Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

"2010 JFK A380 go-around incident highlights need for change"

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

"2010 JFK A380 go-around incident highlights need for change"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 30th Aug 2013, 17:30
  #41 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
(except the A380)
- and certainly gave it their best shot this time in JFK.............
BOAC is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 21:35
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: The No Transgression Zone
Posts: 2,483
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I don't know what's been going on at AF and whether it due to training or management.
Pugilistic Animus is offline  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 21:56
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: My views - Not my employer!
Posts: 1,031
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Is this what the BEA were after?

I've heard mutterings its certified and in use...
Cough is online now  
Old 30th Aug 2013, 23:47
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Permanently lost
Posts: 1,785
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I still don't know the reason for 1000 ft initially?
A suggestion only as I have never flown there but if continued to higher it may conflict with traffic inbound to either Newark or La Guardia.
PLovett is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 00:16
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: my house
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PARFU?

Radio? Surely you don't mean check in with atc before raising the gear?
McNulty is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 02:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,556
Received 74 Likes on 43 Posts
I've heard mutterings its certified and in use...
Arr, the rocket scientists at Toulouse have accepted the reality of Go Arounds... Better late than never.

While the OP has picked on AF for stuffing up, the report that prompted the thread is a very good read and very educational. Well done to the BEA.
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 07:13
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: IRS NAV ONLY
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote from Avherald:

At 1600 feet, still at 210 KIAS, the first officer ordered the flaps to position 3, the flaps relief kept the flaps at position 2. At 480 feet AGL the speed was still 210 KIAS and above glidepath about 1nm before the threshold, when the captain, pilot monitoring, ordered a go-around surprising the first officer.
Does AF/Airbus SOP not call for speed check before extending the flaps or is everyone just blindly relying on protections? I too would be really surprised in this situation - probably doing VREF+50 and flaps still in mid-range. Surely one could get stabilized before flare?
FlyingStone is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 07:46
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CFE
Age: 65
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Pugilistic Animus
I don't know what's been going on at AF and whether it due to training or management.
We all know that AF pilots are the worse.

This crew may have botched their approach but, besides the co-pilot bruised ego, managed to land their A380 safely after a GA.

The Turkish B737 crew in Amsterdam did not,
The Asiana B777 crew in San Francisco did not,
The UPS A300 crew in Birmingham did not,
The SW B737 crew in la Guardia did not,
...

Last edited by valvanuz; 31st Aug 2013 at 10:43.
valvanuz is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 07:50
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
McNulty : It was many generations ago (Viscount) but I seem to remember the "R" was for Radio Master Switch. Part of the Autoflight & Smith's Flight system (blimey, when dinosaurs roamed the planet Earth).
Landflap is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 16:15
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Surrounded by aluminum, and the great outdoors
Posts: 3,780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
for pete's sake the rest of the Airbii flash lever climb on the fma...how much more do you need!!!....is 380 the same?? and how could a call for go around be a surprise given the situation the aircraft was in??

Last edited by ironbutt57; 31st Aug 2013 at 16:19.
ironbutt57 is offline  
Old 31st Aug 2013, 17:19
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
AF has the sad record as being the airline that crashed for the first time every type of Airbus they had . (except the A380)
I couldn't help but notice the word "except" and tried to think of the exception
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 04:22
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Doomadgee
Posts: 281
Received 47 Likes on 25 Posts
Ironbutt-
Airbii flash lever climb on the fma...how much more do you need!!!....is 380 the same??
Yes- the 380 is the same

I believe the 380 is now fitted with a soft toga thrust setting, ie in a go around reduced thrust is applied.
Capn Rex Havoc is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 05:51
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,087
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Which any post 757 Boeing has done for years
stilton is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 07:15
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Over the Pacific mostly
Posts: 1,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
and how could a call for go around be a surprise given the situation the aircraft was in??
Fair question but I'm thinking that being hot and high is not a situation that suddenly happens, you can see it developing way before it does...! Don't be afraid to throw a hint out there now and then folks...! Jezz
The Dominican is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 09:05
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...and how could a call for go around be a surprise given the situation the aircraft was in??

Fair question but I'm thinking that being hot and high is not a situation that suddenly happens, you can see it developing way before it does...! Don't be afraid to throw a hint out there now and then folks...! Jezz
If we use NUTA to work out where the crew (and the FO especially) was, they were barely at the 'N'otice level as they certainly didn't 'U'nderstand let alone 'T'hink 'A'head as to the implications of the speed on the approach.

Irrespective of the design of the technology involved, this comes down to a total lack of awareness by the operating crew of the environment (aircraft capabilities/human interface and operational environment). Yet again AF have demonstrated poor airmanship and decision making, this time on a fleet that I would have thought comprised of their most capable pilots. It really is very worrying.

Last edited by TopBunk; 1st Sep 2013 at 09:06.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 09:29
  #56 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TB
It really is very worrying.
- absolutely. I'd like to think that most crews would have aired the subject of a g/a at least at 1840ft, and ideally a fair bit earlier, thus removing the 'surprise' factor a little.
BOAC is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 15:31
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Confusio Helvetica
Posts: 311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Point of information: Airbus, not Air France, won the Hull-Loss race with the A330. Air France operated up to 11 A310s for 18 years without losing one. They're only first on the A300, A320 and A340, and two of the three were maintenance issues.

The logic of the BEA study is interesting. It would seem that a good reason for a G/A is when the PF loses situational awareness. Evidently uttering those words alone doesn't get them ahead of the airplane again.

The Captain contacted ATC on four occasions to request a stabilisation attitude higher than that indicated in the procedure. These communications took up 13 of the 45 seconds of the duration of the go-around.
DingerX is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 15:43
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vega Constellation
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ATC Watcher, RE post #41

I'd stay clear of "PARFUM" or any other french mnemonic at this point.

It did not provide any kind of success over the past few years...

How about "fly the bl***y plane" ?

Last edited by FLEXPWR; 3rd Sep 2013 at 13:41. Reason: typo
FLEXPWR is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 15:44
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: on the golf course (Covid permitting)
Posts: 2,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're only first on the A300, A320 and A340, and two of the three were maintenance issues.
That makes it ok and should inspire confidence in AF then?

A supplementary question - what maintenance issues on the A300, A320 and A340 do you refer to, as opposed to pilot operational failings?

Last edited by TopBunk; 1st Sep 2013 at 15:48.
TopBunk is offline  
Old 1st Sep 2013, 18:20
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The Captain contacted ATC on four occasions to request a stabilisation attitude higher than that indicated in the procedure. These communications took up 13 of the 45 seconds of the duration of the go-around."

Don't know if ATC are aware of aircraft aTtitudes at any phase of flight, but they most certainly are interested in aLtitudes and their effect on the overall plot.

Hope this was what you meant?
BARKINGMAD is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.