Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Delta planes collide at Logan

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Delta planes collide at Logan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jul 2011, 20:37
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CFE
Age: 65
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not JFK, but maybe the Bostonian accent!
valvanuz is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 20:55
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: world
Posts: 3,424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So where are all the cries of poor airmanship and judgement by the DELTA B767 Captain (it was his side)? Is that only reserved for foreign crews?
Hotel Tango is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 21:04
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Spain
Age: 82
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I love the difference between the media report and the official statement. The media considered it a 'collision' and a 'crash' whereas the official report stated 'came into contact with'.

Shades of 'rocket' for going up and 'plummet' for coming down!
Sunnyjohn is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 21:08
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: MA
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The NTSB is involved, and the CVRs and FDRs from both planes have been pulled according to a local Boston TV news report just aired. I hope that neither crew was talking about extraneous subjects.
RobertS975 is offline  
Old 15th Jul 2011, 23:10
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NNW of Antipodes
Age: 81
Posts: 1,330
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
NTSB Media Release
The National Transportation Safety Board has opened an investigation into last night's collision of two jetliners on a taxiway at Boston Logan Airport.

On July 14, 2011, about 7:33 P.M. EDT, a Delta Air Lines B767-300ER, N185DN, operating as Delta flight 266, was taxiing on taxiway B for departure on runway 04 at Boston Logan International Airport (BOS), when its left winglet struck the horizontal stabilizer of an Atlantic Southeast Airlines CRJ900, N132EV, operating as ASA flight 4904, which was number three in line on taxiway M waiting for departure on runway 09.

As the B767 approached and passed the intersection with taxiway M, the left winglet of the B767 struck the horizontal tail of the CRJ900. The CRJ900 sustained substantial damage, which included damage to the horizontal tail and vertical tail; the airplane lost fluid in all three hydraulic systems. Parts of the B767 winglet were sheared off and embedded in the tail of the CRJ900. The passengers on the CRJ900 were deplaned on the taxiway, and the B767 taxied back to the terminal.

Flight data recorders from both airplanes are en route to NTSB headquarters. Air Safety Investigator Dan Bower is the Investigator-In-Charge. Parties to the investigation include Delta Air Lines, Atlantic Southeast Airlines, the Federal Aviation Administration, and the Air Line Pilots Association.
mm43 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 00:18
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East of Texas
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another captain's side wingtip mishap. I wonder if that data is out there - which wing hits more often? I know the numbers are out there that more landing incidents occur on captains landings, I wonder if statistics are kept for things like this?
Rapid D is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 07:29
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: UK
Age: 83
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well, that's hardly surprising. A lot of aircraft only have nose wheel steering fitted on the left side so it is impossible for the first officer to taxi the aircraft.
JW411 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 14:35
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: us
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Update on what happened, including that about the time the metal crumpled, a US Air flight had declared an emergency with possible hydraulic problems and was needing to land on the runway the 767 intended to use.

From photos of the RJ's VS, it was not a gentle touch.

Federal investigators give Logan crash highest priority - The Boston Globe
SaturnV is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 14:55
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: UK
Age: 51
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm surprised it doesn't happen more often. Even in a smaller airport such as the one that I work at, if the pilot is unfamiliar or we are in LVPs, then there is a good chance they'll take a wrong turn or mishear GMC. I've heard it a fair few times, where someone's gone down the wrong link, or to the wrong holding point.
In fact a few weeks ago I had to assist a 738 from a certain budget airline that had gone down the wrong cul-de-sac and got stuck. I helped him turn around and get back out on the taxiway to head in the right direction. No damage was done as it was quiet but it happens quite a lot.
pixiemixer is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 15:30
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The news article quotes:

“From the cockpit, it’s almost impossible to see your own wingtip,’’ said Greg Reinhardt, a veteran commercial airline pilot with 41 years of flying experience, including six years in 767s for United Airlines. The wings start at the middle of the aircraft, well back behind you’’ and are difficult to see because of the curvature of the airplane’s cockpit, he said.
Would it really matter much if you could see your wingtip or not at those distances and with perspective distortions etc. factored in? Isn't it all based mostly on following the center-line and hoping that the designers got their calculations correct?

