Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Asiana flight crash at San Francisco

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Asiana flight crash at San Francisco

Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:16
  #101 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Age: 41
Posts: 691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slamer.
Looking at those images reminds me of BA38 ..!

yes I am sure Peter Burkill is watching with interest
liam548 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:18
  #102 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
I wonder what the FMA said? I wonder if they had RAD ALT issues?
I wonder if they had a bloody window to look out of, and knew what to do with it!!
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:20
  #103 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: away from home
Posts: 891
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re the L engine:


Is it tucked under the right side of the fuselage, behind the wing root? Looks like the fuselage may have ridden over it after it broke off?
That would help explain the lower fueselage damage and subsequent fire.
oceancrosser is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:20
  #104 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle
Age: 63
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wizofoz

The report will tell.
CityofFlight is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:25
  #105 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Australia
Age: 60
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This aircraft is a different model from the BA incident with different engines. It was a shorter flight, not winter, not Polar and therefore the fuel temperature could not have been a factor.
Most Korean Pilots I have flown with will autoland at every chance they can. Take that option away from them, then turn off the ILS and many will struggle, even in benign conditions.
ShockWave is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:26
  #106 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Guaranteed if this was a Korean crew that it was the first time in a long time conducting a visual approach without any form of vertical guidance available.

Just ask some of the guys here who have flown for Korean, Asiana etc.

Its either ILS to minimums or guaranteed CFIT.

What happened to briefing the threshold crossing height?
B-HKD is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:27
  #107 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gatters
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Debris at the start of the Runway (and in water)...

OxfordGold is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:28
  #108 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: US of Europe
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Even with all the learned lessons from previous accidents, all the rigorous crew selection and training, and strict regulations, it amazes me that this still happens. It makes me think they had some really severe technical difficulties. But then again, aircraft maintenance sector is also built upon trial&error and is constantly improving and implementing new rules... By textbook, this shouldn't have happened. I really look forward to unraveling this mystery and learning something from it.

Added... Some of you say ILS was inactive... So what? If OZ pilots cannot handle the airplane down without an autoland, then they are not pilots! How did they pass the sim when they were interviewed for the job? I don't know, a 777 crashed because they had to land visually? Come on...

Last edited by Flying Cheddar; 6th Jul 2013 at 21:34.
Flying Cheddar is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:29
  #109 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 86
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CNN just "interviewed" the alleged daughter of a passenger - after much jibberish about absolutely SFA, the dolt-interviewer finally asked her what her father had reported about the event. She replied: 'he knew they were going in too low and that it was going to happen....the tail of the plane hit first and then bounced...'

Interesting............
gwillie is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:29
  #110 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,409
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I may have been a little rash suggesting he'd put out a call - - there's a garbled, stepped on call just prior to everyone going around. The Asiana does call short finals - it's just after that. Prob not related, apologies.
The lack of landing aids sounds "exciting"....
The garbled call sounds to be another controller in the background saying "what's that over there..." In the background as he apparently starts seeing the crash in progress which immediately cuts off the transmitting controller who then must be looking too. Following a pause ATC starts sending everyone around.

Lack of PAPI and GS in beautiful VFR causing a visual to be a complex maneuver in particular in a modern glass cockpit aircraft with a trained air carrier crew is laughable.
canyonblue737 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:36
  #111 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: time2time
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Lack of PAPI and GS in beautiful VFR causing a visual to be a complex maneuver in particular in a modern glass cockpit aircraft with a trained air carrier crew is laughable."

I'd say that if this was the cause/contributory factor it's a sad state of affairs rather than laughable - I'd be inclined not to laugh when people are hurt/dead
Min Drag is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:36
  #112 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: LPPT
Age: 58
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
curious about altimeter settings ...
GearDown&Locked is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:37
  #113 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Wet Coast
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Graphic representation of approaches, yesterday and today.
PaperTiger is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:38
  #114 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: probably in the doghouse
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by B-HKD
Guaranteed if this was a Korean crew that it was the first time in a long time conducting a visual approach without any form of vertical guidance available.

Just ask some of the guys here who have flown for Korean, Asiana etc.

Its either ILS to minimums or guaranteed CFIT.
Bingo. You're spot on.
changer is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:39
  #115 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is supposedly the Professional pilots forum. Daytime, VFR, light winds; a professional airline pilot does not need an electronic glideslope or FMS GP to affect a safe landing. Visual 28L/R is the norm for landing at SFO. BTW, both runways are 11,000+.
Obama57 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:40
  #116 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Absolutely appalling PR approach. 2hrs plus have gone by and nothing on any of their websites which are all still 'business as usual'.

Most major carriers have plans to but up a holding page within 10 mins of a major incident.

Asian embaressment at loss of face being taken too far methinks.
Doors To Manuel is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:40
  #117 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 50 Likes on 32 Posts
Get off your high horse MD

Quite common to have pax exit the aircraft in sfo saying they thought we were going to land in the water when landing 28L/R. You're over water till about 100-150 AGL. I can understand their concern.

Last edited by West Coast; 6th Jul 2013 at 21:40.
West Coast is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:40
  #118 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Europe
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Having flown for several airlines in Asia including big blue I can suggest that a cocked up vis app with no slope guidance is very possible with some of these guys. It may turn out to be technical but it may not be that complex ar all.
AnQrKa is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:41
  #119 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: EUROPE
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what about a stall on short final? bad speeds on FMS? no time to react?

ORICHETTI is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 21:44
  #120 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PaperTiger's post above very telling indeed....
glad rag is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.