Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

1.3 tonne of Cocaine found onboard an Air France aircraft in Paris...

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

1.3 tonne of Cocaine found onboard an Air France aircraft in Paris...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 20:41
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: MA, USA
Age: 54
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think hold baggage is all weighed? Did they have fake baggage tags like they went across the scale to make sure they overcharge you for your bag?
Yancey Slide is online now  
Old 23rd Sep 2013, 21:07
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would this extra 1.3 tonnes have been notified to the flight deck?

In a 100+ tonne aircraft it would hardly register IMHO. 1.3% or less of AUW?

Read "Trail of the Octopus" and think back to Lockerbie and ponder the implications, if you can sleep afterwards?
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 00:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Paris
Age: 74
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yeah, sure, the drugs trade is the only multibillion import business which doesn't use air transport -

guys, don't mock the hand that feeds you
edmundronald is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 00:43
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1998
Location: Mesopotamos
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As has already been alluded to 1.3t is not a quantity often used on first attempts.

Looks like the Venezuelan economy has taken a small hit in its GDP.

The question is who in Paris would have showed up at the baggage claim? We will never know.
cattletruck is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 03:51
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,558
Received 38 Likes on 17 Posts
Baggage handlers in South America will look the other way if it keeps their families safe

But I do think the shippers have been overindulging in their own product if they thought that shipping a tonne+ at a time was going to work. Now maybe it's a diversion from a 50 tonne shipment in a mother ship docking????

Last edited by RatherBeFlying; 24th Sep 2013 at 03:52.
RatherBeFlying is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 06:51
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,929
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not only the inbound cargo....

....outbound also seems to have its share of issues: just read that 50kgs of gold were stolen from an a/c at CDG.
172driver is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 07:00
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: On the chopping board.
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
And what the hell were they thinking doing this on the 11th of September?
My guess is that it isn't the first time, and being 9/11 (with extra security checks if they were actually in force) the people involved were finally caught out.

Who ever said there's no money in freight?
Ngineer is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 07:30
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Obviously the smugglers used no imaginative ways to disguise or conceal the drugs. If they did they'd have probably been caught.
Sober Lark is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 09:03
  #29 (permalink)  

FX Guru
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Greenwich
Age: 67
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, three Venezuelan National Guardsmen have been arrested. That is, on ther surface of it, an adequate enough explanation for how the drugs got on board.

If you're a handler in a place like Caracas, a Guardsman telling you to wander off for a fag break, "Oh, and how are the wife and kids?....," is an offer you can't refuse.

According to the wires, thrree Italians and three Brits have been arrested in Paris. This is the biggest ever seizure of Charlie in France so I find it hard to believe no French nationals were involved!
angels is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 12:04
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My guess is that it isn't the first time
I think your guess is right and this is just the tip of one very large iceberg, with that amount of money involved. The only way you'll stop it is to stop it being used. Go and tell that to the weekend parties in London - and the rest.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 16:01
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: England
Age: 78
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
overweight bags

A net haul of 1300kgs in 31 bags! For each case, that makes about 42kg of coke and say + 3kg for the case, a whopping 45kg per suitcase.
As the max allowed by AF is 32kg per bag, surely someone should have thought this ‘odd’ for 30+ bags to be so much OTT.
Incidentally 1.3 tons payload is nothing to an A330.
bedsted is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 17:34
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Paris
Age: 74
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking Lost luggage allowance :)

Internet research -I'm so naive - tells me that 130mg would be a very good dose, so 1.3T is about 10 Million doses, so we can assume that there must be a couple of hundred of these shipments made to France every year.

From which this seizure becomes a loss rate of less than 1/2 %; add a few more and you will be at the normal loss-rate for checked airline bags

On the other hand, the value of the shipment is sort of in the same ballpark as the value of the ship.

Last edited by edmundronald; 24th Sep 2013 at 17:39.
edmundronald is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 19:03
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over 30 suitcases registered with names of people not on the aircraft. Shocking lapse in security.
Surely that would be over 65 cases if it really was 1.3 tonnes seized?
Speed of Sound is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 21:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toowoomba Australia
Age: 76
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Les Cargos nails the green light

Have always felt these passenger mules were decoys and some shopped to let everyone feel authorities are on top of illicit traffic. Big operators want big action, not 10 analised ounces carried by desperados.

Would also suspect container loads would also have been used and "rostered" personnel see the stuff go through.

But after Vietnam would also take a close look at military air movements as they can fly in at night, distribute and with only "rostered" personnel on duty.

After gorging some AF lemon sorbets I wonder if 2 similiar aircraft, possibly belonging to military, one departing from say Asia and the other domestic, can fly across each others flight path and "alter" their identity so the incoming flight from Asia stacked with goodies can become the domestic flight to land at an isolate military airfield and not get any attention.

Last edited by Nicolaus Silver; 24th Sep 2013 at 21:58.
Nicolaus Silver is offline  
Old 24th Sep 2013, 23:29
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: France
Age: 85
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incidentally 1.3 tons payload is nothing to an A330.
Could it be that the A330 is the only aircraft type in the world that is not subject to MTOW llimits ? Also what about the center of gravity ? i.e: 1,300 kg loaded in the tail end would have no effect on the CoG ?
I am pretty sure the 1,300 kg were not taken into account in the load/trim sheets !!!
FlamantRose is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 00:05
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Except it was taken into account as bags registered to persons not on the flight.

Last edited by Burnie5204; 25th Sep 2013 at 00:06.
Burnie5204 is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 02:43
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Paris
Age: 74
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Any "corporation" that loads 100 Million dollars (resale) of stuff on a plane will certainly desire the plane to arrive intact ...

The drug wholesale shippers seem to be on the side of the angels

Last edited by edmundronald; 25th Sep 2013 at 02:43.
edmundronald is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 05:28
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Róisín Dubh
Posts: 1,389
Received 11 Likes on 4 Posts
Sos, France24 reported it was "just over 30 suitcases", may not be correct

Edmund, I know what you mean but frankly I find it terrifying that a large number of bags not belonging to passengers made it onto a French aircraft on the anniversary of the worst terrorist atrocity in living memory when the same group behind that vile act are kown to be targeting French assets
Una Due Tfc is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 05:55
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 45
Posts: 625
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thousands of bags are loaded every day without the owners being onboard. This is caused by the airlines, handling agents and airports failing in securing the bag is connected along with the passenger, getting left behind and forwarded on the next flight as unaccompanied baggage. Nothing unusual about that at all, and I suspect that is also the case here - or at least that was the way the bags were declared.
SMT Member is offline  
Old 25th Sep 2013, 08:04
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Posting #s 36, 38, 39.

Amazing how the lessons of Lockerbie, and the rules on unaccompanied baggage have been forgotten, 25 years after that major tragedy.

Do we assume these bags were specially screened?

With what they contained I doubt any competent hold baggage screener would pass them as the contents should show up as expensive icing sugar, so are the baggage security staff in on the deal?

PanAm 103 showed the way the villains could get a target using controlled drug runs (ignore all the official about Megrahi and Malta!) and it looks like we're looking at another actual weak link.
BARKINGMAD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.