Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Pia being escorted by typhoons from man to stn

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Pia being escorted by typhoons from man to stn

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th May 2013, 17:23
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Undershoot
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
75 taken alive, 76 in a fix, 77 going to heaven. Some one told me this wickedness.. made it easy to remember
MarkJJ is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 17:55
  #42 (permalink)  
CH3CH2OH
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: The Pub
Posts: 519
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Yes don't put squawk codes here this is a special place, instead invest 2 seconds for a quick google and they're everywhere....

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transponder_(aviation)
5711N0205W is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 18:54
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: California
Age: 54
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nutters

I know facts are thin on the ground however I find it frustrating that passengers can try it on at will and then if unsuccessful they could be dismissed as "sorry I thought it was the loo door and i was desperate to get in" with a slap on the wrist.
Most likely this was a genuine false alarm however it is all too easy to trigger a full emergency response and incurr huge costs and distress. I really hope there is some point of law that can be brought against these kind of nutters and set an example. There has to be some dis-incentive or else we will end with every other flight going through a anti terrorism exercise.
xcitation is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 19:52
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: St Helens
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
7500 is unlawful interference (hijacking is given as an example) and the pic from Dak Man looks more like An F15 from lakenheath.
McTall is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 21:38
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
7500 is Interference not hijack, (7600 Comms, 7700 Emergency).
That's all been changed because too many people knew those codes.
I can't tell you the new ones or I'd have to kill you
Basil is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 21:41
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ww/W, I'm a seaman and airman of many years experience and I can assure you that scale and distance are/is very deceptive. Eyes, camera, recollection all lie.
Basil is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 22:39
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rennes
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A pair of halfwits having a row...

...who proceeded to talk themselves into an arrest, per the London Evening Standard:-

It is believed a passenger on the flight allegedly threatened to blow up the plane after other passengers tried to intervene in a row he was embroiled in. Murtaza Ali Shah, a journalist, said he had spoken to a friend on board the plane, Fakhir Iqbal, a political activist, who was sitting behind the man who made the threat. Mr Shah said his friend told him: "Two guys started a row with a girl and lots of other people. Some people tried to calm them and asked them not to be rowdy and abusive. Fakhir told them to calm down. They said 'don't bloody speak to us or we will blow up the plane'. The crew came and spoke to them and they were openly threatening the staff. Fakhir went to other crew members and told them they were making threats."

Two men quizzed on mid-air 'fight' | London Evening Standard
Blind Squirrel is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 22:48
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A silly question - what is the purpose of scrambling fighters if the comms were normal? Or let me re-phrase it: what is the chain of decision making in UK to shoot down an airliner?
CargoOne is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 22:54
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Stansted is the airport of choice for the UK government to divert aircraft...
because geographically it is near the East coast in an area of low population compared to Manchester or Heathrow and also because with a prevailing wind across the UK of West to East, any incident which might involve toxicity, such as chemical or nuclear, will likely result in dangerous substances being blown out to sea, rather than over areas of dense population.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 24th May 2013, 23:07
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All in all, a good result.

Passengers and machine safe.

A good Action by RAF, which will assist in training.

I really fail to see what all the kerfuffle is about.

Nutters or drunks will be charged.

PIA continues it's good case as an Airline of choice
garpal gumnut is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 01:52
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: ***
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A silly question - what is the purpose of scrambling fighters if the comms were normal? Or let me re-phrase it: what is the chain of decision making in UK to shoot down an airliner?
Not so silly, me thinks.

I would think hard on who to tell what in sn incident like this. Depending on the country you are over, maybe nothing,just declare emergency and land.
There are those itchy trigger fingers...

Last edited by Admiral346; 25th May 2013 at 01:53.
Admiral346 is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 08:24
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 255
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm assuming there weren't any Air Marshals on board, but in a scenario like this, surely they would have intervened? I'm kind of surprised there weren't any Air Marshals on board especially from a higher risk country like Pakistan...
pull-up-terrain is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 09:36
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: England
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yesterday i asked why the moderators are they allowing the discussion of sensitive transponder codes, but the mere mention of a certain middle east airline and your immediately censored.

I am aware this information is available if you dig enough, but don't believe that it should be broadcast on a forum open to the public.

Safety first my arse.
tonker is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 09:59
  #54 (permalink)  

More than just an ATCO
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Up someone's nose
Age: 75
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could it have been being escorted out of a different European Airspace to the UK, Belgium or Holland maybe, don't they have F-16s?
Seems to have happened near GOLES so would have come via MUAC Delta Sectors. SOP there is F16s
Lon More is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 12:03
  #55 (permalink)  
25F
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Why are they "sensitive transponder codes"? If there is anything secret about ATC procedures not covered somewhere in these 700 pages:
http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Order/ATC.pdf,
do you really think that it would be hard for the Bad Guys to find out?
25F is offline  
Old 25th May 2013, 12:50
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kent
Age: 65
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The transponder codes are publicly available from many sites - just Google 'transponder codes UK' and nearly half a million results come up. Pprune is not the first result in the search. We're certainly not giving highly secret information away.
overthewing is offline  
Old 26th May 2013, 12:25
  #57 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
PPRuNe Radar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1997
Location: Europe
Posts: 3,228
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seems to have happened near GOLES so would have come via MUAC Delta Sectors. SOP there is F16s
There was no incident notified prior to reaching UK airspace, so although your reasoning is logical and sound, it's all simply down to the Daily Fail getting it wrong and publishing a photo from a totally different event.

We can put that part of this topic discussion to bed now.

Thanks

PR
PPRuNe Radar is offline  
Old 26th May 2013, 19:46
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: guess where...
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 33 made me chucle but instead of a DON'T PANIC button better make that a towel
Daermon ATC is offline  
Old 26th May 2013, 22:49
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: U.K
Age: 41
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basil i find our story VERY hard to believe. If you ask people who have lived and worked in the middle east you will find there are two sets of rules. one set for GCC and the other for non-GCC. If you are non-GCC they are far from lenient.
Sable Knight is offline  
Old 27th May 2013, 12:31
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Basil i find our story VERY hard to believe. If you ask people who have lived and worked in the middle east you will find there are two sets of rules. one set for GCC and the other for non-GCC. If you are non-GCC they are far from lenient.
Did you mean "your story".
If so, don't listen to your friends; speak to someone who's been there, done it, got the T-shirt.
Bas - GF 4yrs living in Manama, frequent trips to DXB whilst working for CX, trips to Persian Gulf whilst working for BA.
Basil is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.