Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Aurela (Operating for Monarch) off the runway at BHX

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Aurela (Operating for Monarch) off the runway at BHX

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Sep 2012, 16:17
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: london
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BBC News24 presenter asked the question 'Why didn't the pilot just put the engines into reverse?'.

Presumably this is just a case of reversing the terminals on the starter motors.
andrewruk is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 16:20
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Wrong Town
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has Weaver managed to get a job flying 737s?
FSXPilot is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 16:24
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Hassocks, Mid-Sussex
Age: 67
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And there I was believing Monarch drivers didn't enjoy playing in the rough!
Grenville Fortescue is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 16:39
  #44 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Royal Leamington Spa
Age: 78
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is Aurela of Lithuania operating for MON
This was a cost-saving measure.

Has Weaver managed to get a job flying 737s?
No, as he failed the Aurela aptitude test.
Anthony Supplebottom is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 16:48
  #45 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Rugby
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Monarch do seem to be having trouble recently with their sub-contractors.
Dawdler is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:03
  #46 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Very close to the Theatre of Dreams!
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Daily Mails Coverage of the incident is hilarious, it would be interesting to know who their "aviation" source was

Terrified tourists evacuated from plane after it overshot the runway and skidded onto grass at Birmingham Airport | Mail Online
Rob Courtney is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:07
  #47 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Midlands
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
According to BBC news, who in turn say they got it from MON, this is the same aircraft that was involved in the TFS incident last month
Burnie5204 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:28
  #48 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Liverpool
Age: 32
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Daily Mails Coverage of the incident is hilarious, it would be interesting to know who their "aviation" source was

Terrified tourists evacuated from plane after it overshot the runway and skidded onto grass at Birmingham Airport | Mail Online
They really do know how to sensationalise.....

Though having flown Monarch several times to the Canaries, and viewed them as a fairly premium airline similar to, say, Thompson/Tui, what in the hell were they thinking by leasing shonky Lithuanian sheds??? How does that even begin to fit their airline profile??
mat777 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:51
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,812
Received 199 Likes on 92 Posts
Only the Mail could manage to combine

"Terrified tourists evacuated"

and

"There was no shouting, no panicking - people were just laughing. It was all very British."

in the same article.
DaveReidUK is online now  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:56
  #50 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: La Lucerne, France
Age: 73
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just back from BHX collecting my daughter who was on the Monarch service from Nice. She took a pic within 30 seconds of the plane coming to a stop which appears to show the slats not deployed. Is it unusual for the slats to be retracted so quickly in a situation such as this?
Andrew Bowyer is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:57
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You get what you pay for. Monarch that is, not the poor pax who were expecting a Monarch flight!
WHYEYEMAN is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:57
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Polymer Records
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re The Daily Mail's article, was this actually a hilarious and ironic self parody perhaps?

'It is lucky nobody got hurt - if the plane was coming in at speed, it's a dangerous way to come into land.
Artie Fufkin is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 17:57
  #53 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Am amazed that a Company like Monarch could have a Ratner moment like this.

If I had booked Monarch (an airline which I hold in high esteem) and a Lithuanian aircraft turned up I would not be at all impressed. I gather this isn't just an ad hoc sub charter due an a/c outage but a planned used of another operator.

When will these Companies understand that if you leave operational decisions to accountants based purely on the bottom line they surely will end up in the mud or even worse?
fireflybob is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:04
  #54 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Cologne
Age: 34
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just back from BHX collecting my daughter who was on the Monarch service from Nice. She took a pic within 30 seconds of the plane coming to a stop which appears to show the slats not deployed. Is it unusual for the slats to be retracted so quickly in a situation such as this?
I've just noticed they weren't out watching ITV news, do we know if they were ever out?
Lizz is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:04
  #55 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Finsbury Park
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Severely Injured

severe injuries to the airline's reputation, thank goodness nobody was actually hurt.
Alycidon is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:05
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: England
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why does everyone seem to be so shocked at Monarch daring to use a Lithuanian based airline?

I've dealt with Aurela many times, and while not the finest aircraft in the sky they do the job and usually do it well. Interior wise they aren't too bad, at least not for a -300.

Virtually all airlines, certainly UK charters at least, sub-charter in various aircraft, even BA have been doing it recently.
750XL is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:10
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: In the circuit
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm interested in this one, as I was on this aircraft a couple of times last month.

Firstly flagging up that I am pax, not aviation in any way.

From the perspective of what I paid for it was a rubbish product, and I have written to Monarch to express my dissatisfaction. Although there is no reason that an old well maintained aircraft should present any greater degree of risk its not impressive to turn up and find a 24 yr old 300 that has seen better days. That's a separate matter.

I had no problem with the operation of the flight which from my limited pax perspective seemed fine.

Have I got anything to say that is relevant to this incident? I don't think so, except to note that on the flights I was on reverse was never used on landing. Whether this was operational or because it was inoperative I couldn't say. I've no idea whether you could defer reverser issues (if they were present) this long anyway as it was a month ago when I travelled.

Last edited by Groundbased; 21st Sep 2012 at 18:17.
Groundbased is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:11
  #58 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Choroni, sometimes
Posts: 1,974
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've dealt with Aurela many times, and while not the finest aircraft in the sky they do the job and usually do it well. Interior wise they aren't too bad, at least not for a -300.

Virtually all airlines, certainly UK charters at least, sub-charter in various aircraft, even BA have been doing it recently.
Hopefully you are SLF...

Have you ever had a look behind the curtain concerning airline culture, flight crew training, flight crew standards?

Small airlines can't hardly compete in these safety related areas.

Okay, forget about AF....

Last edited by hetfield; 21st Sep 2012 at 18:15.
hetfield is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:13
  #59 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 3,982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
She took a pic within 30 seconds of the plane coming to a stop which appears to show the slats not deployed. Is it unusual for the slats to be retracted so quickly in a situation such as this?
Flaps retracted in after landing checks? If the slats were not deployed for landing this would be a non normal to say the least!

On the B737 have had at least one case where a cable to nose wheel steering failed which stopped us going anywhere - but we avoided the grass - just one possibility?

From Wiki:-

On 12 July 2012, Monarch announced that it was to wet-lease two B737-300s from Aurela and Small Planet Airlines as well as two B737-400s from Air Explore and Air Italy from the end of July to be able to offer additional flights during the peak leisure travel season in the UK.

Last edited by fireflybob; 21st Sep 2012 at 18:21.
fireflybob is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 18:13
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
indeed!
babymike737 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.