Malaysian Airlines MH370 contact lost
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: wherever
Age: 55
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Quote:
Oh hang on, outside of the cockpit (when he is always accompanied) where else can a "Fully qualified" pilot route plan, check fuel consumption, practice disabling equipment?
You DO know how many hours this captain has/d, don't you?
Oh hang on, outside of the cockpit (when he is always accompanied) where else can a "Fully qualified" pilot route plan, check fuel consumption, practice disabling equipment?
You DO know how many hours this captain has/d, don't you?
The point is, the police must investigate every possibility in order to dismiss each. Searching a house is one of the easiest tasks in this investigation requiring very few assets and very little time. Until it's done nobody knows what evidence may or may not be there!
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: R4808E
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Malaysian authorities seemed to dismiss the finding of Jet fuel in an oil slick in the South China Sea as being significant, if not connected to 370, where could the Jet fuel have come from?
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If reports about the likely (destination according to radar plots) is to be believed, and subsequently proved as being the Andaman Islands and we accept that someone set up a very deliberate flight path using recognised way points.
Why didn't 'they' set a direct course across the Thai peninsula.
That would have saved time and fuel.
Thoughts on why 'they' decided to fly over Malaysia first and then changed the heading?
Obviously this was not spur of the moment stuff.
Why that route?
Why didn't 'they' set a direct course across the Thai peninsula.
That would have saved time and fuel.
Thoughts on why 'they' decided to fly over Malaysia first and then changed the heading?
Obviously this was not spur of the moment stuff.
Why that route?
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Reported by Singapore Today on Twitter
"This is latest and most accurate flight path and the reason why the search is now where it is"
https://twitter.com/sgify
"This is latest and most accurate flight path and the reason why the search is now where it is"
https://twitter.com/sgify
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But why in the world someone who takes (unlawfully, let's suppose) control of the a/c would want to follow a route neatly through all those wpts? If he wanted to take it somewhere, it would be more logical to fly direct.
I'm not saying that's what happened but it is certainly something to consider.
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Malaysian authorities seemed to dismiss the finding of Jet fuel in an oil slick in the South China Sea as being significant, if not connected to 370, where could the Jet fuel have come from?
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South of the North Pole
Age: 67
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Please, could someone here with access to reliable knowledge confirm to me that push-back and take-off were precisely at 00:27 and 00:41 local time, respectively? I have various media contradictions (Flightstats vs. FR24 vs. others) and not interested in what the press says. Only in hard data. Many thanks indeed. Titania
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"This is latest and most accurate flight path and the reason why the search is now where it is"
EPPO: But why in the world someone who takes (unlawfully, let's suppose) control of the a/c would want to follow a route neatly through all those wpts? If he wanted to take it somewhere, it would be more logical to fly direct.
As soon as you go off-route and start flying direct, then that would be an unusual occurrence that you'd pay more attention to.
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: melbourne
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Let's back track.
Transponder turned off.
ATC ask aircraft flying ahead to try to make contact on the emergency frequency.
This was achieved. But I have seen no transcript even from memory of what was said. Just that communication was difficult because of static.
But the other Malaysian pilot said he was confident it sounded like the voice of the pilot or co pilot.
Then this avenue of communication stopped as well.
It would be very interesting to know the time line of the erratic flight levels.
Could that call up on the emergency frequency have alerted the innocent pilot to what the other was up to eg switching off the transponder. And a struggle eschewed???
It seems that some sort of conversation happened. If everything was kosher and you were in control of an aircraft and you are contacted on an emergency frequency saying that your transponder is off and ATC have lost you - that would be be more than a casual chat.
And finally what indication if any would appear on the flight deck that the transponder had been turned off. Would there be on screen messages? Alarms.
Specifically would a co-pilot know if a driver in the other seat had disabled these?
Transponder turned off.
ATC ask aircraft flying ahead to try to make contact on the emergency frequency.
This was achieved. But I have seen no transcript even from memory of what was said. Just that communication was difficult because of static.
