US Airways Captain Escorted from Aircraft
Thread Starter
US Airways Captain Escorted from Aircraft
.
On June 16, captain Valerie Wells, a 30-year-pilot, was scheduled to fly an Airbus A330, which can carry nearly 300 passengers, on a flight from Philadelphia to Rome. But she declined to fly because of failures of both the auxiliary power unit, a backup source of electrical power, and the "hot battery bus," a primary source of electrical power.
After the crew and passengers had returned to the gate Wells, in a particularly unusual event, was escorted out of the airport by security officials. Subsequently, a second crew of three pilots also declined to fly; the aircraft was repaired and underwent a rigorous inspection, and a third crew took off about six to seven hours late.
In seeking to publicize the incident, the U.S. Airline Pilots Association took out a full-page advertisement in Friday's edition of USA Today. The ad proclaimed that US Airways put "revenues first, safety second.
"The intimidation of flight crews is becoming commonplace at US Airways, [which] works to maximize their revenues by pushing their employees to move their airplanes regardless of the potential human cost," said the text. The ad referred readers to a website www.USAirlinePilots.org/SafetyFirst.
In a letter to employees on Friday, Robert Isom, chief operating officer, wrote that "USAPA has embarked upon a smear campaign that in reality is all about contract negotiations, not safety.
"I can tell you unequivocally the union's claims are outlandish, false and a disservice to the 32,000 hard-working employees of US Airways," Isom wrote. "Safety has been and always will be the top priority at US Airways, as it is at any airline."
More
On June 16, captain Valerie Wells, a 30-year-pilot, was scheduled to fly an Airbus A330, which can carry nearly 300 passengers, on a flight from Philadelphia to Rome. But she declined to fly because of failures of both the auxiliary power unit, a backup source of electrical power, and the "hot battery bus," a primary source of electrical power.
After the crew and passengers had returned to the gate Wells, in a particularly unusual event, was escorted out of the airport by security officials. Subsequently, a second crew of three pilots also declined to fly; the aircraft was repaired and underwent a rigorous inspection, and a third crew took off about six to seven hours late.
In seeking to publicize the incident, the U.S. Airline Pilots Association took out a full-page advertisement in Friday's edition of USA Today. The ad proclaimed that US Airways put "revenues first, safety second.
"The intimidation of flight crews is becoming commonplace at US Airways, [which] works to maximize their revenues by pushing their employees to move their airplanes regardless of the potential human cost," said the text. The ad referred readers to a website www.USAirlinePilots.org/SafetyFirst.
In a letter to employees on Friday, Robert Isom, chief operating officer, wrote that "USAPA has embarked upon a smear campaign that in reality is all about contract negotiations, not safety.
"I can tell you unequivocally the union's claims are outlandish, false and a disservice to the 32,000 hard-working employees of US Airways," Isom wrote. "Safety has been and always will be the top priority at US Airways, as it is at any airline."
More
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Too soon to know what happened, but even non-APU they could have dispatched via southern Greenland, the Hot Bus may have been a battery issue which could have been a quick fix. Don't want to say anything more than the following, but I heard the "escorting" was more related to words being used over the PA and when talking to Dx and Mx than anything else.
Did the MEL allow her to dispatch or not? It's a very simple question.
The operator may not agree but that's another matter.
I imagine these crew members might have a case against the Company for harassment/bullying?
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: uk
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
From a UK company Boeing MEL:
9. The MEL does not anticipate the effects of combinations of apparently unrelated unserviceabilities or allow for situations where systems are made inoperative for special purposes such as demonstration, test or crew training. Other provisions may apply to positioning of ferrying flights but these may not necessarily be included in the MEL.
10. The decision to operate the aircraft with multiple unserviceabilities should only be made after due consideration of possible inter-related or additive effects
9. The MEL does not anticipate the effects of combinations of apparently unrelated unserviceabilities or allow for situations where systems are made inoperative for special purposes such as demonstration, test or crew training. Other provisions may apply to positioning of ferrying flights but these may not necessarily be included in the MEL.
10. The decision to operate the aircraft with multiple unserviceabilities should only be made after due consideration of possible inter-related or additive effects
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Goodwood, Sussex, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Question from a rotary-wing driver so patience please from the airline jocks: Don't MEL's detail possible combinations? And .. aren't MEL's required to be endorsed by the manufacturer?
If so, and given that MEL's are approved by the relevant aviation authority, then divinehover's statement:
would seem to be logical.
If so, and given that MEL's are approved by the relevant aviation authority, then divinehover's statement:
Did the MEL allow her to dispatch or not? It's a very simple question.
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Now at Home
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
guess as an ETOPS flight, for shure a no go with APU inop. Well done lady Cpt.
And concerning Airbus MEL, it will allow you to fly the beast at anytime. Well almost anytime, maybe if one wing is missing or so
NO DISPATCH is very, very rare in Airbus MEL.
