Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Tu 134 crashed in Russia

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Tu 134 crashed in Russia

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: not a million miles from old BKK
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looking at Google Earth and a Reuters photo of the crash scene (the one with the Airport direction road sign) it would seem possible that they'd lined up with the airport access road which runs roughly parallel to runway 02 but about 400 metres right of it. The airport road is a residential area (houses on the right side of the road) so it will probably have good street lighting. Might explain why they had descended below minimums thinking they had the runway in sight.
Xeque is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:36
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rough translation from the Lenta.ru website:

According to the chairman of the Committee on the livelihoods and safety of the population of Karelia Nikolai Fedotov, the airplane during landing in difficult weather conditions deviated to the right of the runway at 150-200 meters.

The crew tried to correct the aircraft at an altitude of about 110 meters after the air traffic controller told the crew to perform a go-around, but during the maneuver it hit power lines along the road, which caused the runway lights to go out for some five seconds.

When emergency lighting came on, the plane had already touched the tops of the forest and crashed on a highway. Link

Also, it appears onboard were at least three high-ranking directors of a Russian nuclear power company, on their way to a conference in Petrozavodsk.
Link
snowfalcon2 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:41
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Age: 79
Posts: 8,268
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Down to a few hundred feet on an NDB in atrocious weather sounds highly dangerous.

As for lining up on the nearby road.... saw it happen at Heathrow a few times with the A4 versus 27R.. and that's with Cat III ILS and a full scale lighting system.
HEATHROW DIRECTOR is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 09:52
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London UK
Posts: 7,651
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 15 Posts
Having been to Petrozavodsk I can say that there is very little good quality road lighting outside the city centre, as can be seen in some of the photographs here the timber roadside poles appear to only be a 3-phase power transmission line, which may be the airport supply. Given that it was not dark, but foggy at the time, I too initially wondered whether they had mistaken a road alignment for the parallel runway, but can't see a candidate for this.


Google Maps
WHBM is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 10:03
  #25 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Power lines seems is quite undamaged on the Reuter's photos.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 12:02
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: India
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The airliner took off from Moscow at 22:30 on Monday, made a hard landing on the highway about a kilometer from Petrozaavodska writes "Gazeta.ru".
ooking at Google Earth and a Reuters photo of the crash scene (the one with the Airport direction road sign) it would seem possible that they'd lined up with the airport access road which runs roughly parallel to runway 02 but about 400 metres right of it. The airport road is a residential area (houses on the right side of the road) so it will probably have good street lighting. Might explain why they had descended below minimums thinking they had the runway in sight.
Considering the deteriorating weather, a "lit" road may have been erroneously mistaken for runway - could it not be a classical Orientation error accident: due to Type I Spatial Disorientation?
PS: Considering the map, posted by Kulverstukas, I have taken the liberty to restate my point about SD? Thank you for the map, Kulverstukas.

Last edited by AvMed.IN; 21st Jun 2011 at 12:18.
AvMed.IN is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 12:04
  #27 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Kulverstukas might help.

There was a map, just saw it 5 min ago, and it is gone :o(
Did you mean this one?

a "lit" road parallel to the runway
There is NO lit road parallel to the runway look at the map (link in the WHBM post).



Tupolev TU-134AK RA-65691 "RusAir"

Last edited by Kulverstukas; 21st Jun 2011 at 14:16.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 15:59
  #28 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UPD:

This was not sheduled flight, regular carrier on this line is RusLine but they use Bombardier CRJ-200 which can take only 50 paxes vs 68 of Tu134. RusAir is charter and business carrier.
Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 16:49
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,895
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
The road in question looks nothing like the runway. Colour, proportions, surroundings, markings; all different.
Fox3WheresMyBanana is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 18:30
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 15,816
Received 201 Likes on 93 Posts
Looks like the accident investigation won't be necessary:

'"I do not want to prejudge the investigation and all that but preliminary information suggests an obvious pilot error in poor weather conditions," said Russian Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov'

Words fail me.
DaveReidUK is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 19:17
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lost in EU
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...an obvious pilot error...
===================================
It is not an error, it is just discipline question!
Every one ex-soviet (and not only) pilot knows - if he descends below minimum during NDB approach trying to establish visual contact - he will get the ground by the Inner marker (inner NDB).... It had happen many-many times in the USSR (and not only) and still happens...
5 APUs captain is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 19:41
  #32 (permalink)  
dvv
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: KIAD east downwind
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Kulverstukas, the LOM (ДПРМ) is not where your map shows it is. It's, in fact, further out:

dvv is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2011, 20:39
  #33 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's not my map. It's from famous "smolensk forum" zillion-posts thread about poor Kachinsky flight.

But I can show you this: approach map from south

Kulverstukas is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2011, 07:55
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: At home
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Google Earth picture clearly shows a major electric power transmission line going in the east-to-west direction about 4.4 km (2.5 NM) south of Rwy 02. This might have been where the airplane hit - any media reports on that?