But the other Malaysian pilot said he was confident it sounded like the voice of the pilot or co pilot.
Then this avenue of communication stopped as well.
It would be very interesting to know the time line of the erratic flight levels.
Could that call up on the emergency frequency have alerted the innocent pilot to what the other was up to eg switching off the transponder. And a struggle eschewed???
It seems that some sort of conversation happened. If everything was kosher and you were in control of an aircraft and you are contacted on an emergency frequency saying that your transponder is off and ATC have lost you - that would be be more than a casual chat.
And finally what indication if any would appear on the flight deck that the transponder had been turned off. Would there be on screen messages? Alarms.
Specifically would a co-pilot know if a driver in the other seat had disabled these?
Is the conflicting information coming from the various agencies (Malaysia, USA - even China) quite deliberate?
If we suppose the aircraft has possibly landed somewhere it would make sense for the authorities to keep giving an appearance of confusion and lack of knowledge whilst getting all the ducks in a row to deal with the perpetrators when they make their next move.
If we suppose the aircraft has possibly landed somewhere it would make sense for the authorities to keep giving an appearance of confusion and lack of knowledge whilst getting all the ducks in a row to deal with the perpetrators when they make their next move.
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Earth
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not too familiar with TCAS' operation, but since 370's Transponder was decidedly off, would 68 know they were there at all?
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: cornwall
Age: 78
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
playing for max confusion and time.....
The more one sees , and the more one reads, especially regarding the route being flown and the timing of dropping off of all comms, the more this looks like a very carefully planned and executed operation. The choice of when to go "missing" and then large changes of heading to throw off any searchers ( radar or otherwise ) .....
Looks like an insider job now from where I'm sitting , but sadly I've been wrong many times in the past, so.....
Looks like an insider job now from where I'm sitting , but sadly I've been wrong many times in the past, so.....
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
sneaking up on SIA
To 'sneak up' on SIA they would have had to be able to fly significantly faster than SIA or fly some sort of lateral intercept maneuver. SIA was also a T7.... I think we're in fighter/interceptor territory here, not what a T7 is built to do.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hoppy
How many of those hours are relevant to the skills required in this case?
A senior captain with that much experience and presumably access to a whole library of company and Boeng manuals is not likely to need a homebuilt flight sim to find out how to switch off, or disable various functions.
Yes, the police should investigate everything, but with limited resources they need to prioritise the most likely areas first.
A flight sim in the captain's home and discussed on a number of enthusiast forums and YouTube is not really that suspicious.
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Unna, Germany
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just my tuppence worth. The latest reports seem to indicate a plane flying along airways and my first thought was - bearing in mind their transponder was off and they weren't talking to anyone - thank goodness they didn't collide with another plane.
Some have suggested that an explosive decompression or even a slow decompression for that matter could have been the cause, losing communications - but surely anything disrupting the comms / transponder would also impact their ability to navigate?
Others suggest that some event - explosive decompression with failed oxygen would lead to hypoxia and this could have impaired their ability but how could they be so hypoxic as not to be able to enter the correct altitude in the autopilot but able to enter the details into a flight management system for a totally different set of co-ordinates?
Some are stating the pilot turned the transponder off as a precursor in a bid to commit suicide but then I recall hearing about the altitude change - if I pilot wanted to commit suicide, why not "go out in a blaze of glory" and charge along an airway toward oncoming traffic with ATC unaware what's going on? Surely, anyone intent on committing suicide isn't "rational" enough to switch from FL350 down to a level which would avoid any other traffic flying according to the Hemispherical rule.
Then why FL295? Because they were possibly transiting an area where the Quadrangal rule is in effect and they wanted to be sure that they didn't hit anything coming the other way, because this is in effect up to FL290 (see the Malaysian AIP). So why not fly at FL355? Possible because other planes flying at FL340 - 360 could see them pass relatively close under them and advise ATC of a "near miss"?
