FAA Grounds 787s
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: South Korea
Age: 62
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Speed of Sound:
Are you saying this is the new battery containment box for the 787? What is your source?
Mostlylurking:
It does not look like a gludge to me. This is what I would expect the box to look like. It looks very strong and profesionally built. I am sure the weight is a bit of an issue but im am sure it is lighter than a NiCad in a box. According to an earlier post a LI has about 10 times the energy density of a Nicad
Kerosense Kraut:
You are right, the new box is not addressing the root cause of the fault. It is not a fix. It is there for that 1 in 10,000,000 chance of failure. The root cause is a bit sketchy but it seems the other changes such as modifying the max charge limit are addressing the root cause.
Sorry I dont know how to make the fancy blue quote boxes.
Are you saying this is the new battery containment box for the 787? What is your source?
Mostlylurking:
It does not look like a gludge to me. This is what I would expect the box to look like. It looks very strong and profesionally built. I am sure the weight is a bit of an issue but im am sure it is lighter than a NiCad in a box. According to an earlier post a LI has about 10 times the energy density of a Nicad
Kerosense Kraut:
You are right, the new box is not addressing the root cause of the fault. It is not a fix. It is there for that 1 in 10,000,000 chance of failure. The root cause is a bit sketchy but it seems the other changes such as modifying the max charge limit are addressing the root cause.
Sorry I dont know how to make the fancy blue quote boxes.
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: huntsvegas
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Make it Four...
those three incidents plus the battery pack that Secura burned up in 2006--do you suppose that overcharging just might possibly be involved here, considering the charred remains of a battery thermal runaway, even though supposedly the FDR did not show evidence of overcharge and thus thermal runaway did not occur. Seeing is not believing...
What connects to the battery pack? The battery charger unit and the APU controller. One is a current source, the other a current sink. Overcharging can be caused by overcurrent too, not just overvoltage...although 32 volts is too high for trickle charging that chemistry.
What connects to the battery pack? The battery charger unit and the APU controller. One is a current source, the other a current sink. Overcharging can be caused by overcurrent too, not just overvoltage...although 32 volts is too high for trickle charging that chemistry.
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ireland
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool Guys, TURIN et al.
Sorry about the size of the picture guys.
You can't upload photos on this forum so it is a link to a high definition pic. I have now downloaded it, resized it and uploaded and linked to my Photobucket site.
I assume you guys are using a different browser to me. Mine resizes any photo to 'fit the box'.
The source is Boeing themselves.
The Boeing Company: Commercial Airplanes - 787 Electrical and Battery Systems Photos
My second thought was that visual inspection and maintenance of this unit is not going to be quick!
You can't upload photos on this forum so it is a link to a high definition pic. I have now downloaded it, resized it and uploaded and linked to my Photobucket site.
I assume you guys are using a different browser to me. Mine resizes any photo to 'fit the box'.
The source is Boeing themselves.
The Boeing Company: Commercial Airplanes - 787 Electrical and Battery Systems Photos
My second thought was that visual inspection and maintenance of this unit is not going to be quick!
Paxing All Over The World
The first picture (as shown earlier in thread without the cover) has this caption on the Boeing site:
Eeerr, sorry guys but it does NOT eliminate the potential for fire!!! The potential is exactly the same as before. 
Caption: View of new 787 battery enclosure, which adds another layer of protection and eliminates the potential for fire. (Door not shown)
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cool Guys:
Step 1. Hit the "Quote button" (words inside a balloon icon) from the format bar in the reply screen.
Step 2. Paste in the words you want to quote.
Rinse and repeat as needed.
glad rag:
This photo (follow link) shows the cover as well as the box. Clearly the cables shown connected to the battery in the open box constitute a test harness. The way the real cables come out of the box is much different.
And yes, replacing the battery inside the box will be much more difficult.
Sorry I dont know how to make the fancy blue quote boxes.
Step 2. Paste in the words you want to quote.
Rinse and repeat as needed.
glad rag:
This photo (follow link) shows the cover as well as the box. Clearly the cables shown connected to the battery in the open box constitute a test harness. The way the real cables come out of the box is much different.
And yes, replacing the battery inside the box will be much more difficult.
Last edited by inetdog; 19th Mar 2013 at 00:51.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Grobelling through the murk to the sunshine above.
Age: 60
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It says:
"Caution. Electrostatic Sensitive Device, Conductive Connector Cap Required".
"Caution. Electrostatic Sensitive Device, Conductive Connector Cap Required".
Last edited by Pub User; 19th Mar 2013 at 08:28.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: On the ground too often
Age: 49
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This photo (follow link) shows the cover as well as the box. Clearly the cables shown connected to the battery in the open box constitute a test harness. The way the real cables come out of the box is much different.
And yes, replacing the battery inside the box will be much more difficult.
And yes, replacing the battery inside the box will be much more difficult.
I wonder how the case will be vented?
Replacing the battery - about 40 additional screws to undo. Unless - perhaps - the LRU will be the battery and the case.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what is their concept for operating the box? With a single hot cell will you have to shut down the entire battery and divert? Declare an emergency? What does all this mean for ETOPS?
Last edited by Kerosene Kraut; 19th Mar 2013 at 10:38.
which adds another layer of protection and eliminates the potential for fire
Replacing the battery - about 40 additional screws to undo. Unless - perhaps - the LRU will be the battery and the case.
Oh, wait a minute.
Sos. Thanks very much.
Plastic PPRuNer
"Honestly, if this nonsense had gone out under Boeing's name in Phil Condit's time then HE would have needed a Firebox to contain him !"
Phil Condit eh? Hmmm....
Boeing: What Really Happened - Businessweek
Phil Condit eh? Hmmm....
Boeing: What Really Happened - Businessweek
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: on land
Age: 60
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
??
The pictures, the '...eliminates the potential for fire' captions are made for public consumption I assume. So I'll be generous and surmise they mean a CABIN fire 
But that would mean Boeing thinks we (pax) are all simpletons, perfectly happy to share a fuselage with a fire/potential fire of ANY kind, no matter how well they claim it's contained. That can't be right can it? They can't be so desperate to restart deliveries that they think we'd swallow that??
But that would mean Boeing thinks we (pax) are all simpletons, perfectly happy to share a fuselage with a fire/potential fire of ANY kind, no matter how well they claim it's contained. That can't be right can it? They can't be so desperate to restart deliveries that they think we'd swallow that??
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the edge of madness
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if the FAA approve this lash-up it doesn't necessarily follow that EASA will does it? Or will Boeing then scream Airbus favouritism and protectionism . . . And I can't see the JCAA being pushed into something as apparently unsatisfactory as this either. Boeing seem to have modified their philosophy from "safety above all else" to "safety above all else within reason and provided it can be achieved quickly and with as little disruption and cost as possible" . . .
I for one am not going to rush to fly on it - at least on ETOPS routes.
I for one am not going to rush to fly on it - at least on ETOPS routes.
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: toofaraway
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Phil Condit
Was the only Boeing boss in recent times that Airbus respected and was afraid of. Same goes for his beautiful baby the 777.
The rest, "managers" and products, (747-8, 737Max & 787) are poor, pale, competitors.
The rest, "managers" and products, (747-8, 737Max & 787) are poor, pale, competitors.
.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Hotel Gypsy
Posts: 2,821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Genuinely ignorant SLF question.
If I were a passenger and I pitched-up with such a battery in a 'fireproof' box, would I be allowed to check it in as hold baggage?
If I were a passenger and I pitched-up with such a battery in a 'fireproof' box, would I be allowed to check it in as hold baggage?