Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Mar 2014, 11:40
  #6061 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Kowloon
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pont. Nav:

I was taught to do the same thing when I flew something small, pointy and fast.

However, on "modern" airliner-type transponders there is no need because one changes the squawk by pressing the Clear button, then simply pressing the four buttons corresponding to the given squawk.

I guess one could accidentally press 77 or 76 or 75, but that would be silly, given that one is sitting in a comfortable seat in shirtsleeves, not pulling "g" and fumbling with a gloved finger in a dark part of the cockpit.




edited to add: I agree with calypso.
China Flyer is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 11:46
  #6062 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: SV Marie Celeste
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What would you do as pilot of a 777 (or comparable aircraft) if faced with a 'significant' electrical fire in the exact position south of Vietnam where MH370 deviated from course?
Turn towards the nearest suitable runway, run the appropriate checklist. Just as he would have practiced many times in the simulator during his career. The company simulator, not his own.

I would keep well away from undocumented home made procedures. These are complex machines and you can run into pretty severe unintended consequences if in the spirit of the moment you go off piste. Avionics fire, fumes, smoke is a well covered scenario with well defined containment actions planned by boeing engineers and test pilots with far more in depth knowledge and time than I would have if suddenly confronted with the problem.

Last edited by calypso; 19th Mar 2014 at 11:56.
calypso is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 11:48
  #6063 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: ɐıןɐɹʇsn∀
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calypso
What would you do as pilot of a 777 (or comparable aircraft) if faced with a 'significant' electrical fire in the exact position south of Vietnam where MH370 deviated from course?
Turn towards the nearest suitable runway, run the appropriate checklist. Just as he would have practiced many times in the simulator during his career. The company simulator, not his own.
Said checklist including 7700 on the squawk and a MAYDAY call..
Hempy is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 11:53
  #6064 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turn towards the nearest suitable runway, run the appropriate checklist. Just as he would have practiced many times in the simulator during his career. The company simulator, not his own.
Indeed. Anyone looked into Langkawi airport as the runway he might have been heading to? To me this is the theory that makes sense..
Checklist also involves cutting electrical busses, refer to 1998 crash of Swissair DC-10 off Nova Scotia, where fire was the cause, and transponders and communications were shut off as they pulled the busses.
Climbing to FL450 also appears to me as an attempt to put out fire; hijackers climbing to FL450 do not make sense.
EngineeringPilot is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:00
  #6065 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Philippines
Posts: 360
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
12 Days in and still no commitment from any Transport Authority, Airline or Aircraft producer that Transponders be permanently locked in some way???

Will we learn nothing from this and 9/11 ???
OK here we go again on this issue. A transponder is an electronic component that as such can short out, cause phantom 76 (emergency) codes or in my case a phantom echo 100 feet above me. Without an off switch I would have had to land or vacate the control zone. Any electronic component needs a CB and/or off switch.
ChrisJ800 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:01
  #6066 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
Age: 85
Posts: 697
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the theories about emergency returns are negated by the fact that the FO made his 'laid back' RTT response after the transponder was disabled and, now we are told, after the left turn.
funfly is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:06
  #6067 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Clarty Waters, UK
Age: 58
Posts: 950
Received 60 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by EngineeringPilot
Anyone looked into Langkawi airport as the runway he might have been heading to?
You. Repeatedly........

Originally Posted by EngineeringPilot
Climbing to FL450 also appears to me as an attempt to put out fire
Someone who actually flies the 777 was quite clear, earlier today, that this is not how it's done.
Andy_S is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:07
  #6068 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: froggylandia
Age: 74
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turn towards the nearest suitable runway, run the appropriate checklist. Just as he w

Absolutely. 100%.
formationdriver is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:08
  #6069 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Last RT Call

The last RT call is not a proven fact. Many times call signs are confused and other aircraft reply. One of the most common phrases heard in the cockpit is,"Was that for us?"
atlast is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:09
  #6070 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: wales
Age: 81
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DaveReidUK
It's by no means certain that Inmarsat have access to any stored (ephemeral) data on any but the last ping.
I know it is in here somewhere that the CEO/some senior inmarsat bod said on the 1st day they announced it they had all the pings and had handed over the data, under the circumstances I doubt they have not got a copy of that data even if the satellite has now auto deleted it.

also these two posts

page 296 post 5915 volxanicash
For what it's worth, in Sunday's press conference the DCA Director specifically said that Inmarsat had provided data for six handshakes. He also said they had times and coordinates - although he obviously didn't actually mean "coordinates".
page 248 #4952 volcanic ash

In today’s (Sunday) press conference, the DCA Director also referred to calculations of the aircraft’s minimum and maximum speeds from last point of contact as considerations in determining the arcs.

