Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Southwest FLT 812 Decompression and diversion

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Southwest FLT 812 Decompression and diversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 01:40
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: No. Cal, USA
Age: 72
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Southwest FLT 812 Decompression and diversion

KCRA 3 Insider

YUMA, Ariz. -- A Southwest flight headed to Sacramento from Phoenix had to be diverted to Yuma, Ariz. on Friday because of rapid decompression caused by a hole in the plane. Sacramento International officials said that Flight 812, a Boeing 737, had 118 passengers aboard and landed safely at Yuma Marine Corps Air Station/International Airport at 4:07 p.m. The airport is a dual-use facility. The plane descended 16,000 feet in a minute, according to the flight-tracking website called flightaware.com.

One passenger said they heard an explosion during the flight and could see daylight coming through a hole in the plane. The KCRA viewer sent in a photo that also shows oxygen masks dropping inside the aircraft.

"The hole is about 6 feet, oxygen masks are down," passenger Brenda Reese told KCRA 3. Reese said she was asleep when the rapid descent took place but heard a jarring noise.

A separate picture sent to KCRA 3 shows the hole above a luggage compartment.

The FAA said they have not confirmed what caused the decompression.

Sacramento airline officials said they have been told that all passengers are safe, and Marine medical personnel went aboard the plane to check on the passengers once they landed in Yuma.

Flight 812 was scheduled to arrive at 5:30 p.m. in Sacramento and is now set to arrive at 8:45 p.m. An FAA inspector is headed from Phoenix to Yuma to conduct an investigation. In July 2009, a Southwest Boeing 737 going from Nashville to Baltimore was forced to make an emergency landing in West Virginia after a foot-long hole opened in the top of the plane. Federal investigators later said that metal fatigue caused the hole to rip open in the roof of the plane. Nobody was injured in that case.

Former United Airlines pilot Jerry Blalock said pilots are trained in rapid decompression cases, and that it appears the pilot of Flight 812 landed the plane in textbook fashion. Reese said passengers started clapping for the pilot when the plane landed.

###

Hope the crew is enjoying a well-deserved beer for a great effort.
The reporting wasn't all that bad either.
grumpyoldgeek is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 02:49
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,569
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I did a quick search and a pic I found showed a hole of several square ft.

If confirmed, that is a big hole and I would expect some luggage to have been ejected
lomapaseo is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 02:54
  #3 (permalink)  
VJW
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1,130
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Having flown a 737 800 for 3 years now, I'm not sure I believe it could do 16,000 feet per min in an emergency decent. Recon you'd have to drop the gear to even obtain half that!
VJW is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 02:55
  #4 (permalink)  
VFD
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: us
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"The hole is about 6 feet, oxygen masks are down," passenger Brenda Reese told KCRA 3. Reese said she was asleep when the rapid descent took place but heard a jarring noise.
I caught some pics on another site and from the inside it appears that the hole/tear is at least 4 ft long. The previous fuselage problems have been holes about 8" x 12". We will have to wait on this one to see if there was a large failure from the start or airflow over the fuselage increased the size of the hole.
VFD is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 03:15
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Registration N632SW, 737-300, 15 yrs old, probably a lot of cycles.
deSitter is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 03:16
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Nairobi
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
drop

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2011...verted.html?hp

"It dropped pretty quick" this report indicates 6 ft hole
Greytraveler is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 05:27
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PDX
Age: 49
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As reported on another forum, N632SW currently at 39,768 cycles and 48,722 hours.
blueirishPDX is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 06:15
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 49
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Three questions from a dumb guy:
1. did something like this happen outside US also in the past?
2. did something like this happen with an Airbus already?
3. if I had to pay $7.5 million two years back: wouldn't I take care of such inspections or is it like: "Uhm, it happened once and the lightning will not strike the same place again?"
sprocky_ger is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 06:41
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: US/EU
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
probably a lot of cycles
On Southwest routes, that's pretty much a certainty.
Mark in CA is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 06:42
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Brisbane
Age: 49
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
sprocky, you are not dumb.
Your questions however, are dumb.
1) Do your research.
2) Don't try starting an Airbus vs Boeing argument. Once again, do your research
3) This one is just dumb. Reasearch once again.
BrissySparkyCoit is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 07:23
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Europe
Age: 49
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BrissySparkyCoit

1. I could not find any evidence for this happening outside US. I remember the famous happening with Aloha 1988. There were several accidents following decompression but they were attributed to other causes (cargo door failures: DC-10; design failure: Comet).

