Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Air France jet clips smaller plane at New York's JFK airport

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Air France jet clips smaller plane at New York's JFK airport

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Apr 2011, 17:42
  #381 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Those aren't mutually incompatable approaches.

It's quite possible that one final outcome of this accident will be a recommendation to JFK to change their procedures. Or their taxiways.

That does not relieve the PIC of responsibility for following and taking into account the procedures, however bad, in effect at the time and place he is operating his/her airplane. And looking out the window to see what is in the way.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2011, 17:59
  #382 (permalink)  
Plumbum Pendular
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Avionics Bay
Age: 55
Posts: 1,117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree.

It's the pic that stops the last hole in the Swiss cheese from lining up and causing an accident.
fmgc is offline  
Old 29th Apr 2011, 23:07
  #383 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: fl
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the final outcome of this investigation will be all PIC's are required to not let their wings hit anything. Ground control has a lot of stuff going on and I don't think their job is making sure the captain doesn't misjudge his wing clearance. If so we will need a lot more ground controllers with a lot more taxi data. Why is it so hard to taxi your aircraft without help for wing tip clearance? I never needed it. Of coarse that was only 23,000 hrs.
bubbers44 is offline  
Old 30th Apr 2011, 01:17
  #384 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Asia
Age: 73
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, my 2 cents worth. AF A380 pilots stuffed up; they were taxiing a really heavy plane with a huge amount of momentum at a reasonable speed for the conditions. It was a mistake any of us could have made; imho the AF and F/O skipper are going to be held responsible with the necessary penalties and a big lesson learnt. AF will probably take into account the mitigating circumstances which certainly favour a more lenient view to the error.

In the dark environment, it was difficult to make out the position of the RJ. What more with the myriad of flashing beacons from other planes and ground vehicles in the vicinity.

Have anyone operated into LAX lately during misty/foggy night hours? The plethora of flashing red and amber lights with ground vehicles darting around are sure enough to put one into a stroboscopic induced syncope. Add this to the non stop chatter on ground frequency with the F/O having to contact ramp tower on another, the overload of one's visual and aural senses together with the need to navigate the complex taxiway system due to sporadic partial closures of certain taxiways, can truly be overwhelming. I ain't a skygod, it is sure taxing for an average pilot.

Last edited by OKhalsa; 30th Apr 2011 at 01:41.
OKhalsa is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 07:18
  #385 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: 43N
Posts: 182
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Perhaps at JFK as in EWR razor thin staffing levels leads to the situation where one waits forever for everything as the rampers are busy doing something else, RJ arrivals being low on their list of priorities Hold short of the gate. "Ops we need marshalers". Minutes later some dude with uniform worn gangsta' style, hat cocked sideways, casually sashays or perhaps languidly saunters into view to show to crew and pax there is no hurry at all. Of course the FOM requires two wing walkers. "Ops, yeah we need wing walkers at gate whatever". Wait another five minutes. Maybe they have their required lighted wands, maybe not. Hopefully an A380 doesn't blast by and take your tail off. Get guided in, no jetway driver. Another call to Ops. Twenty minutes or so have passed by the time everyone deplanes...

Last edited by Koan; 6th May 2011 at 11:40.
Koan is offline  
Old 5th May 2011, 19:32
  #386 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Glass Mountains
Age: 68
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sad isn't it at the complete ****ty stuff pilots need to endure this day. Just came back form a 13 hour flight with 360 over pax with 19 wheelchair cases and docked into a gate with 2 aerobridges available and fully serviceable. Airport service staff insisted on using only one boarding bridge for disembarking and it took a good 40 over minutes for the whole process.
cheapendale is offline  
Old 15th May 2011, 11:37
  #387 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: World
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Welcome to PPruNe I would say.
d105 is offline  
Old 15th May 2011, 19:55
  #388 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Pretty far away
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I see the thread has been dusted off a bit. Good job.
Me Myself is offline  
Old 15th May 2011, 21:48
  #389 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Denver
Posts: 1,226
Received 14 Likes on 8 Posts
Agnostique, I'll give you a one-word difference between the two events - VIDEO.

The VIDEO showed a really big (nationality irrelevent) aircraft spinning around a rather small (nationality irrelevent) aircraft. That grabbed global (not just PPRuNE) attention.