So a good Captains decision is always needed to go or not to go.
TWO (heavy) electrical issues is one too much in this case and on this flight. IMHO.
And concerning Airbus MEL, it will allow you to fly the beast at anytime. Well almost anytime, maybe if one wing is missing or so
NO DISPATCH is very, very rare in Airbus MEL.
So a good Captains decision is always needed to go or not to go.
TWO (heavy) electrical issues is one too much in this case and on this flight. IMHO.
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: I wouldn't know.
Posts: 4,497
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@Earl, as quoted above MELs do not take into consideration combination of different defects. It is only a per singular defect consideration. Therefore the final authority lays with the commander of the flight. Sometimes a combination of malfunctions can have some very very weird follow up reactions.
To contain all possible combinations of malfunctions would be very difficult, not to mention the MEL would suddenly turn into a 100 part manual.
To contain all possible combinations of malfunctions would be very difficult, not to mention the MEL would suddenly turn into a 100 part manual.
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Goodwood, Sussex, UK
Age: 70
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Denti, thanks.
Meaning therefore that devinehover's statement was a paradox in that it is not possible for a MEL to sanction the dispatch of an aircraft with multiple (or combination) items inoperative as MEL's only address the omission of a single item?
Meaning therefore that devinehover's statement was a paradox in that it is not possible for a MEL to sanction the dispatch of an aircraft with multiple (or combination) items inoperative as MEL's only address the omission of a single item?
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: @ home
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you want to marry me, Valerie?
MEL is written by lawers, whilst airmanship is the "common sense on the air" whe should all have.
Unfortunattely there are also some pilots that are so company-minded that tend to forget that safety comes first.
Well done, Valerie! And well done second crew
MEL is written by lawers, whilst airmanship is the "common sense on the air" whe should all have.
Unfortunattely there are also some pilots that are so company-minded that tend to forget that safety comes first.
Well done, Valerie! And well done second crew
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: schermoney and left front seat
Age: 57
Posts: 2,438
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wells, in a particularly unusual event, was escorted out of the airport by security officials.
Why is a captain escorted out of the airport when he/she refuses to fly with good reason (IMO) aka does what a captain should do???? What about the rest of the crew? How desperate is a company when it puts such stress and pressure on crews to fly aircraft with tech issues? What does it say about safety culture?
I´m just a lowlife executive pilot and got brushed by the 'airliners' as the risky dudes etc. when something happened in my field of aviation and its safety culture is apparently bad, now I can see thats that no different at the airlines...
I sure hope that the FAA fines US Airways real hard for such a behavior.
Cudos to the captain, crew and the second crew as well.
BTW it was:
n this case, she was met by US Airways Corporate Security and escorted out of the airport!
Last edited by His dudeness; 24th Jul 2011 at 10:10.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You beat me to it His Dudeness, what the hell have airport security got to do with this?
I can't think of any other security "officials" at an airport unless they're talking about the police, but then why not say so!
I think my response would be to tell 'em to clear off.
I can't think of any other security "officials" at an airport unless they're talking about the police, but then why not say so!
I think my response would be to tell 'em to clear off.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Sunny side of Alps
Age: 51
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How typical is it for a 30 year old to be a wide body captain in the USA?
EDIT: As originally it is written 30-year-pilot, intended meaning might be the same, however it sounds a bit awkward ...
The Reverend
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With the need to know technology training these days, the more reason to carry a professional flight engineer with an inside knowledge and training of the airplane systems, rather than a second officer in flight scribe for about 4 years who knows nothing about the in depth systems that are down stream of the on off switch!
Presumably, Hot Dog, that would include the FE who, in spite of being advised by me that the Bev fire system was ACTIVE, even with the Battery Master switch OFF, insisted on proving his superior knowledge by pressing a fire switch ... action closely followed by dull thump and drip, drip, drip!!
Note, FEs were NOT original crew complement but and add-on to improve safety!! No doubt there are/were some very competent people out there but, like all varieties of crew member, not all!
Used to have this sort of 'conversation' re. the relative merits of the 747-400 v the Classic crewing. Never did find, or hear of, an FE who would/could monitor systems as many times per SECOND as the 400's system did.
Now retires to avoid incoming
Note, FEs were NOT original crew complement but and add-on to improve safety!! No doubt there are/were some very competent people out there but, like all varieties of crew member, not all!
Used to have this sort of 'conversation' re. the relative merits of the 747-400 v the Classic crewing. Never did find, or hear of, an FE who would/could monitor systems as many times per SECOND as the 400's system did.
Now retires to avoid incoming
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: A tropical island.
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Your example is without merit since I've never found a pilot who could make as many minute corrections to an ILS approach as the A/P does.
More brains and more knowledge are always better than more computers.
More brains and more knowledge are always better than more computers.
