Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

ICAO publishes study on Phraseology

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

ICAO publishes study on Phraseology

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Aug 2012, 14:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I once flew with an Indian captain. He told me that there were no less than 94 different languages and dialects being used on the Indian Sub Continent. The English language was the only common thread between all of them and, without it, they simply would not be able to communicate with one another.
JW411 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 14:50
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 0ft AGL
Age: 33
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wanted to ask if B738driver is gonna learn Russian then...

Basic language isn't enough to understand conversation between two native speakers on fast speed, or are you going to "Excusez-moi, je ne comprends pas. Pouvez vous répéter s'il vous plait?" each time you don't understand something when on approach to CDG? I don't think someone that just learned basic language will have time to do that.

Should long-haul EK driver (for example) learn Chinese, Portuguese, French, Japanese etc..?

Anyway, there are procedures, lets stick to them. Please?
JohnieWalker is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 15:23
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: -
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How true. Spain cannot even get itself together to introduce it as a compulsory part of the school curriculum. Every country is rightly proud of its language and has an absolute right to use it. However, when there are issues of safety, a common language and phrasing must be agreed and taught. This does not mean that, for example, Spain's dominant language should be anything other than Spanish. It does mean that English (or another agreed universal language) should be taught as part of the learning curriculum.
Do you seriously propose that a Russian who was born in Russia and is going to stay in Russia, suddenly HAS to learn another language than his own? BULL****, Russia has not been conquered by any english speaking country and therefore we will not make it compulsory to study foreign languages "as part of the learning curriculum". They are learned on a strictly voluntary basis and it will stay as such. You, or anyone else from your country, have no say in this matter.

Last edited by ap08; 27th Aug 2012 at 15:25.
ap08 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 15:25
  #24 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will there ever come a time when there is a universal World language? 100years, 1000years or perhaps when the Martians invade the Earth.
jxk is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 15:33
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tring, UK
Posts: 1,834
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Will there ever come a time when there is a universal World language?
Mi ne komprenas vin, mi estas komencanto de Esperanto!
FullWings is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 16:24
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glasgow
Age: 40
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jxk
Will there ever come a time when there is a universal World language? 100years, 1000years or perhaps when the Martians invade the Earth.
Doubt it, but I bet there will be some sort of electronic gizmo that does inline, instant translation.
Or maybe I've watched too much Star Trek...

Will all be great - until the batteries run out and no one can talk to anyone...
riverrock83 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 19:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Wherever it is this month
Posts: 1,784
Received 75 Likes on 34 Posts
Russia has not been conquered by any english speaking country and therefore we will not make it compulsory to study foreign languages "as part of the learning curriculum"
England hasn't been invaded, let alone conquered, by anyone since the development of the English language. Doesn't stop us having compulsory foreign language study from age 7!
Easy Street is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 20:21
  #28 (permalink)  

Aviator Extraordinaire
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oklahoma City, Oklahoma USA
Age: 76
Posts: 2,394
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
perhaps when the Martians invade
I'll go with the Martians invasion.

Must say that on my last, which turned out to really be my last, trip into China, I was quite impressed with the level of English spoken by the Chinese controllers in the major cities and the upper airways structure.
con-pilot is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 20:21
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The foot of Mt. Belzoni.
Posts: 2,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surely a "Single European Sky" will mean a single language?
As it caters for 'customers' (as SESAR ANSP managers are keen to point out to ATCOs that aircrew are), from The Americas, then English is the obvious choice.
Standardization, innit?

Last edited by ZOOKER; 27th Aug 2012 at 20:22.
ZOOKER is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 20:31
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New Zealand
Age: 61
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bring back babelfish!
towerguy is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 20:38
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Another Planet.
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BABEL BABBLE

Perhaps if French ATC controllers were given a course in how to say two as in tu as in too and three as in tree then some of the confusion would disappear overnight, mes amis...........?????
BARKINGMAD is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 21:09
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easystreet

"England hasn't been invaded let alone conquered etc"


How about October 14th 1066. Defeat of King Harold and his English army by Duke William II of Normandy at Sentiac Hill, Hastings.