Speculation:
Interestingly, the approach chart indicates that the tower heights (pylons) are 34 metres where it crosses the chart's approach track, but rise to 60 to 74 metres further to the side of the approach track. Ahead of the power line (on the assumed actual approach track, reported to have been to the right of the correct track) there is an open field and right behind the power line is a forest. So in the murk the crew may have allowed the plane to descend too low over the field, and then not seen the pylons against the dark forest background. The higher pylons would probably rise to about double the forest height.

If they had any visual ground contact at all, that is. Not many houses or light sources there either to help the crew - only what seems to be some gardening allotments, which typically have minimal lighting and probably not even that on this rainy evening.

Anyway, according to the chart the plane should have been at a height of some 220 metres when passing that power line...
FDR will hopefully clarify.
snowfalcon2 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2011, 19:09
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Petersburg
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
And 2 people of evidence - a girl and a man, sitting in their car 200 m away from the crash site at the moment of crash - according to Komsomol Truh newspaper (popular yellow press but still) - stubbornly say they saw an orange thing like a ball in air behind them - the girl saw, told him, they turned their heads around, saw a fire in air! then bang and the plane crashed by their side.

She says she called the police at once - said "there is an airplane crashed by us, now!" and the police told them "We don't possess of such information" - and hanged up!
!!!

So they ran out and ran to the crash site, where there were bodies thrown around in plane pieces and burning alive. And dashed for a while there, between the pieces. They were joined by a man, who drove in his car from the village nearby, and he came with his 12-year old son, and a local priest also ran up there. The man with his son took command of the improvised gathering of locals, said what do you stare, look for live people - and that man and the priest actually saved 4! out of 8 who survived. And the girl and her man helped to pull he stewardess out.

Ministry of Extraordinary situation now says they will award all the 9 locals who have pulled out of the debris still 8 people alive.

Locals, interviewed by this newspaper, say there were 4 exlplosions when the plane was already burning on the ground, and they were scared to go inside the main piece of the aircraft, only pulled away those who were thrown out of the plane together with separate plane pieces, like, stuck in them, and burning alive.

The man with his son who pulled out 4 was actually treated by doctors himself after, as he's got a nervous break-down, remembers many more people to who he would come, something will blow up again - and there is no one to save anymore, and this haunts him, that there were many more who cold have been saved only there was nobody by to help him decisively.

Thank you, Kulverstukas, that is the map that I saw.
Alice025 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 09:06
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: WAW
Age: 56
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alice,
"And 2 people of evidence (...) stubbornly say they saw an orange thing like a ball in air behind them"
Bear in mind that the aircraft struck a powerline and trees before it hit the ground, it's also quite possible the engines ingested debris from trees, which could cause compressor surges, often evidenced by flames behind engine exhausts.
mikeepbc is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 11:44
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Exit stage right.
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Accident - maybe not

DEBKAfile, Political Analysis, Espionage, Terrorism, Security

Three Russian designers of Iran's nuclear plant die in plane crash
DEBKAfile Exclusive Report June 23, 2011, 12:00 PM (GMT+02:00) Tags: Iran nuclear Russia Bushehr Stuxnet

Three Russian scients who built Bushehr

The three Russian nuclear scientists who planned, designed, built and put into operation Iran's first nuclear reactor at Bushehr this year, died Tuesday night, June 20, when a Rusaero flight from Moscow to Petrozavodsk in northwest Russia crashed.
debkafile's sources reveal that they were among the 44 passengers who were killed.
racedo is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 12:27
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wythenshawe
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The veteran 134-A desecnded below MDA, substantially. Not allowed. in poor weather, a crash is the usual outcome. No conspiracy theory required.
Mr.Bloggs is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 12:30
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Age: 79
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh dear, here we go.
Another stupid conspiracy theory.
Black helicopters, Grassy Knoll, <YAWN>
The Ancient Geek is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2011, 12:38
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: St. Petersburg
Posts: 270
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May be the pair saw this, when the plane was in air. Knock knock knock on wood the stewardess will survive, she might know.

It's only, a sitting plan was published, showing where people were during landing, who survived, and the place of her is marked naturally in the beg. of the salon, not with the pilots. So she wouldn't know anyway, one would think, what was happening during the last minute.
(survivors sat everywhere in the beg as well as towards the end of the plane - but none in the very tail. no "safe" zone to be noticed)

The order of appearance of saving crew and ambulance is pathetic. First were helping people out various locals, (and one was woken up by the bang and sped in his car to the place), then - there appeared an ambulance from the town, and the last one - own airport's!!

And the guy who jumped in his car and rode to the crash side and pulled out four people from the burning debris - he phoned "his village neighbour, airport director" and told him of the crash - and then that airport director from home called the ambulances. Interesting the airport director didn't wake up from the bang in his home, and did not sped there himself.
Alice025 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.