Former United pilot Bob Rossi, who has flown many wide-body jets, including the 767, said aircraft are not supposed to stop on taxiways without authorization, referring to the report that the smaller plane halted abruptly.
Are taxi clearances issued where there is a chance of a conflict with a different taxiway were a second aircraft on the second taxiway? Or are all taxiways designed to be interference-free of other taxiway aircraft except at intersections?
ross_M is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 16:23
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Fife, Scotland
Age: 78
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a non-flyer, I commented on another such incident by asking why there were not video cameras on the wingtips which could be viewed on the main digital screens whilst taxying.
I got shot down but without giving any technical reasons why this was not feasible.
Any comments here? (Not trolling, just interested).

Last edited by A A Gruntpuddock; 16th Jul 2011 at 16:57.
A A Gruntpuddock is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 16:26
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: France
Posts: 2,315
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once upon a time, we had 'gendarmes' with white sticks and a whistle for 'traffic control' on all major town cross-sections. Now we have traffic lights (not always better, in case anybody wants to make that point).

We have autopilots, we have automatic landing, we have TCAS. Isn't it about time, that airport ground movement control made it out of the stone age as well?

Or do we need another Tenerife to wake up everybody?
ChristiaanJ is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 16:49
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: formally Cyprus, now UK
Posts: 351
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Delta had better order a load of spare tails for their CRJ's because at the rate that everyne's bashing into them they're gonna run out of CRJ's soon !
cyflyer is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 18:11
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: -
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Once upon a time, we had 'gendarmes' with white sticks and a whistle for 'traffic control' on all major town cross-sections. Now we have traffic lights (not always better, in case anybody wants to make that point).

We have autopilots, we have automatic landing, we have TCAS. Isn't it about time, that airport ground movement control made it out of the stone age as well?

Or do we need another Tenerife to wake up everybody?
Autopilot will not drive anytime soon, because driving is more difficult to automate than flying.
But anyway, there are lots of gadgets to regulate road traffic and avoid accidents:



I really don't understand why all this is not used on aircraft and in airports. What is so difficult about installing traffic lights at hot spots, to be activated by ground controller? Traffic lights or even bars, as on the second picture, at the entrance to the runway? Parking sensors or cameras on wingtips? I'm sure a couple of these would be much much cheaper than having to repair the CRJ's tail...
ap08 is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 18:31
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autopilot will not drive anytime soon, because driving is more difficult to automate than flying.
Wrong.

Google car that drives itself
ross_M is offline  
Old 16th Jul 2011, 18:47
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: -
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Autopilot will not drive anytime soon, because driving is more difficult to automate than flying.
Correct. The following quote is from the above link about Google car. It says literally what I wrote:
“It’s really just a science project … pushing the boundaries of what’s possible. It’s clearly not something that’s going to make us money any time soon.”
ap08 is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 00:42
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East of Texas
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, that's hardly surprising. A lot of aircraft only have nose wheel steering fitted on the left side so it is impossible for the first officer to taxi the aircraft.
Huh? My point was that in my opinion most ground taxi/wingtip incidents involve the left wing of the aircraft that hit something. How is this "hardly surprising"? Captain is taxiing from the left always - at least in U.S. - yet they don't often hit things with the right wing. Why is that? I'm an FO, and I look out and tell the captain when we look good, and now and then I suggest we stop because it doesn't look good. But when it is close on the left side, I can't see. Just have to trust we really have clearance. And lately in JFK and BOS there wasn't

I don't get what you mean but I'm not real smart either
Rapid D is offline  
Old 17th Jul 2011, 01:21
  #38 (permalink)  
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Former United pilot Bob Rossi, who has flown many wide-body jets, including the 767, said aircraft are not supposed to stop on taxiways without authorization, referring to the report that the smaller plane halted abruptly.
What a bunch of unmitigated Bull S**T.

You just have to love these retarded ex-captains who become television experts. What Captain Rossi's utterances prove that he managed to get through a career with Untidy Airlines without fate catching up with his lack of knowledge.
aterpster is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2011, 00:31
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East of Texas
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks IGh.

Off the subject I know, but what do you think the data says about landing incidents - CA or FO landings more often?
Rapid D is offline  
Old 18th Jul 2011, 01:09
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Beijing
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
gees,in aviation terminology,the official statement is more professional.
hyzhao11 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.