Not sure - yet - how much damage was done in the 737-on-737 accident. Perhaps it should have stayed on R&N a bit longer.
pattern_is_full is offline  
Old 16th May 2011, 17:24
  #390 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SLF, living somewhere East in the West
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe Strauss-Kahn was on board the AF as well and wanted to get away fast

Couldn't resist, sorry. And I know he is assumed not guilty until proven otherwise...

Last edited by grimmrad; 16th May 2011 at 19:47.
grimmrad is offline  
Old 16th May 2011, 18:24
  #391 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: S 51 N
Age: 84
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
DSK

Guess for his wanted speedy departure even that video accelerated A 380 was moving to slow!!

But I am amazed this thread is still going.!! Thought all is said ?? Could add to my earlier post a few more reasons for the accident learned from this thread:
- A wreckless lory driver that cut off a planes travelling on the ramp
- Cramped parking and timeslots for use prevented a smooth taxy to position
- Probably - assumption - balloony, non standard, chat on ramp freq. prevented a warning in time from the RJ pilot that his tail was sticking into the safety space of TWY "A"
- A Ramp control that obviously is more involved in other tasks than safeguarding the activities in that area of responsibilty
- A "handover area" - ever heard about that at JFK ?? - Taxi/ Ramp not existing
- Probably an AF pilot trusting on the received clearance and assuming safe taxi lane
- AF crew probably distracted by other duties or the lighting situation at the place of the accident
- Razorblade thinned out (Quote) staffing in ATC

and so on and so on. I do not defer pilots responsibilties to other units or persons, but before someone should shed blame on another the conditions must fit international standards. Thats my personal opinion.
So lets look and wait what NTSB - FAA and Port Authority are party in that case and shouldn´t run the investigation - findings will be.
Jo
Annex14 is offline  
Old 31st May 2011, 08:47
  #392 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: CFE
Age: 65
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fender-bender for 2 Delta planes at ATL Thursday night | 11alive.com

By the way, you could park a 737 on EACH wing of the A380
valvanuz is offline  
Old 31st May 2011, 09:03
  #393 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A380 Visibility from Cockpit in Static Position

http://www.airbus.com/fileadmin/medi...0_20101101.pdf

4-4-0 page 2 FIGURE 1
glad rag is offline  
Old 31st May 2011, 17:27
  #394 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: the dark side
Posts: 1,112
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
SM
As long as NYPA allows the use of taxiways below Annex 14 standards this sort of thing will happen
Well done SM with that single line, you have managed to confirm that your knowledge of ICAO and how it works, specifically Annex14, is as woefully lacking as your knowledge in other areas of aviation.

You can of course prove to us 'doubters' of your knowledge of aviation, which taxiway fails to meet Annex 14 and specifically, why.

Over to you ...
jumpseater is offline  
Old 31st May 2011, 21:06
  #395 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: New York City
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Quote:
SM
As long as NYPA allows the use of taxiways below Annex 14 standards this sort of thing will happen
Well done SM with that single line, you have managed to confirm that your knowledge of ICAO and how it works, specifically Annex14, is as woefully lacking as your knowledge in other areas of aviation.

You can of course prove to us 'doubters' of your knowledge of aviation, which taxiway fails to meet Annex 14 and specifically, why.

Over to you ...
Additionally, I'd love to hear who NYPA is. I'm familiar with PANYNJ, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, but what's NYPA?
MikeNYC is offline  
Old 31st May 2011, 23:41
  #396 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sale, Australia
Age: 80
Posts: 3,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well done SM with that single line, you have managed to confirm that your knowledge of ICAO and how it works, specifically Annex14, is as woefully lacking as your knowledge in other areas of aviation.
SMellie sure is a slow learner.
Brian Abraham is offline  
Old 1st Jun 2011, 08:05
  #397 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East of There
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AF were just unlucky they operate the largest modern aircraft to JFK.
And what was their excuse when one of their A330s struck this very same "largest modern aircraft" in an almost identical mishap at CDG a few months earlier?
Checkerboard 13 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 03:21
  #398 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A VERY similar accident happened yesterday between a B747 and an ERJ....let's hear the passionate people from this forum share their passion for the wingtip clearance of the 747, lest the double standards be brutally exposed...

Boeing 747 clips tail of American Eagle regional jet in Chicago - USATODAY.com
Willoz269 is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 03:43
  #399 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seat 1A
Posts: 8,552
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
A picture tells a thousand words...

Capn Bloggs is offline  
Old 31st May 2012, 04:44
  #400 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The TV video shows the B744 nose wheel on the taxiway centreline as well.
BusyB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.