Didn't stop the English language, as it was at the time, remaining predominant though.
gusting_45 is offline  
Old 27th Aug 2012, 23:32
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Do you seriously propose that a Russian who was born in Russia and is going to stay in Russia, suddenly HAS to learn another language than his own?
Yes - I do.
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 00:06
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: a few track miles south of BEKOL
Age: 57
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quebec is similar to France and there are a lot of American and international flights into Montreal every day. ATC speaks very good English but often speaks French to francophone crews so it can hinder SA of some of the non French speakers.

In the VFR world, most local pilots speak/understand both English and French so you hear both on the en-route frequencies and i would guess over 90% understand the other language perfectly well.

However, there are a lot of Chinese (and other nationalities) students in Quebec whose English is OK but heavily accented. When i am flying VFR with bilingual locals, they really struggle to understand what the Chinese are saying (in English) although for anyone who has spent time in China, it is pretty clear.

To my mind, whether in IFR or VFR, an effort should be made to use one language (English) even between two people who share a common other language. We should be concerned with everyone's SA, not just our own.
bigjames is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 00:53
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Wales
Age: 73
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As far as I understand it ICAO SARPS are not compulsary, any member can publish a difference and thats the end of.

To me the worst abusers of the system are 1. The UK. Its our language and we cannot even follow ICAO. 2. The USA. You use our language and have even more differences. 3. Australia same as above.

Before we English speakers start preaching to the rest of the world lets get our own houses in order and accept the SARPS.

Any International language school will tell you that to learn conversational English will take 2 years of total immersion. (live in an English speaking country).
TonyDavis is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 05:00
  #36 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Perhaps we could speak in numbers. Numbers are universal (except for ancient Romans) across the World and work well when ordering food or wine.

Therefore: 1 = Request pushback, 2 = Cleared pushback, 3 = Request taxi to hold, 4 = Cleared taxi to hold, etc.
Analysing the above it becomes clear that Odd numbers become a 'Request' and Even numbers a 'Response'. Not sure what the response to Easythere 69 would be though!

Meanwhile I found the following book very interesting:
The Language Instinct is a 1994 book by Steven Pinker. Written for a general audience, it argues that humans are born with an innate capacity for language.
.
jxk is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 07:27
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ---
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I actually am amazed by the lack of standardization in the countries where English is no problem.
Why are there differences between FAA, UK CAA, Eurocontrol and Icao??
Maybe get a straight line on hat is "standard" and take it from there..
ray cosmic is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 08:11
  #38 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 73
Posts: 3,669
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This subject comes back every year on PPrune, and inevitably comes down to French on the frequency,and ends up in "them against us" .
And every year I come up here to tell the same simple things :
Bad, wrong or lack of using standard Phraseology has killed, and will kill far,far more than dual language use.
Yes a single language would be great , like peace on earth and a single loving religion for everyone.
In absence of that stick to Standard ICAO phraseology , best thing so far.

Last thing : for info , in CDG, it is not the controllers that object to English only ( most would prefer that ) but it is Air France Pilots unions...but with AF current situation, the problem might solve itself .. ( bad joke unfortunately )
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 08:16
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well said ATC Watcher.
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2012, 08:21
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: by the seaside
Age: 74
Posts: 559
Received 17 Likes on 13 Posts
In 1976 BEA lost a Trident in a collision over Zagreb which could have probably avoided if English had been used.
We haven't come far since then especially in the south of France where I have painfully listened to a couple of approach controllers who had difficulty in understanding Korean, French, American, Scandinavian and Irish pilots communications in English.
I worked for a Swiss German company - Switzerland has four official languages and we did everything in english except cabin crew briefings.
It worked well except for some of the militia pilots whose english was on a par with the French - inadequate but as their mates tested them they got through the system.
One language - anything else is pure stupidity.
blind pew is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.