Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Flight Deck Forums > Rumours & News
Reload this Page >

Unairworthy Antonov AN-12 crashes in the Republic of the Congo.

Wikiposts
Search
Rumours & News Reporting Points that may affect our jobs or lives as professional pilots. Also, items that may be of interest to professional pilots.

Unairworthy Antonov AN-12 crashes in the Republic of the Congo.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23rd Mar 2011, 23:48
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Cornwall-on-Hudson, New York
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"There is nothing inherent in a engine out scenario that causes the plane to roll on it's back."

You can't be serious. Are you a pilot?
stepwilk is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2011, 01:04
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is nothing inherent in a engine out scenario that causes the plane to roll on it's back.
Probably a pilot but not multi-engine rated.

I thank lomapaseo for his excellent screen capture work, it really makes it easy to discuss what happened.
I concur with the majority of posters on this thread. The fans on the starboard wing are not under power. Both props on the port wing are putting out a lot of power-you can tell from the exhaust trails diverging and from the rapid nose down yaw at the 90 degree roll point. There was no effort to chop power on the good side (no decrease in density of the smoke trail), so the guy flying was behind the aircraft mentally.
The proximate cause of the loss of control was a mis-handling of the loss of engine power on the starboard wing. The reasons for the dual engine loss of power on the starboard wing are unknown at present. It would be interesting to know when the engine failures occurred.
At least that is my personal opinion of the accident. Unfortunately, it is improbable that the accident will be fully investigated.
You may fire when ready Gridley.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2011, 03:10
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Brazil
Age: 50
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just wondering

At some ex-soviet era cargo planes the engines are with the FE, right?
A crew with no training, no CRM, in an unarworthy aircraft...

If I am wrong please let me know.
cavok73 is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2011, 05:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: My Stringy Brane
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An-12 has no center console/power quadrant -- instead a passageway for the navigator to reach his station.

Set of throttles and trim wheel outboard of each pilot's seat.
Machaca is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 09:00
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Europe
Age: 39
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what s the cause?

hi guys, I wanna ask your opinion about the causes of the crash..
I mean, I agree with you about the engines out, but ..why both engines on the same side??
it seems something more then a casuality, maybe also a human error in managing the emergency?
pls let me know what you think..
Matt
mATT84DC is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 17:16
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Matt, you give your location as DRC, so I assume in some proximity to the crash.

Without a full accident investigation, you are unlikely to learn the reasons for the accident.

Engine power loss could be a result of bad maintenance or fuel contamination, low fuel, or even bad switchology in the cockpit.

The initial loss of control was apparently not responded to by the PF and allowed to continue. How the aircraft arrived in its predicament is unknown, so we do not know how much time the crew had to react to their problems and prepare for an approach.

That the aircraft was not considered airworthy is still another issue, but is indicative of the willingness of the operators to bend regulations to suit themselves. This means that no manufacturers support was available, and no government oversight of operations. In essence, an accident waiting to happen.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 27th Mar 2011, 22:28
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: canada
Age: 41
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
hi guys this accident is very sad i have seen the crew many times im based in pointe noire and i had landed about two before the antonov 12 there were 4 to 5 miles final rwy 17 when they tried to make to the sea because the engines right side both flamed out and they did not make it. i think they flamed out from fuel starvation no other reason two engines flame out at the same time. minimum fuel to brazaville and back to take more payload. even there take off is scary its get airborne at the very of end of the rwy and it barely climbs. very sad rest in peace
romeo2die4 is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2011, 04:34
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
minimum fuel to brazaville and back to take more payload. even there take off is scary its get airborne at the very of end of the rwy and it barely climbs.
Brazzaville is listed as 10800 feet paved runway. Field elevation just over 1000 feet!
Machinbird is offline  
Old 28th Mar 2011, 04:47
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: btw SAMAR and TOSPA
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
two before the antonov 12t
means 6 or 7 hours before the accident, unless it happened in a microsoft fs
threemiles is offline  
Old 29th Mar 2011, 19:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Dark Africa
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe he was saying that the antanov was the second aircraft landing after they've landed. Not time related but number of aircraft related.
Yes these guys do take the minimal fuel to do a trip. They overload totally and use all of the runways to get airborne. Scary to watch these rambo's operating..........
Bleedvalve is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 01:53
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Not far from a big Lake
Age: 81
Posts: 1,454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know where the AN-12 fuel pickup point is in the tanks?
Normally, fuel pickups permit consuming the last of the fuel while flying in a nose up (ie landing) attitude but not necessarily in a nose down attitude. Dropping the flaps at the upper end of the allowed airspeed range while light on fuel could conceivably un-port the fuel pickups at a very inconvenient time.

Last edited by Machinbird; 30th Mar 2011 at 05:32.
Machinbird is offline  
Old 30th Mar 2011, 12:47
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Asia
Posts: 2,372
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
From memory, approaches are flown with the outboard engines at idle and power supplied by the inboards in order to maintain airflow over the elevators.

I can't think of any western type which needs to do this.
Metro man is offline  
Old 31st Mar 2011, 08:18
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Agde
Age: 75
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually, they don't always leave their base with minimum fuel. Have seen similair aircraft at remote Angolan airfields defueling into plastic cans and selling it to the locals to use in their Primus stoves - it's only paraffin after all! Then they call for priority on arrival back in Luanda.
lambert is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.