent Ryanair threads):
NATS causes Ryanair flight cancellations - Ryanair wants compensation (so they can compensate their affected passengers? - Thought not.).
Ryanair causes Ryanair flight cancellations, do the pax get compensation? Thought not.
Go figure......
NATS causes Ryanair flight cancellations - Ryanair wants compensation (so they can compensate their affected passengers? - Thought not.).
Ryanair causes Ryanair flight cancellations, do the pax get compensation? Thought not.
Go figure......
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Steady on lads, this NATS failure cost RyanAir and the other carriers big time, not to mention the untold misery to the travelling public. They have a right to be angry and to seek compensation.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bermuda Shorts and Cessna Caravans
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hold on; don't you normally get compensation when a product or service you've already paid for is unsatisfactory ?
Ryanair gets charged for NATS services after they have used them.
If Ryanair doesn't fly, it doesn't pay for the service.
Ergo, how can you claim compensation for something you haven't had ?!
I think, if the tables were turned, that's the kind of answer O'L would give
Ryanair gets charged for NATS services after they have used them.
If Ryanair doesn't fly, it doesn't pay for the service.
Ergo, how can you claim compensation for something you haven't had ?!
I think, if the tables were turned, that's the kind of answer O'L would give
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets face it guys...you are all upset because..."Ryanair is the wave of the future"...not the sordid past. Low cost services (Southwest style) are going to succeed in Europe (and the UK) because (what a novel idea)...thats what the punters want...simple as that.
And as for charging to apply...double up would be a better idea.
Sim check? Cash on the barrelhead...or NO job. More power to 'em !!
And as for charging to apply...double up would be a better idea.
Sim check? Cash on the barrelhead...or NO job. More power to 'em !!
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: here to eternity
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, 411A, yet again you are wrong, on several counts:-
- Ryanair's operation bears no similarity whatsoever to Southwest.
- Low-cost carriers are not "the wave of the future" either, except possibly on short-haul services. IT and long-haul are very different markets.
- Most people with whom I have talked hate everything that Ryanair stands for not because it is a low-cost carrier, but because it treats everyone - staff, passengers, suppliers - like dirt. The only thing that they want out of anyone is MONEY. I have nothing whatsoever against low-cost carriers. If Go/easyJet or Buzz were to offer me a job tomorrow, I'd snap their hands off in my enthusiasm.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In the meantime, they absolutely lap up the gravy.
Suspect that Ryanair's type of operation will change the face of European aviation permanently. And well it should....the very high cost of flying in Europe is a disgrace. They will never run out of pax because...most vote with their wallets.
Suspect that Ryanair's type of operation will change the face of European aviation permanently. And well it should....the very high cost of flying in Europe is a disgrace. They will never run out of pax because...most vote with their wallets.
411A - some of what you say is quite true. That is that the cost of flying in Europe has, until recently, indeed been absurdly high. Passengers will certainly 'vote with their wallets' - as I did when I stopped flying Lufthansa and switched to buzz. £80 more for a free drink and a Lufthansakaesebroetchen was just ridiculous! LH switched from A300-600 to smaller ac on the LHR-FRA route, hence there were fewer 'baragin seats' available - but STN-FRA with buzz was much cheaper, you buy a drink if you want one (except when they offload the bar....) and it's a very happy operation compared to the rather impersonal LH.
I've no experience of Easyjet or RyanAir - except for conversations with Easyjet's chief operations manager. Yes, they operate an efficient and popular service and have a loyal and mostly happy team - with a charismatic and genial boss. But that may not be true of other low-cost airlines........
Good luck to Easyjet,buzz, bmibaby, Go(ne) et al. - you've made air travel available to many thankful passengers.
I've no experience of Easyjet or RyanAir - except for conversations with Easyjet's chief operations manager. Yes, they operate an efficient and popular service and have a loyal and mostly happy team - with a charismatic and genial boss. But that may not be true of other low-cost airlines........
Good luck to Easyjet,buzz, bmibaby, Go(ne) et al. - you've made air travel available to many thankful passengers.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Nottingham, England
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets keep it real guys. Yes Ryanair don't sound like the best to work our butts off for (I have never worked for them so I am going by what i read) but they are here to stay for the forseeable future and much as they may be disliked by many they are keeping lots of us employed and getting lots of pax from A to B on valuable fares.
