Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Cityjet Mayday STN

Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Cityjet Mayday STN

Old 9th Apr 2013, 16:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cityjet Mayday STN

Had to hold over STN this morning due to full emergency with a 146 from CityFlyer diverting into STN. Runway was closed for awhile as they could not get off the runway after landing.

When we finally got in we saw it parked on the Bravo's - nothing on AvHerald. Just curious if anyone knows the reason I nearly ended up in Luton.

Last edited by Utrinque; 9th Apr 2013 at 16:48.
Utrinque is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 17:56
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1601
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BA CityFlyer Mayday STN

There were 3 today, one of them being an EZY
TOWTEAMBASE is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 18:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 34
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It was a CityJet RJ85. CityFlyer don't operate them anymore. Aircraft couldn't retract flaps on departure at LCY so had to divert to Stansted for a landing at higher than normal speed.

Last edited by DavidWoodward; 9th Apr 2013 at 18:10.
DavidWoodward is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 18:11
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mayday! For that? In an RJ!?
Lord Spandex Masher is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 18:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Incident: Cityjet RJ85 at London on Apr 9th 2013, flaps problems
Roooob is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 18:39
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Manchester, UK
Age: 34
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't believe they declared a mayday although I may be wrong. I believe they just reported issues with the flaps and simply diverted to STN because of the longer runway.
DavidWoodward is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 19:13
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More than a little strange that they could not get off the runway if it was just a flap problem. STN broadcast declared "the full emergency finished" shortly after we switched to ground - sounds a bit more than flap issues non?
Utrinque is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 19:16
  #8 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: London
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the answer ...

Incident: Cityjet RJ85 at London on Apr 9th 2013, flaps problems
Utrinque is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 19:27
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Deepest darkest Inbredland....
Posts: 607
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A Mayday was declared as there were other issues which presented themselves. Aircraft stopped on runway to be checked out before taxying to stand. The broadcast to cancel the emergency is made on the relevant frequency so that all the involved people know.
terrain safe is offline  
Old 9th Apr 2013, 22:04
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Planet Claire
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You should change the thread title as it plainly had nothing to do with BA Cityflyer.
AtomKraft is offline  
Old 10th Apr 2013, 20:43
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Greystation
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget that an ATC "full emergency" can be something very different to an aircraft "mayday".
5milesbaby is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 08:03
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: UK
Posts: 2,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I recall being very surprised on a visit to STN tower some years ago when I was told that merely mentioning any technical trouble at all, even something as innocuous as "we've got a minor electrical problem" with no urgency declared their reaction is a mandatory "Aircraft Crash Imminent" state which seemed utterly OTT and frankly subverts our PAN/MAYDAY system. Perhaps an ATCer here could illuminate us?
Agaricus bisporus is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 09:49
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
About 15 years ago we diverted into STN with an A300 because the gear would not retract and we had maintenance there. We told ATC that we had 3 greens and there was no problem, however they had lots of emergency vehicles out to greet us.
After landing I spoke to the fire chief and told him that the only problem was that we couldn't get it up. He suggested we use Viagra next time.

If you speak to airport emergency people they will tell you they would rather be called out early and not be required than be called out late to attend a pile of smoking wreckage.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 09:54
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Deepest darkest Inbredland....
Posts: 607
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't know when your visit was, but I suspect that you may have got the wrong end of the stick! Aircraft accident imminent is only used when the aircraft will land with damage or sustain damage on landing, that is all. Generally if a 'technical problem' is the reason given then we will call a Local Standby. This will involve only the local AFS who will turn out and watch the aircraft land and then have a quick chat to the pilot before standing down. The next level is Full Emergency. This is a more responsive callout and some of the local emergency services will also come in just in case. Then we get to Aircraft Ground Incident, Aircraft Accident Imminent and Aircraft Accident. Basically, all the same but mainly vary according to the stage of flight or movement on the airfield. All bells and whistles as there has been damage sustained or people injured. There are other emergencies too, but this is a simplified view. Generally if a hydraulic problem is reported we will call a full emergency, but if the nose wheel will not extend then aircraft accident imminent is the one.

Hope this very simplified answer helps.
terrain safe is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 11:56
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,612
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
He suggested we use Viagra next time.
15 years ago? Cut the porkies, dixi!
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 12:00
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: In the Doghouse
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The little blue pill has been lifting men since 1998.......

Last edited by sled dog; 11th Apr 2013 at 12:03.
sled dog is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 12:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,612
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Originally Posted by Wiki
Since becoming available in 1998, sildenafil
Fair enough! I was younger then...
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 11th Apr 2013, 16:33
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Dorset UK
Age: 70
Posts: 1,920
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Bloggs.

Just Checked my log book.
31 August 1998 D-ASAA (became G-CEXI) Shannon to Dresden. Diverted to Stansted due unable to retract gear.

I think Viagra was a popular topic of conversation about that time.
dixi188 is offline  
Old 12th Apr 2013, 05:25
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,612
Received 101 Likes on 58 Posts
Diverted to Stansted due unable to retract gear.

I think Viagra was a popular topic of conversation about that time.
Did you conclude that (the new) Viagra would have enabled you to retract the gear?
Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 14th Apr 2013, 15:20
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Scotland
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agaricus,

I stand to be corrected but I believe a lot of the ATC / airport emergency procedures stem from years back when, with less spare power and redundancy, the loss of a hydraulic system or engine was a major issue for a large aircraft. Sadly as aircraft systems and performance have improved, the liability culture seems to have worsened and I suspect few airports would be keen to downgrade their emergency response criteria.

And in no way does it subvert the PAN/MAYDAY system - that's just to get you down safely and as expeditiously as you want. The number of trucks that meet you later is almost a secondary matter, although we appreciate it can be bad PR from the passenger viewpoint. Often, for a "local standby" the AFS will stay at a discreet distance and follow you to stand rather than surround you with excitement and blue light...
NudgingSteel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.