Pilots didn't know about evacuation
Controversial, moi?
From the AAIB report it is clear that, while CC have the authority to order an evacuation, the company policy is that they should only do so in an extreme/catastrophic situation. My airline has similar wording in the manuals.
The situation on that aircraft was clearly not extreme/catastrophic. The flight crew were concious, aware and able to communicate. The cabin crew member acted outside their remit.
In SEP refresher training it is always interesting to ask CC to describe examples of what they consider a catastrophic situation. The answers are often illuminating.
The situation on that aircraft was clearly not extreme/catastrophic. The flight crew were concious, aware and able to communicate. The cabin crew member acted outside their remit.
In SEP refresher training it is always interesting to ask CC to describe examples of what they consider a catastrophic situation. The answers are often illuminating.
How many people would have been injured or worse had she not ordered an evacuation?
The answers are often illuminating.
Oh please no! I find myself agreeing with 411a. Except of course for his last sentence starting then again...
The reason that the flight deck should be informed/responsible for the decision to evacuate is beautifully put by McBruce. The burning smell may be the passengers going through the engines!
I have worked for one airline in which the cabin crew could make an independent decision, witout informing the flight deck to initiate an evacuation. The chance of an uncoordinated accident as a result, always frightened me.
In my present company, normally the Flight deck make the decision, the Capt. initiates it but there is provision for the cabin crew to ascertain that the flight deck are capable of making the decision; i.e haven't become incapacitated. Then they would take over. Key word there is of course normal - specious really, as normal and evacuation make for strange bedfellows, to say the least. Still not perfect perhaps but better methinks.
Interesting report though, we all live and learn and hopefully make things better as a result.
BSD.
The reason that the flight deck should be informed/responsible for the decision to evacuate is beautifully put by McBruce. The burning smell may be the passengers going through the engines!
I have worked for one airline in which the cabin crew could make an independent decision, witout informing the flight deck to initiate an evacuation. The chance of an uncoordinated accident as a result, always frightened me.
In my present company, normally the Flight deck make the decision, the Capt. initiates it but there is provision for the cabin crew to ascertain that the flight deck are capable of making the decision; i.e haven't become incapacitated. Then they would take over. Key word there is of course normal - specious really, as normal and evacuation make for strange bedfellows, to say the least. Still not perfect perhaps but better methinks.
Interesting report though, we all live and learn and hopefully make things better as a result.
BSD.
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In the dark
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
10th Feb 2011 11:43 ShyTorque
But surely the flight deck crew should have been informed, to safeguard their safety too?
But surely the flight deck crew should have been informed, to safeguard their safety too?
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: LHR
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If the Senior had stuck her head through the door and just said quite simply, "Captain, I'm going to start an evacuation." That would have been enough to get the Flight Decks attention. From the AAIB report she hardly tried to tell them, it sounds like she made her own decision and that was that. Told the rest of the Cabin Crew and off they went.
A quick sentence and that would have given enough time for the flight crew to say either "NO! STOP! We have it under control!" or "Ok, if you think it's that serious, take your station and we'll commence it, under my authority."
Once again, lack of communication, from both sides of the door have led to an event which COULD have led to more serious injuries. SEP refresher training for all I think.
A quick sentence and that would have given enough time for the flight crew to say either "NO! STOP! We have it under control!" or "Ok, if you think it's that serious, take your station and we'll commence it, under my authority."
Once again, lack of communication, from both sides of the door have led to an event which COULD have led to more serious injuries. SEP refresher training for all I think.
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Herts
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMHO as humble SLF, the CC played it safe, which is the correct thing to do. I thought the whole ethos of flying was safety first, not protocol.
Talking in hindsight about any crew communication issues..... communication goes both ways... maybe the FD crew could have told the CC that the problem had been identified and was being resolved ?
Talking in hindsight about any crew communication issues..... communication goes both ways... maybe the FD crew could have told the CC that the problem had been identified and was being resolved ?
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: On cloud 9
Posts: 884
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because you can't see flames doesn't mean there aren't any.
THAT is the reason the Captain should have been informed, and passenger injuries would most likely have been non-existent.
