UA Flight suffers tyre blow-out
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2012
Location: London, UK
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
UA Flight suffers tyre blow-out
CNN reports a UA flight returned to Newark Libety Intl after a tyre blow-out on take-off and was ingested into an engine causing a fire.
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Rockytop, Tennessee, USA
Posts: 5,898
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
Flight returning to Newark after engine problem
From Susan Candiotti, CNN National Correspondent
updated 7:25 PM EDT, Sat August 18, 2012
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: Witnesses report fire in engine
United flight was taking off for Berlin
FBI: Piece of tire flew into Boeing 757 engine
New York (CNN) -- A United Airlines flight was returning Saturday evening to Newark Liberty International Airport after a tire blew during takeoff and flew into an engine, FBI spokeswoman Barbara Woodruff said.
Flight 96, a Boeing 757, reported a problem in its left engine after it left New Jersey for Berlin, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Kathleen Bergen.
The engine was operating properly and the plane was burning fuel before landing, according to the FAA.
Eyewitness Keisha Thomas, who was traveling on the New Jersey Turnpike, said she witnessed fireballs near a wing at about 6:25 p.m.
Thomas heard a loud sound, describing it as "pow, pow, pow." The plane was circling the airport, she said.
Djenaba Johnson-Jones, who lives near the airport, said she heard an unusual noise and saw fire, but not smoke, coming from the aircraft's left engine.
Eyewitness Dennis Ostolaza said he heard a "propeller sound" akin to a military helicopter as the airliner gained altitude after takeoff, with "black smoke and fire spitting out of the engine."
From Susan Candiotti, CNN National Correspondent
updated 7:25 PM EDT, Sat August 18, 2012
STORY HIGHLIGHTS
NEW: Witnesses report fire in engine
United flight was taking off for Berlin
FBI: Piece of tire flew into Boeing 757 engine
New York (CNN) -- A United Airlines flight was returning Saturday evening to Newark Liberty International Airport after a tire blew during takeoff and flew into an engine, FBI spokeswoman Barbara Woodruff said.
Flight 96, a Boeing 757, reported a problem in its left engine after it left New Jersey for Berlin, said Federal Aviation Administration spokeswoman Kathleen Bergen.
The engine was operating properly and the plane was burning fuel before landing, according to the FAA.
Eyewitness Keisha Thomas, who was traveling on the New Jersey Turnpike, said she witnessed fireballs near a wing at about 6:25 p.m.
Thomas heard a loud sound, describing it as "pow, pow, pow." The plane was circling the airport, she said.
Djenaba Johnson-Jones, who lives near the airport, said she heard an unusual noise and saw fire, but not smoke, coming from the aircraft's left engine.
Eyewitness Dennis Ostolaza said he heard a "propeller sound" akin to a military helicopter as the airliner gained altitude after takeoff, with "black smoke and fire spitting out of the engine."
Looks like they are holding to burn off fuel:
FlightAware
Landed safely... crew was able to restart affected engine.
I'll be interested to find out if this was a main gear tire, and the explosive force was enough to put rubber shrapnel ahead of the engine intakes...
Or sent rubber up the tailpipe...
or if it was a nosegear failure.
I'll be interested to find out if this was a main gear tire, and the explosive force was enough to put rubber shrapnel ahead of the engine intakes...
Or sent rubber up the tailpipe...
or if it was a nosegear failure.
Last edited by pattern_is_full; 19th Aug 2012 at 02:27.
Not unheard of for a main gear tyre to shed pieces forward, aft, upwards, some of which bounce around and may be ingested into an engine causing fan damage similar to a bird strike.
Again not at all unusual for a damaged engine to emit pops, flame spurts and then smoke out a tailpipe. Pilot shuts down affected engine, and makes an airturnback as expected.
No comparison with the Concord event on several areas.
fodder for spectators corner
Again not at all unusual for a damaged engine to emit pops, flame spurts and then smoke out a tailpipe. Pilot shuts down affected engine, and makes an airturnback as expected.
No comparison with the Concord event on several areas.
fodder for spectators corner
It is possible for a main gear tyre to shed tread which may enter an engine intake. This may or may not cause an engine surge which may or may not auto-recover.
It is also possible for tread to enter the intake and damage fan blades and for the crew to have no indication of fan damage until after arrival at destination.
It is also possible for tread to enter the intake and damage fan blades and for the crew to have no indication of fan damage until after arrival at destination.
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: fort sheridan, il
Posts: 1,656
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did it occur to anyone that the tire ingested into the engine was from another plane? while I suppose a nose tire might find its way into the engines of a 757, a main gear tire is much less likely to do so.
On the DC9 we did worry about a blown tire getting ingested into an engine...for obvious reasons...but a 757?
On the DC9 we did worry about a blown tire getting ingested into an engine...for obvious reasons...but a 757?
a main gear tire is much less likely to do so.
The weather at Frankfurt was windy. The engines were windmilling. No one noticed -except for an alert ground engineer - that there was an odd shadow rotating with the fan. He stopped it rotating and, to cut a long boring story short, we were just outside vibration limits to go. Sorry guys.
In the past, I've had a bit of a go at Frankfurt but this ground engineer was the only one of FE, pilot, Gnd Eng who noticed the damage.
Last edited by Basil; 19th Aug 2012 at 20:38.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Isn't restarting an engine after suspected foreign object ingestion a bad idea?
Presonally, I have never crossed the pond in a narrow body and I'm intending not to in the future, even if there are probably no statistics to back this up.
Presonally, I have never crossed the pond in a narrow body and I'm intending not to in the future, even if there are probably no statistics to back this up.
Isn't restarting an engine after suspected foreign object ingestion a bad idea?
Unfortunately, the vib was just outside limits so we couldn't operate. Don't think we had anything perishable on board.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: MI
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Isn't restarting an engine after suspected foreign object ingestion a bad idea?
Presonally, I have never crossed the pond in a narrow body and I'm intending not to in the future, even if there are probably no statistics to back this up.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NC, USA
Age: 80
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did it occur to anyone that the tire ingested into the engine was from another plane? while I suppose a nose tire might find its way into the engines of a 757, a main gear tire is much less likely to do so.
On the DC9 we did worry about a blown tire getting ingested into an engine...for obvious reasons...but a 757?
On the DC9 we did worry about a blown tire getting ingested into an engine...for obvious reasons...but a 757?
did it occur to anyone that the tire ingested into the engine was from another plane? while I suppose a nose tire might find its way into the engines of a 757, a main gear tire is much less likely to do so.
I always chocked (sic) this up to clean runway sweeps following a tyre failure
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kashi
Age: 34
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
BRE
*
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 67
Isn't restarting an engine after suspected foreign object ingestion a bad idea?
*
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 67
Isn't restarting an engine after suspected foreign object ingestion a bad idea?
If they were over the oceans on ETOPS or over high terrain, then I reckoned it would be prudent to attempt restarts on the afflicted engine.
Anyway, a good outome...the crew did a great job!
...are we not making a stretch assumption that they actually restarted the engine ?
The source for the burst tire is the FBI.
Given the relative aviation expertise of those two agencies, we should probably question the burst tire as a more suspect assumption than the engine restart.
Anyway, you can read the AvHerald report and place your bets accordingly....
Incident: United B752 at Newark on Aug 18th 2012, blew tyre on takeoff, both engines "red"
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kashi
Age: 34
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pattern_is_full, thank you for the link to Aviation Herald. I apologise for my earlier misgivings about the crew restarting the afflicted engine. I now realise why they had good reasons to do so. Top marks to the crew for a superb job done. Bravo!