Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Asiana flight crash at San Francisco

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Asiana flight crash at San Francisco

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:42
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Seattle
Age: 63
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just seeing the tail and a lot of debris at the landing threshold. Am wondering if this was a hard tail strike?
CityofFlight is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Cheshire
Age: 62
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a live helicopter feed on Fox News and it has just shown the tail sat just before the runway threshold and marks on the ground over the embankment into the water on the approach.
LMLMLM is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:45
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I just saw a news report on NBC TV which featured a camera shot apparently taken from a news helicopter from somewhere over the bay northeast of the airport. From this perspective it appears that the airplane came to rest less than 100 feet left of rwy 28L just beyond the 1,000' aim point markers. 2 left side escape slides deployed, maybe 1L and 2L.
westhawk is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:46
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low speed ... high AOA ... late realization of a short touchdown ...
Non Zero is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:47
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moved up to a 16%er
Posts: 3,283
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Didn't a 777 land short before due to ice in the fuel?
PropPiedmont is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:48
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dublin
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2nd 777 hull loss, and it looks like deja vu all over again.

May be for different reasons, but it looks remarkably similar.

Last edited by Deacon Blues; 6th Jul 2013 at 19:48.
Deacon Blues is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:48
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Big Sky Country
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CNN showing extensive debris field on runway undershoot.
LME (GOD) is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:48
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reports are now saying all are accounted for.
direct ortac is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks very similar dynamic to the BA crash in LHR. Give the pilots the benefit of the doubt before we start accusing them of landing short and hard enough to rip of the tail and open the rear bulkhead like a tin of sardines on a fair weather day.

Last edited by 320DRIVER; 6th Jul 2013 at 19:49.
320DRIVER is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:49
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: On a survey line somewhere...
Age: 42
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Umm, is it just me, or do the passengers seem to be strolling out of the burning airplane with their carry on luggage?

sgs233a is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:49
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK
Age: 69
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
PropPiedmont

British Airways Flight 38 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Corsairoz is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:49
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Great Dunmow
Age: 49
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thought RR had issued a fix for the fuel icing issue...!
Warby74 is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Essex
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
777 Crash LHR. Engines didn't respond. Looks a little similar!!
800driver is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:50
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: over the rainbow
Age: 75
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing 777

Boeing 777

This is only the second hull loss accident for a Boeing 777, introduced in 1995. The previous accident was in 2008 when a British Airways 777 crashed short of the runway at London Heathrow due to engine failure.
roving is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:52
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: outside the box
Age: 40
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems like ENG nr2 separated from the wing and caught fire.. You can see from the photos that the engine fire has burned a hole in the fuselage next to the wing root!
Jetpipe. is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:53
  #36 (permalink)  
eqd
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: multiple places
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helicopter view of the apparent tail strike on the water berm way ahead of the zebra stripes:

http://theori.st/take_away/random/kt...30706_1240.jpg
eqd is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:53
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It does have similarities to the BA38 incident. This one had P+W engines. Dont know if the FOHE was a RR part or common to all 777's. Anyway, all are OK which is the main thing.

Last edited by direct ortac; 6th Jul 2013 at 19:54.
direct ortac is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:53
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Before all the armchair NTSB investigators think they have found the cause..

This aircraft had PW4090 engines. The BA aircraft involved in the LHR accident had RR Trent895 engines.

Either way, this proves again that the 777 is a tank. Of course the landing gear, and engines are gone, but the hull remained intact.
B-HKD is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:54
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Over here
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite perfect weather conditions, the aircraft has made contact with the rock wall / breakwater at the waters edge. This is well short of the threshold. The impact has taken the tail off and the aircraft has finished up off the runway with the engines detaching too. Thankfully all passengers and crew appear to have made it out of the wreckage. Reason for the undershoot yet to be determined.

Last edited by Blue Pineapple; 6th Jul 2013 at 19:58.
Blue Pineapple is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2013, 19:55
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Ireland
Posts: 1,167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems the tail contacted the very start of the runway, debris in the water and in the displaced threshold area, very quick stop which suggests it was a slow and short landing. Apparently all on board safe amazing news if true! Echoing the posts about crew bashing, we don't know the facts all though this has a certain BA38 esque feeling.
Jack1985 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.