Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AMR pilot demands information from ATC about terror threat

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AMR pilot demands information from ATC about terror threat

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Sep 2012, 15:28
  #61 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well PENKO...if you agree with West Coast, then you and I agree as well
MadDog Driver is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2012, 16:05
  #62 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Far Side
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some aircraft (but by no means all) are no doubt equipped for mobile phone service, but as far as I am aware, a mobile phone, suitable to the area of operations is not yet a required item for flight crew.
Particularly on the Helsinki flight, they would have had to shuffle sim cards and service providers to call the number, and it is by no means certain that mobile phones are a reliable form of emergency communication.
Or have I been out of touch too long?
ZQA297/30 is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2012, 22:41
  #63 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Some aircraft (but by no means all) are no doubt equipped for mobile phone service, but as far as I am aware, a mobile phone, suitable to the area of operations is not yet a required item for flight crew.
Particularly on the Helsinki flight, they would have had to shuffle sim cards and service providers to call the number, and it is by no means certain that mobile phones are a reliable form of emergency communication.
Or have I been out of touch too long?
A crew on a U.S. carrier would almost certainly have immediate access to cell phone communication while taxiing in to JFK from an international flight in my experience.

Sometimes the access is a little too immediate, I've had coworkers texting and checking voicemail before I can stow the spoilers when exiting the runway.

The AA captain had a lot on his mind no doubt and it is the case in the U.S. system that the captain is often one of the last to be informed when there is a deviation from the original plan of operation (don't ask me how I know ).

The tower was probably just trying to be discreet by asking for a phone call. Unlike with the old analog AMPS system, modern digital cellphone transmissions are extremely hard to monitor without cooperation from the service provider from what I can see.
Airbubba is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2012, 23:10
  #64 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Age: 69
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends . . . .

. . . how long your sleeper agent at "bargain moby fones R us" has been embedded, I suppose.

(For #69)

Last edited by ILoadMyself; 20th Sep 2012 at 23:15. Reason: Fatigue and technical ineptitude
ILoadMyself is offline  
Old 20th Sep 2012, 23:16
  #65 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No airline pilot is required to have a cell phone and therefore the captain was required to be notified of what was going on. If not told what is going on you have to assume the worst if surrounded by emergency vehicles.

The captain is always required to be told the status of his aircraft. I don't think they will pull this bonehead procedure again. Good job captain.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 00:16
  #66 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also for you cell phone call advocates, the captains cell phone is off so would take a minute to even make a call possible. Give me a break. He forced them to tell them what he should have already been told by regulations. He is the PIC and needs to know what is happening with his flight. Everybody seemed to know but him. He had to make a decision with no input. He put it on them. Good for him.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 00:49
  #67 (permalink)  
Dushan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Originally Posted by West Coast

Well done skipper.

Welcome back, skipper
 
Old 21st Sep 2012, 05:54
  #68 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: surfing, watching for sharks
Posts: 4,076
Received 53 Likes on 33 Posts
Thanks! Wandering the desert has its advantages as well.
West Coast is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 07:59
  #69 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A crew on a U.S. carrier would almost certainly have immediate access to cell phone communication while taxiing in to JFK from an international flight in my experience.
That doesn't mean that they should be required to use it though, especially considering that an unlisted phone number probably won't be recorded either.

The tower was probably just trying to be discreet by asking for a phone call. Unlike with the old analog AMPS system, modern digital cellphone transmissions are extremely hard to monitor without cooperation from the service provider from what I can see.
Agree with that, although they were probably only worried about the media getting their hands on a recording of the conversation and not about "terrorists hiding in the wheel wells with a gas mask" and possibly with a short-wave scanner too, for good measure.
The skipper's first responsibility is however towards his passengers and not towards ATC or Homeland Security or whomever was trying to avoid publicity.

Ciao,

Dg800
Dg800 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 09:43
  #70 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Far Side
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wonder if there is a case for a discrete scrambled channel for emergency secure comms?

Last edited by ZQA297/30; 21st Sep 2012 at 09:44. Reason: spelling
ZQA297/30 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 11:43
  #71 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Milano
Age: 53
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't know about the US of A but scrambling radio transmissions is definitely illegal in many jurisdictions, at least for civilian applications. Big Brother wants to be able to watch you.
Dg800 is offline  
Old 21st Sep 2012, 12:17
  #72 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Kentucky
Age: 77
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Missing Option

How did we ever miss the idea that they surrounded the wrong plane and refused to admit their mistake.
gleaf is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.