In reality i don't think it is the CC that fails here, but the company for not training them well enough to do the job they do.
IMHO as humble SLF, the CC played it safe, which is the correct thing to do. I thought the whole ethos of flying was safety first, not protocol.
Talking in hindsight about any crew communication issues..... communication goes both ways... maybe the FD crew could have told the CC that the problem had been identified and was being resolved ?
Talking in hindsight about any crew communication issues..... communication goes both ways... maybe the FD crew could have told the CC that the problem had been identified and was being resolved ?
How could the FD communicate that the problem was under control when they were never involved in the process from the CC? we don't tell them about every little technical fault for a various of reasons, but they probably would have been told if they took the interphone and informed that "we have some smoke development in the rear", what do you want us to do? - and take it from there.
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Wor Yerm
Age: 68
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
...having received an unsatisfactory response
To me, it appears that even with the flight deck door open and being fully aware that the crew were working on the problem, the SCCM still decided to order an evacuation. At that point, she was then NOT part of the crew and effectively a loose cannon and certainly not working under the Captain's authority. Her actions actually undermined it. Maybe it was panic or even poor training. The AAIB report states "However, the flight crew were not incapacitated and it is evident that verbal communication with them would have been possible had the member of cabin crew persisted." No medals should be awarded for unnecessary and dangerous decisions taken in isolation. But it was the SCCM's statement after the event saying she'd do the same again that suggests she is doing the wrong job. So I'll stick with my "churlish" remarks.
And I'll pose another question to those who think the SCCM did the right thing. Would it have been acceptable for any of the other cabin crew or even a passenger to have initiated the evacuation? If not, why not? So why didn't they?
For what it is worth, recycling fans small horrible when they fail. I have had several fail in flight and the acrid, pungent, electrical burning smell takes ages to dissipate. Similar to smoke, the odour appears to get into fabric and soft furnishings and stay for ages. The smell lingers long after the source expires. Returning to this incident, I can understand the cabin crews' distress because to them it would appear that either no action has been taken or what has been done was ineffective. Unfortunately, this is one of those occasions where over-reaction has caused unnecessary injuries.
From the report: Air Accidents Investigation: Boeing 757-204, G-BYAT
(Emphasis mine.)
Not a very clear command - perhaps she intended the passengers to simply hasten disembarking via the (already open and in use) forward door and aerobridge?
The SCCM then returned to the forward cabin and contacted all the crew using the Alert Call on the cabin interphone. They confirmed that there was a pungent burning smell throughout the cabin; there was no smoke, but the smell was strongest in the rear of the aircraft. However, the flight crew did not respond to this call.
The SCCM returned to the flight deck to update the commander, and while the flight crew acknowledged her presence, she did not convey her concerns on the need to evacuate the passengers as the flight crew were busy dealing with the incident. She considered that she needed to disembark the passengers as quickly as possible and so, as there were no steps at the rear of the aircraft, when she returned to the cabin she announced, in a calm manner, over the passenger address system: “Please evacuate the aircraft as quickly as possible. Leave all hand baggage behind.” The cabin crew at the rear doors re-armed their doors and deployed the slides. A total of 43 passengers used the slides, with four of them receiving minor injuries.
The SCCM returned to the flight deck to update the commander, and while the flight crew acknowledged her presence, she did not convey her concerns on the need to evacuate the passengers as the flight crew were busy dealing with the incident. She considered that she needed to disembark the passengers as quickly as possible and so, as there were no steps at the rear of the aircraft, when she returned to the cabin she announced, in a calm manner, over the passenger address system: “Please evacuate the aircraft as quickly as possible. Leave all hand baggage behind.” The cabin crew at the rear doors re-armed their doors and deployed the slides. A total of 43 passengers used the slides, with four of them receiving minor injuries.
Not a very clear command - perhaps she intended the passengers to simply hasten disembarking via the (already open and in use) forward door and aerobridge?
Always understood the authority for cabin crew to commence an evacuation on their own initiative was envisaged for a situation where urgent action was clearly necessary - e.g crash landing. This does not appear to have been the case in these circumstances.
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: England
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In whose opinion?
