Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Airbus A350 first flight video link

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Airbus A350 first flight video link

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14th Jun 2013, 11:43
  #21 (permalink)  
BRE
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are they trying to appeal to corporate decision makers or the flying public? If the later, somebody asking "stupid" question might be just the right choice.

Last edited by BRE; 14th Jun 2013 at 11:44.
BRE is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 11:55
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So little about the actual aircraft yet they are showing live footage of it.
It's almost as if they are talking down to the audience and I agree it is a really shoddy show.
gcal is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 12:31
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kingston upon Thames
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi,

First post here, so be gentle .

Great job by Airbus - he A350 looked fantastic in the air, although the presentation of the first flight could have stood some improvement.

Watching the live footage, I can see a small plume of white smoke from a vent on the bottom of the portd engine. What would that be, and is that normal given the time at idle after landing?.

Last edited by Endymion; 14th Jun 2013 at 12:36.
Endymion is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 12:36
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's cute from the front. Looks like a scaled-up 757 with even more scaled up engines, although it does still have that "pear-shaped" airbus plastron thing going on from behind.
awblain is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 12:55
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know why they have numbered the model variations from 800 up (800/900/1000) ? Why not A350-100 and upwards?
Philflies is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 13:07
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: VTBS
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's cute from the front. Looks like a scaled-up 757
Don't think so, looks more like a "caravelle" when the 757 was even not in the ball of his father...

Last edited by greenspinner; 14th Jun 2013 at 13:09.
greenspinner is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 13:13
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Pasadena
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why 800/900/1000?

To match its competitor in the composite airliner market?
awblain is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 13:14
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: VTBS
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does anyone know why they have numbered the model variations from 800 up (800/900/1000) ? Why not A350-100 and upwards
Just a guess, it's maybe the -100, -200, -300, -500, and -600 were already used in other programs (A300, 310, 320, 330 & 340) but Im' not sure.
greenspinner is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 13:22
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South East England
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 350 looks very distinctive with the new streamlined nose with black spectacle windows, the scimitar Whitcomb devices, the maintenance of fuselage cross section as far aft as possible, the close coupled engines, the small horizontal tail and the large wing root fairings extending under the belly.

All very proportionate, so that it doesn't look as big as it really is.

Last edited by Eclectic; 14th Jun 2013 at 14:42.
Eclectic is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 14:34
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The blasted heath
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It certainly looks right; and we all know the old saying
The cockpit windows put me in mind of a Trident!

The first flight 'ceremony' was strange but then again I've a feeling the product is going to sell itself.
gcal is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 14:43
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: U.K.
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am Boeing through and through .. however it does LOOK the part, which is a second for Airbus ( 1st .. A330). I am sure it will prove to be very successful ...

I agree .. it is a sloppy TV production, for what is probably not a sloppy product ...
Iron Duke is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 15:37
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 7,188
Received 382 Likes on 236 Posts
A350 XWB: A350-800, A350-900, A350-1000 - A350 photos, pictures, A350 videos, A350 3D view | Airbus | Airbus, a leading aircraft manufacturer

I played around with the 3-D toy at the airbus site, to get a look at her from varying angles.

A beautiful bird.
Lonewolf_50 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 15:44
  #33 (permalink)  
t7a
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: nr Bury St Edmunds
Posts: 122
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I believe that the Captain was Airbus chief test pilot - a buccaneer mate from way back.
t7a is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 15:57
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 1,642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The A350 was ready 3 days ago except it couldn't take off due to the French ATC strike
Mr Angry from Purley is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 16:27
  #35 (permalink)  
AR1
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Nottinghamshire
Age: 63
Posts: 710
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Cute as a button! - Coincidentally I've just been watching the gorgeous Thompson Dreamliner doing circuits over my garden near Robin Hood. I can't believe how quiet it is. - If AB have pulled the same trick living near airports is going to get a lot easier.
Not that it bothers me.
AR1 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 17:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Robin Hood". Where's that?
Bernoulli is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 18:03
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Robin Hood Airport
HalloweenJack is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 19:37
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: toofaraway
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
.. who live in a Nintendo world so far from reality.

Not long ago a first flight was to see if it flies.

Then to see whether it crashes on landing.

Today was not a simulator. Those pilots were risking
their lives and you complain about the tv presentation.

Believe me, the show was not marketing and has no impact on sales. Customers don't
care about the tv nor your opinion. This was a demonstration of engineering excellence.

Anoraks should be banished to an infested spotter's dungeon where they belong.

It was a real, dangerous, first test flight. Better understand that and rejoin the real world.

Last edited by toffeez; 14th Jun 2013 at 19:43.
toffeez is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 20:04
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ether here or there!
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
toffeez

Your last sentence, Here Here!
hedgehopper is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2013, 20:37
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I know it is very subjective, but to me the 350 seems far 'easier on the eye' than the 787. It will be interesting to see if both bring the promised efficiencies.
Cows getting bigger is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.