Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

AMC Airlines 737-800 Paris CDG Aug. 16 2008

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

AMC Airlines 737-800 Paris CDG Aug. 16 2008

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Sep 2011, 13:44
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AMC Airlines 737-800 Paris CDG Aug. 16 2008

Take-off calculation error led 737 to overrun short runway
By David Kaminski-Morrow

DATE:05/09/11
SOURCE:Flight International

French investigators have deter-mined that an Egyptian Boeing 737-800 crew failed to account for a shortened runway during take-off at Paris, colliding with obstacles on rotation and flying low over a blast fence.

Despite damage to the twinjet, the AMC Airlines crew did not report the collision to air traffic control and continued the flight to Luxor. The incident was only discovered when a taxiing aircraft reported debris on the runway three hours later, and several days passed before the 737 involved was formally identified.

French investigation agency Bureau d'Enquêtes et d'Analyses (BEA) said the 737 was cleared to take off on Runway 27L from taxiway Y11. Construction work meant the last 1,240m (4,070ft) of 27L was closed, and the intersection take-off cut a further 280m from the available distance.

Communication difficulties with Egyptian authorities meant the flight-data recorder had been overwritten before analysis of the 16 August 2008 incident.

Paris air traffic control told the crew that 2,360m of runway remained. But radar data indicated the 737 became airborne after 2,520m - some 160m beyond the provisional runway end - and investigators found damaged marker blocks and crushed lights where the work zone began.

AMC staff found the 737 had sustained minor engine cowl, stabiliser and landing-gear damage.

The carrier's pilots used Boeing OPT software, on laptops, to determine characteristic take-off speeds. BEA found that "failure to take into account the runway restriction" while using OPT explained the event.

It has recommended the European Aviation Safety Agency to study standards for certification of such onboard calculation systems to ensure ergonomics and procedures are "compatible with the requirements of safety".



BEA LINK:

http://www.bea.aero/docspa/2008/su-z080816.en/pdf/su-z080816.en.pdf
airman1900 is offline  
Old 5th Sep 2011, 17:44
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: in the magical land of beer and chocolates
Age: 52
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Probably looked a bit like this one
kbrockman is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 09:04
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 384
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks for the video!
Shaman is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 13:00
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas, like a whole other country
Posts: 444
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
China Airlines appears to be very fortunate there were no obstacles near the end of the runway! Way too much pucker factor in any case.
Carbon Bootprint is offline  
Old 7th Sep 2011, 13:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Maastricht, Netherlands
Age: 61
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty sure somebody required a change of underwear there....
PH-SCP is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.