As for claiming compensation from NATS, technically yes they have paid for a product that they haven't received but the implications of a claim are far reaching. The major UK airlines that bought into NATS obviously would be foolish to make a claim. Yet their biggest rivals have every right to and probably will. This means that every carrier that had to cancel a flight operating to the UK on that Friday can claim against NATS (aka BA,bmi,Easyjet,Britannia etc etc...)
For whatever reasons (privatisation!!), NATS is in a mess and it's only the controllers that run it that make it work as well as it does. It needs to be sorted out once and for all!
ES
As for claiming compensation from NATS, technically yes they have paid for a product that they haven't received but the implications of a claim are far reaching. The major UK airlines that bought into NATS obviously would be foolish to make a claim. Yet their biggest rivals have every right to and probably will. This means that every carrier that had to cancel a flight operating to the UK on that Friday can claim against NATS (aka BA,bmi,Easyjet,Britannia etc etc...)
For whatever reasons (privatisation!!), NATS is in a mess and it's only the controllers that run it that make it work as well as it does. It needs to be sorted out once and for all!
ES
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: scandinavia
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ryanair is on it!
Finally someone has the balls to stand up and critizise a malfunctioning system.
If you buy hundreds of Boeings you want to see them in the air where they are generating profits.
Like one reply said " if you don't fly you don't pay for the Air Traffic service"!!
What a stupid response! It's like being served a bad meal at the restaurant and when complaining the response would be: You only pay for what you eat.....
Happiness is a black ECAM
If you buy hundreds of Boeings you want to see them in the air where they are generating profits.
Like one reply said " if you don't fly you don't pay for the Air Traffic service"!!
What a stupid response! It's like being served a bad meal at the restaurant and when complaining the response would be: You only pay for what you eat.....
Happiness is a black ECAM
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we are overburdening the system, always eating in to the outer edges of the safety envelope. If ATC is so busy that I cannot start my R/T with a "Goodmorning, sir", there must be something wrong. And that something wrong is the overstretching of a system that in essence should have big buffers at each end to avoid the worst...
Although they "may" make business sense, these high-density low-cost operations are eating away at the soul of what aviation should be.
So now, will ATC charge us if we get a readback wrong, or if we go-around after a botched up approach, or if we fail to take the first hi-speed turn on landing...? Probably the guys at Ryanair would just forward the invoice to the crew!
I think MOL and his like should leave aviation business to gentlemen (and ladies of course) and go make his $$$ somewhere else before he gives us all a bad name in a big way when the bubble finally bursts.
Written today, the 25 of May, 2002 A.D.
Although they "may" make business sense, these high-density low-cost operations are eating away at the soul of what aviation should be.
So now, will ATC charge us if we get a readback wrong, or if we go-around after a botched up approach, or if we fail to take the first hi-speed turn on landing...? Probably the guys at Ryanair would just forward the invoice to the crew!
I think MOL and his like should leave aviation business to gentlemen (and ladies of course) and go make his $$$ somewhere else before he gives us all a bad name in a big way when the bubble finally bursts.
Written today, the 25 of May, 2002 A.D.
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Bermuda Shorts and Cessna Caravans
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SAAB_SAFIR
The comment was made very tongue in cheek as the kind of response MOL might have issued had the roles been reversed and someone was claiming compensation from RYR for something..... Irony, geddit ?!
160
The comment was made very tongue in cheek as the kind of response MOL might have issued had the roles been reversed and someone was claiming compensation from RYR for something..... Irony, geddit ?!
160
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: SE UK
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Ryanair 123 enter the hold at FL240. Everyone else, you are cleared to self position left base R/W 23 call finals.
Ryanair 321, I say again, standby you have a slot delay call me back in 40 minutes due airfield congestion."
Ryanair 321, I say again, standby you have a slot delay call me back in 40 minutes due airfield congestion."
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Adrift upon the tides of fate
Posts: 1,840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think it is fantastic! About time some managers running Govt. services pretending they are 'businesses' got a taste of what the real business world is actually like.
Ryanair doing this will cost NATS money, will this not be a good incentive for NATS to get the problems sorted ? If it costs them nothing to have problems why would they spend money fixing them ?