2. Did not want to start a fight Airbus vs. Boeing. Just wanted to know if this has happened to an Airbus before. I could not find evidence for this. Sure, Airbus is a much younger company with less sales in total. But in about 30 years there should be some aircraft 15 years old with about the same amount of cycles. Or do airlines trash Airbus aircraft after 10 years. I doubt that.

3. Please explain your statement. If this is something serious I'd definetely have a look at this. Or is it all about saving money? Squeeze the valets of pax as much as you can but don't care about their lives?

I am no expert. I only want to understand a bit more. The only major knowledge in aviation is related to the PA200 I was working on for 3.5 years. At that time there was still something installed called the "fatique counter". If there was anything suspicious the a/c was taken out of service for further investigation. Also the a/c fuselage, wings and tailerons were inspected after a certain amount of cycles. During those inspections the a/c was almost taken apart completely. I remember having seen a show on TV that this is also done on civil aircraft.
sprocky_ger is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 07:25
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Singapore
Age: 74
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
39,768 cycles and 48,722 hours
As SLF, I find these numbers to be enlightening.

First, for a 15 year old plane, it is running 2,651 cycles per year, 7.26 cycles per day. That means this plane must have, on average, started out at 6 AM in the morning and hit the terminal at last flight at 9 or 10 PM at the earliest.

Second, the plane is building hours at 1.23 hrs per cycle. This suggests an awful lot of puddle jumps from Austin to Houston, to Dallas, and back again.

Seems like this plane has absolutely been beat to death, and makes me ask the question if there is some kind of "multiplier" to take into account cycles in gauging aging and airworthiness?
StrongEagle is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 07:36
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: uk
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The hours and landings and age are about half the life of a 737.
boxmover is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 08:00
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: London
Age: 68
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Some people shows signs of old age at 45, I guess the same applies to planes... Early retirement....
vanHorck is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 08:44
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Among camels and dunes
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow, pax must have gotten a big fright, along with the crew. Here is a picture from inside

BBC News - Holed Southwest Airlines flight makes emergency landing
Jetjock330 is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 09:48
  #16 (permalink)  
Everything is under control.
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Regarding descent rate, from the NYT article linked above:

Ian Gregor, a Federal Aviation Administration spokesman in Los Angeles, said the pilot "made a rapid, controlled descent from 36,000 feet to 11,000 feet altitude."

Don Nelson, who was seated one row from the rupture, said it took about four noisy minutes for the plane to dip to less than 10,000 feet, which made him "lightheaded."
Eboy is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 11:01
  #17 (permalink)  
VJW
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 1,130
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Eboy, that sounds much more realistic. That's about 6k feet a minute. The inital 16k in a minute sounds impossible. Don't even think you'd get that if you were shot down
VJW is online now  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 11:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The Sandpit
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another chem mill problem or something else I wonder?
mono is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 12:21
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Europe
Posts: 341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting as Southwest may be considered as the Low Cost model pioneer. The financials look great but past and recent history of maintenance compliance isn't great... Wonder if the European LoCos have taken on this part of the model...? what you pay is what you get...
320DRIVER is offline  
Old 2nd Apr 2011, 12:23
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: London, New York, Paris, Moscow.
Posts: 3,632
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Was there not a thread about a report on inspectors/subcontractors and stuff that didn't fit on &£&-* assembly a wee while back......<whistling>
glad rag is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.