So when you add this all up together, I'm tending to think that this was a deliberate change of course, maybe a member of the crew had ulterior motives and had intended to divert elsewhere, for reasons unknown - who knows, maybe coercion of some sort or other? However he could only do this once his fellow (non involved) flight crew had actually left the cabin, for example for a toilet break, but what happened if he had miscalculated the fuel required to reach this new destination due to high level winds, due to the fact that he couldn't start his new flight because his co-crew didn't go for their break early enough, that the plane then was forced to ditch elsewhere?
I don't subscribe to the theory of someone else hijacking the plane by overpowering the crew because by now the backgrounds of all those on board would have been examined and anyone without a pilot's licence who would have been learning to operate a 737's navigational and comms system would be suspicious and I don't believe that an amateur, reliant on flight sims alone, would be able to adequately program a 737's FMS...
Some have suggested that an explosive decompression or even a slow decompression for that matter could have been the cause, losing communications - but surely anything disrupting the comms / transponder would also impact their ability to navigate?
Others suggest that some event - explosive decompression with failed oxygen would lead to hypoxia and this could have impaired their ability but how could they be so hypoxic as not to be able to enter the correct altitude in the autopilot but able to enter the details into a flight management system for a totally different set of co-ordinates?
Some are stating the pilot turned the transponder off as a precursor in a bid to commit suicide but then I recall hearing about the altitude change - if I pilot wanted to commit suicide, why not "go out in a blaze of glory" and charge along an airway toward oncoming traffic with ATC unaware what's going on? Surely, anyone intent on committing suicide isn't "rational" enough to switch from FL350 down to a level which would avoid any other traffic flying according to the Hemispherical rule.
Then why FL295? Because they were possibly transiting an area where the Quadrangal rule is in effect and they wanted to be sure that they didn't hit anything coming the other way, because this is in effect up to FL290 (see the Malaysian AIP). So why not fly at FL355? Possible because other planes flying at FL340 - 360 could see them pass relatively close under them and advise ATC of a "near miss"?
So when you add this all up together, I'm tending to think that this was a deliberate change of course, maybe a member of the crew had ulterior motives and had intended to divert elsewhere, for reasons unknown - who knows, maybe coercion of some sort or other? However he could only do this once his fellow (non involved) flight crew had actually left the cabin, for example for a toilet break, but what happened if he had miscalculated the fuel required to reach this new destination due to high level winds, due to the fact that he couldn't start his new flight because his co-crew didn't go for their break early enough, that the plane then was forced to ditch elsewhere?
I don't subscribe to the theory of someone else hijacking the plane by overpowering the crew because by now the backgrounds of all those on board would have been examined and anyone without a pilot's licence who would have been learning to operate a 737's navigational and comms system would be suspicious and I don't believe that an amateur, reliant on flight sims alone, would be able to adequately program a 737's FMS...
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Belgium
Age: 42
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In post 3233 The flightpath suggests transponder was disabled exactly at igari waypoint. If this is correct you could think the flightplan was already in the FMS beforehand and whoever was in control wanted tot hide the deviation from the filed flightplan exactly when reaching igari by turning off the transponder.
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Florida and wherever my laptop is
Posts: 1,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If reports about the likely (destination according to radar plots) is to be believed, and subsequently proved as being the Andaman Islands and we accept that someone set up a very deliberate flight path using recognised way points.
Why didn't 'they' set a direct course across the Thai peninsula.
That would have saved time and fuel.
Thoughts on why 'they' decided to fly over Malaysia first and then changed the heading?
Obviously this was not spur of the moment stuff.
Why that route?
Why didn't 'they' set a direct course across the Thai peninsula.
That would have saved time and fuel.
Thoughts on why 'they' decided to fly over Malaysia first and then changed the heading?
Obviously this was not spur of the moment stuff.
Why that route?
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: United Kingdom
Age: 39
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You wouldn't go out in a blaze of glory because if it were apparent that it was a deliberate act, your insurance will not pay out, not to mention the shame your family would live with. Whereas going into stealth mode, flying South West into very deep sea miles from where people are looking means there's a good chance you'll never be found.