You could google search for the DCA conference
oldoberon is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:14
  #6071 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by G-ARVH
We are talking about a deflated tyre that caught fire on take-off. It’s slow burning and smouldering, this has happened elsewhere in the world before in Nigeria I think leading to the loss of the aircraft. However by the top of the climb everything appears normal with the wheel in its well until they get a EIDAS warning.
And how does the slow burning tire explain the extra fix put into the active route of the FMC?
The EIDAS warning and the tire pressure warning would also appear on ACARS the tire pressure warning as the aircraft taxied.

I may have missed that but I don't think the extra warnings on ACARS have been reported in any of the briefings.
Ian W is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:14
  #6072 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Idlewild Peake
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
transponder to standby

Quote
"Interesting.
We were taught to go to standby, set the new squawk, and return to ON,
The logic was to avoid the possibility of going through an emergency squawk (unlikely) or flicking through other squawks."

The Australian AIP requires the use of standby when changing codes and explains why.

Last edited by uncle8; 19th Mar 2014 at 12:41.
uncle8 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:19
  #6073 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
On our A330 and 777's it never goes into STBY, stays in AUTO.

In fact in a lot of Airports if it's not working on the ground they call you up and ask you to turn it on so their ground movement radar can see you.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:20
  #6074 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: high in the sky....
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Squawk code change

Now with a numerical key pad their is no need to put transponder to standby... just key in the assigned code... Easy
aviator1970 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:21
  #6075 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by wild goose
Persistent reports in the media as well as posters here refer to a descent to 5000' to "avoid radar".
1) at 5000 ft you are still very visible to radar
2) with no Transponder (and no primary returns) how do they know the a/c was at 5000 ft?
3) if the aircraft was tracked doing this over "two or three countries" then what countries were they? What was the flight path?

Sorry, doesn't make sense.

Also, journalists, why aren't you asking about the pings?
The last ping was on the 40 deg arc. On what arcs were the other pings?

The Malaysians are just not being forthcoming about everything they know, they are worthy of hearty condemnation on this.
If you are behind a hill you may disappear and experienced controllers and military used to their radars will be able to say how low the aircraft would need to go to 'hide' behind the hills. Solid track suddenly disappears into radar shadow - you know you can see things to just over 5000' but less than that they disappear - assumption it was at 5000' or below. Controllers also have to know the bottom of their radar cover due to range - so a track disappearing as it flies away can give a good indication that it flew out of the bottom of the radar lobe. It is a simple task to calculate the bottom of the lobe at that range. Talk to another radar unit in another country and they had solid returns where it disappeared for you, QED
The flight path has been reported into the Malacca straights that is why the search suddenly switched there when the military confirmed their primary tracking. Thailand has also now belatedly confirmed the same track.

It does add up.

Last edited by Ian W; 19th Mar 2014 at 12:23. Reason: add radar lobe coverage at range
Ian W is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:21
  #6076 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: YSSY
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Gamebeater

Gamebeater wrote
The rate of BS per minute here is approaching the MACH Numbers.
Today's prize must go to the 'rotting mangosteen' theory
LegallyBlonde is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:23
  #6077 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: australia
Age: 81
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
@Ian W
And how does the slow burning tire explain the extra fix put into the active route of the FMC?
In the press conferance they stated there was no extra waypoint in the message. All there was was the original course to Beijing.
harrryw is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:24
  #6078 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Warsaw
Age: 46
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I stopped following this thread so closely as I used to because all the theories and speculations were killing me, but I need to ask one question now. I keep seeing posts about initial climb to FL450 here and there, and wondering how possible this is, since someone actually flying T7s mentioned few thousands posts ago that such climb would not be possible given the amount of fuel the a/c have had. forgive me in case that's already a closed topic...
barti01 is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:24
  #6079 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: london
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All the theories about emergency returns are negated by the fact that the FO made his 'laid back' RTT response after the transponder was disabled and, now we are told, after the left turn.
Can we verify this, if this is the case then that's quite significant.
captains_log is offline  
Old 19th Mar 2014, 12:26
  #6080 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,
Just a very short question from (evidently!) a non pilot (sorry if stupid or recently asked):
what do the a/c if the AP is on and nobody do anything when the last WP is reached?
Shadoko is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.