Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

A Sukhoi superjet 100 is missing

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

A Sukhoi superjet 100 is missing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 11:11
  #541 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: HereAndNow
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Technology ?Is Key? to Better Communications, Safer Skies | The Jakarta Globe
Antek22QR is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 13:22
  #542 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is a fascinating article.
aterpster is offline  
Old 3rd Jun 2012, 15:22
  #543 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Itinerant
Posts: 828
Received 77 Likes on 13 Posts
aterpster

Agreed -- The frequency congestion in Jakarta (especially CGK itself) is a significant matter. The absence of enforcement of frequency allocation and interference problems is a HUGE issue in Indonesia, directly related to a less than diligent regulator beset with corruption.

Last edited by grizzled; 3rd Jun 2012 at 15:24.
grizzled is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 05:31
  #544 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Manchester MAN
Posts: 6,643
Received 74 Likes on 46 Posts
grizzled,

Are you saying that commercial FM stations or other radio users are using frequencies in the Aeronautical VHF spectrum?
India Four Two is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 08:00
  #545 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: south east UK
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
maybe not intentionally, but poorly maintained / amateur / unlicensed transmitters can and do have sideband transmissions at different frequencies which could easily be transmitting in the aviation frequency spectrum. Without proper policing of the airwaves then this quickly becomes a real problem.
757_Driver is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 09:48
  #546 (permalink)  
Pegase Driver
 
Join Date: May 1997
Location: Europe
Age: 74
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not restricted to Indonesia. There was a well know belgian FM radio station who poisoined R/T around Brussels for years. The difficult part was identifying it . Then it took legal action and many years to fix it (force them to buy a protected better quality transmitter ) Not easy. Big money is at stake normally.
ATC Watcher is offline  
Old 5th Jun 2012, 17:30
  #547 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: minneapolis
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flying in Delhi a few years back we used to hear commercial radio over approach freq
seifly is offline  
Old 7th Jun 2012, 18:30
  #548 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: By one of the seven wonders of the world
Age: 90
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest "rumors" from Latvia and Russia...

Apollo - Zi

The Google translate for Latvian is pretty sorry, I will try to improve...

Nevertheless the human factor is to blame for the Superjet 100 crash says Russian media.
A source, close to the investigation told journalists the following: Pilot conversations [CVR] reveal that the a/c captain accomplished a „deadly maneuver”, bragging about the aircraft's capabilities. Specialists in Russian media have called this "aerial hooliganism".
In the transcripts you not only hear the warning, that the aircraft is nearing an object, but also a member of the crew trying to talk the captain out of performing risky maneuvers.
The source contends, that in the transcripts the other pilot is yelling approximately this phrase: Commander we are not allowed there, thre is a mountain.
The source also said, that the transcripts revealed that the fateful maneuver, which the pilot was not allowed to perform, was not the first during this flight.
Though temporarily/still we do not have official confirmation about this information, neither from Russian or Indonesian investigators.
Phoeniks is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2012, 03:34
  #549 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin, Texas, USA
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unconfirmed CVR information

An airborne version of the Costa Concordia disaster?
JimNtexas is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2012, 04:05
  #550 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Slaving away in front of multiple LCDs, somewhere in the USA
Age: 69
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An airborne version of the Costa Concordia disaster?
Maybe with a little of this thrown-in, the irony of the callsign notwithstanding...

SeniorDispatcher is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2012, 15:00
  #551 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...Commander we are not allowed there, thre is a mountain...
In russian:
...командир, нам туда нельзя, там гора!
I dont trust this information too much. I have read that "source" claimed that warning was said by "navigator"
по словам источника, это был штурман
and SSJ is two crew member plane...

Full text abou hooliganism:

Как рассказал специалист ЦАГИ, вместе с коллегами из ЛИИ им. Громова они на основании представленных им данных неоднократно моделировали последний полет SSJ-100 и пришли к выводу: до столкновения самолет в столь же опасном сближении уже дважды облетал похожие горы, но третью обойти не смог — врезался. Как выразился эксперт: «Я с самого начала понимал, что ошибку экипажа отмести будет сложно, но то, что здесь может иметь место элемент воздушного хулиганства, — такого предположить не мог!»
Expert CAGI said that together with colleagues from the LII they simulated last flight SSJ and find out that before crash the plane twice flew around the mountain in dangerous distance and in third round crashed. Expert claimed: From the beginning I understood that to rule out the crew error will be complicated, but that in this case may take a place a element of air hooliganism - I could not imagine!"

Last edited by Karel_x; 8th Jun 2012 at 15:04.
Karel_x is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2012, 15:42
  #552 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: us
Age: 63
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a google-translated article which quotes an "industry source"

Google Translate

who says it appears the pilots were convinced they were over a flat area and ignored taws warnings. There was a secondary too low gear warning

The media reports of a crew member warning of a mountain ahead are speculative and incorrect he said

There may have been a gap in communications with tower due to terrain
vovachan is offline  
Old 8th Jun 2012, 20:11
  #553 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A gear warning makes me wonder about their airspeed.

Most gear warnings (TAWS or other) take into account thrust lever position or airspeed to only give warnings when thrust or airspeed is low, in the landing realm.

If they were slow enough to get gear warnings perhaps they didn't have the speed or power to climb safely above terrain once they spotted it?
GroundProxGuy is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 00:25
  #554 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: SBA
Age: 56
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is earlier reference to a Navigator in the first few pages of this thread. It discusses the fact that the same Navigator was on both demo flights.

Even though the plane is 2-crew there may have been additional people on the flight deck.

Last edited by Khashoggi; 9th Jun 2012 at 00:26.
Khashoggi is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 00:49
  #555 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: New Zealand
Age: 67
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Could the first 3 or 4 secs of this Sukhoi clip be considered 'aerial hooliganism ?
Sebagian Kotak Hitam Ditemukan - Antara News Video
WanganuiLad is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 01:14
  #556 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Uh, no, don't think so...
stepwilk is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 07:58
  #557 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is earlier reference to a Navigator in the first few pages of this thread. It discusses the fact that the same Navigator was on both demo flights.
Even though the plane is 2-crew there may have been additional people on the flight deck.
There already was a third person in the cocpit - a potential customer. Reportedly he dont disturb the pilots, only from time to time he asked some question, about consumption of fuel etc. No wishes for risky maneuver or sightseeing. Hypothetical navigator shoul be a forth person in little cocpit.

adding:

There was the navigator aboard - Oleg Shvecov

Last edited by Karel_x; 9th Jun 2012 at 09:54.
Karel_x is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 09:12
  #558 (permalink)  
Per Ardua ad Astraeus
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 18,579
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Back in the 'old days' when I used to chase the pesky Reds around the airspace the 'Political Advisor' on aboard (presumably there to report on any non-acceptable politics) was always referred to as a 'navigator'.
BOAC is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 10:45
  #559 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Czech Republic
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There was a customer sitting in the cockpit...

Karel_x is offline  
Old 9th Jun 2012, 12:18
  #560 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they WERE trying to sell the plane

tough to do if everyone is locked in like the SLC on BA
Heathrow Harry is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.