Unfortunately, this is one of those occasions where over-reaction has caused unnecessary injuries.
we are not talking about a Flight 163 scenario
You don't come across as a pilot
If you can't see flames but only limited amount of smoke (hence not so dense you can't see through it), then it's hardly clearly catastrophic and there is time to think
What materials burn without smoke? Have you heard of flashover?
It's easy to sit in the comfort of your armchair with full knowledge of what has happened. But try and put yourself in that situation, honestly, and tell me how you would react.
How quickly could it have gone out of control?
MM,
Many years ago my *airline changed from separate FC & CC SEP training to combined exercises.
Great idea! We both discovered that we held some misconceptions of each other's thought processes and both benefited from the combo - as, of course, did flight safety.
* Can't remember if same one as yours.
Many years ago my *airline changed from separate FC & CC SEP training to combined exercises.
Great idea! We both discovered that we held some misconceptions of each other's thought processes and both benefited from the combo - as, of course, did flight safety.
* Can't remember if same one as yours.
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: here and there
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its easy to speak (post) after you read the article. But if you are at the back of the plane with that strong burning smell, hving no info/PA from the FD I bet many of you would have a different opinion.
IMO CC did the right thing. They had no ideea whats going on, they played it safe. Purser tried to get more info, couldnt, so she got everyone out. Better be safe than sorry.
situation wasnt catastrophic? well, there's a fine line here. what should they hv done? wait for the flames? many of you say now that it wasnt catastrophic but you werent there at that time to make the judgment without knowing whats wrong.
same old story. we are all brave and bright in front of the computer.
IMO CC did the right thing. They had no ideea whats going on, they played it safe. Purser tried to get more info, couldnt, so she got everyone out. Better be safe than sorry.
situation wasnt catastrophic? well, there's a fine line here. what should they hv done? wait for the flames? many of you say now that it wasnt catastrophic but you werent there at that time to make the judgment without knowing whats wrong.
same old story. we are all brave and bright in front of the computer.
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Middle England
Posts: 611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I had exactly the same failure on a B757 at MAN about 10 years ago. We were boarding at the time, strong electrical burning smell in the flight deck and cabin. We stopped the boarding and disembarked those already on board. No fuss, no drama. Certainly no need for slides.
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 7,072
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"If you can't see flames but only limited amount of smoke (hence not so dense you can't see through it), then it's hardly clearly catastrophic and there is time to think"
Ever been in a fire?
I was in an office (in London) once and a few whisps of smoke came through the floor - within 10 seconds the place was so full of smoke you couldn't see your hand in front of your face
if you see smoke GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE
I suspect in this case the pilots where wrapped up trying to figure out what might be wrong and just didn't pay the CC any attention when she poked her head around the door
Sure, she should have said something to get their attention but she was down back and they were up front - better to have 4 minor injuries than a blazing plane full of people
Ever been in a fire?
I was in an office (in London) once and a few whisps of smoke came through the floor - within 10 seconds the place was so full of smoke you couldn't see your hand in front of your face
if you see smoke GET THE HELL OUT OF THERE
I suspect in this case the pilots where wrapped up trying to figure out what might be wrong and just didn't pay the CC any attention when she poked her head around the door
Sure, she should have said something to get their attention but she was down back and they were up front - better to have 4 minor injuries than a blazing plane full of people
The fumes from this non-catastrophic failure are like all combustion byproducts -- toxic. Keeping people in a confined space with toxic fumes is not conducive to their health. People with asthma, allergies and other respiratory pathologies are at particular risk.
Many fires do self-extinguish, but without clairvoyance there is nothing to distinguish the first waft of smoke/fumes between a small release of toxic fumes or the beginnings of a conflagration that will in the next several seconds consume the entire aircraft.
If the CC waits for visible flames or heavy smoke, lives will be lost.
Many fires do self-extinguish, but without clairvoyance there is nothing to distinguish the first waft of smoke/fumes between a small release of toxic fumes or the beginnings of a conflagration that will in the next several seconds consume the entire aircraft.
If the CC waits for visible flames or heavy smoke, lives will be lost.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have never worked at a company that has required the cabin crew to seek my permission to evacuate
that will in the next several seconds consume the entire aircraft.